agentleFS
darkweb19darkweb19/skills/skill-tester/SKILL.md

skill-tester

Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Validate, test, and score the quality of skills within the claude-skills ecosystem. Comprehensive meta-skill: structure validation, Python script testing (syntax + imports + runtime + output format), multi-dimensional quality scoring with letter grades and tier classification (BASIC/STANDARD/POWERFUL). Use when authoring a new skill, auditing existing skills for tier promotion, setting up pre-commit hooks for skill quality, or integrating skill QA into CI.

11 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use skill-creator.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SentrySkill

    skill-creator

    Create new agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "add a new skill", "write a skill", "make a skill", "build a skill", or scaffold a new skill with SKILL.md. Guides through requirements, writing, registration, and verification.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If any step fails, apply the top improvement_roadmap item and re-run all three — never report a partial pass.

    line 84

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill Tester

Tier: POWERFUL · Category: Engineering Quality Assurance · Dependencies: None (Python stdlib only)

Meta-skill that validates, tests, and scores skills in this repository. Four tools, run from the repo root with full paths:

  1. scripts/skill_validator.py — structure + documentation compliance
  2. scripts/script_tester.py — Python script syntax/imports/runtime/output testing
  3. scripts/quality_scorer.py — multi-dimensional scoring with letter grade
  4. scripts/security_scorer.py — security posture scoring (also available via quality_scorer.py --include-security)

Scope note: this skill's tier line-count minimums measure legacy skills. For authoring new skills, engineering/write-a-skill (SKILL.md under ~100 lines, Matt Pocock doctrine) is the binding standard — do not pad a new skill to satisfy a tier minimum here.

Quick Start (exact, runnable from repo root)

# 1. Validate structure (exit non-zero on failure — usable as a gate)
python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/skill_validator.py engineering/skills/self-eval --json

# 2. Test the skill's Python scripts (30s default timeout per script)
python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/script_tester.py engineering/skills/self-eval --json

# 3. Score quality (fail CI below threshold with --minimum-score)
python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/quality_scorer.py engineering/skills/self-eval --json --detailed --minimum-score 75

Consume the JSON: validator emits overall_score, compliance_level, per-check checks{}; scorer emits overall_score, letter_grade, tier_recommendation, dimensions, and an improvement_roadmap — work the roadmap top-down, then re-run until the target score is met.

For repo-wide auditing prefer scripts/audit_skills.py at the repo root (wraps the write-a-skill checklist runner across all skills).

What Each Tool Checks

skill_validator.py

  • SKILL.md frontmatter parsing, required sections, minimum line counts per tier (--tier BASIC|STANDARD|POWERFUL)
  • Required structure: SKILL.md, README.md, scripts/, references/, assets/, expected_outputs/
  • Python scripts: argparse present, stdlib-only imports

script_tester.py

  • AST-based syntax validation; import analysis (flags external dependencies)
  • Controlled execution with timeout protection (--timeout, default 30s)
  • --help functionality verification; sample-data runs compared against expected_outputs/

quality_scorer.py

Four dimensions, 25% each: Documentation (depth, examples, references), Code Quality (complexity, error handling, output consistency), Completeness (required dirs, sample data, expected outputs), Usability (help text, example clarity). Outputs 0-100 + A-F grade + tier recommendation.

Tier Classification

TierSKILL.mdScriptsCLI surface
BASIC≥ 100 lines1 (100-300 LOC)basic argparse
STANDARD≥ 200 lines1-2 (300-500 LOC)subcommands, JSON + text output
POWERFUL≥ 300 lines2-3 (500-800 LOC)multiple modes, CI integration

(Advisory for legacy skills; new skills follow write-a-skill — see scope note above.)

CI Integration

# GitHub Actions: gate changed skills
- name: "validate-changed-skills"
  run: |
    for skill in $changed_skills; do
      python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/skill_validator.py "$skill" --json
      python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/script_tester.py "$skill"
      python3 engineering/skills/skill-tester/scripts/quality_scorer.py "$skill" --minimum-score 75
    done

Pre-commit hook: run the validator on the staged skill directory and block the commit on non-zero exit.

Verification Loop

A skill "passes" when, in one run from repo root:

  1. skill_validator.py <skill> --json exits 0,
  2. script_tester.py <skill> reports all scripts passing, and
  3. quality_scorer.py <skill> --minimum-score <target> exits 0.

If any step fails, apply the top improvement_roadmap item and re-run all three — never report a partial pass.

Troubleshooting

  • Timeout errors → raise --timeout or optimize the script under test
  • Import failures → external deps detected; stdlib-only is the repo policy
  • Tier misclassification → check line counts/LOC against the tier table; remember the write-a-skill exception for new skills

References: references/ holds the structure specification, tier requirements matrix, and scoring rubric the tools implement.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.