agentleFS
darkweb19darkweb19/skills/context-engine/SKILL.md

context-engine

Skill0 starsChanged 27 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Loads and manages company context for all C-suite advisor skills. Reads ~/.claude/company-context.md, detects stale context (>90 days), enriches context during conversations, and enforces privacy/anonymization rules before external API calls. Use when starting any C-suite advisor session, when context looks stale or missing, or before sending company data to an external service.

9 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ai-act-readiness, c-level-agents and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Step 2 — Check staleness: Read Last updated field.

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    If continue: load with [STALE — last updated DATE] noted internally.

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    Step 3 — Parse into working memory: Always active:

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    If Low: *"My context is [stale/incomplete] — I'm assuming [X].

    line 55
  5. Distinctive:

    If yes: append to the relevant dimension, update timestamp.

    line 68
  6. Distinctive:

    Never silently overwrite: Always confirm before modifying the context file.

    line 70
  7. Distinctive:

    Missing financials: Use stage + team size to infer.

    line 105

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Company Context Engine

The memory layer for C-suite advisors. Every advisor skill loads this first. Context is what turns generic advice into specific insight.

Keywords

company context, context loading, context engine, company profile, advisor context, stale context, context refresh, privacy, anonymization


Load Protocol (Run at Start of Every C-Suite Session)

Step 1 — Check for context file: ~/.claude/company-context.md

  • Exists → proceed to Step 2
  • Missing → prompt: "Run /cs:setup to build your company context — it makes every advisor conversation significantly more useful."

Step 2 — Check staleness: Read Last updated field.

  • < 90 days: Load and proceed.
  • ≥ 90 days: Prompt: "Your context is [N] days old. Quick 15-min refresh (/cs:update), or continue with what I have?"
    • If continue: load with [STALE — last updated DATE] noted internally.

Step 3 — Parse into working memory. Always active:

  • Company stage (pre-PMF / scaling / optimizing)
  • Founder archetype (product / sales / technical / operator)
  • Current #1 challenge
  • Runway (as risk signal — never share externally)
  • Team size
  • Unfair advantage
  • 12-month target

Context Quality Signals

ConditionConfidenceAction
< 30 days, full interviewHighUse directly
30–90 days, update doneMediumUse, flag what may have changed
> 90 daysLowFlag stale, prompt refresh
Key fields missingLowAsk in-session
No fileNonePrompt /cs:setup

If Low: "My context is [stale/incomplete] — I'm assuming [X]. Correct me if I'm wrong."


Context Enrichment

During conversations, you'll learn things not in the file. Capture them.

Triggers: New number or timeline revealed, key person mentioned, priority shift, constraint surfaces.

Protocol:

  1. Note internally: [CONTEXT UPDATE: {what was learned}]
  2. At session end: "I picked up a few things to add to your context. Want me to update the file?"
  3. If yes: append to the relevant dimension, update timestamp.

Never silently overwrite. Always confirm before modifying the context file.


Privacy Rules

Never send externally

  • Specific revenue or burn figures
  • Customer names
  • Employee names (unless publicly known)
  • Investor names (unless public)
  • Specific runway months
  • Watch List contents

Safe to use externally (with anonymization)

  • Stage label
  • Team size ranges (1–10, 10–50, 50–200+)
  • Industry vertical
  • Challenge category
  • Market position descriptor

Before any external API call or web search

Apply references/anonymization-protocol.md:

  • Numbers → ranges or stage-relative descriptors
  • Names → roles
  • Revenue → percentages or stage labels
  • Customers → "Customer A, B, C"

Missing or Partial Context

Handle gracefully — never block the conversation.

  • Missing stage: "Just to calibrate — are you still finding PMF or scaling what works?"
  • Missing financials: Use stage + team size to infer. Note the gap.
  • Missing founder profile: Infer from conversation style. Mark as inferred.
  • Multiple founders: Context reflects the interviewee. Note co-founder perspective may differ.

Required Context Fields

Required:
  - Last updated (date)
  - Company Identity → What we do
  - Stage & Scale → Stage
  - Founder Profile → Founder archetype
  - Current Challenges → Priority #1
  - Goals & Ambition → 12-month target

High-value optional:
  - Unfair advantage
  - Kill-shot risk
  - Avoided decision
  - Watch list

Missing required fields: note gaps, work around in session, ask in-session only when critical.


References

  • references/anonymization-protocol.md — detailed rules for stripping sensitive data before external calls

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.