company-os
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning.
4 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gquthier/company-ostheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 8, 2026
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skillsedited, first seen Jun 4, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18100% same
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 1
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 283% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- gquthier/company-os★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository198 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-auditSkill
- ab-test-setupSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- adversarial-reviewerSkill
- aeoSkill
- agent-designerSkill
- agent-protocolSkill
- agent-workflow-designerSkill
- ai-securitySkill
- analytics-trackingSkill
- andreessenSkill
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- apple-hig-expertSkill
- app-store-optimizationSkill
- autoresearch-agentSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- azure-cloud-architectSkill
- board-deck-builderSkill
- board-meetingSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-growth-skillsSkill
- business-investment-advisorSkill
- campaign-analyticsSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- cfo-advisorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- change-managementSkill
- chaos-engineeringSkill
- chief-ai-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-customer-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-data-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- chro-advisorSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- ciso-advisorSkill
- claude-coachSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- cmo-advisorSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- competitive-intelSkill
- competitive-teardownSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-humanizerSkill
- content-productionSkill
- content-strategySkill
- context-engineSkill
- contract-and-proposal-writerSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- cpo-advisorSkill
- cro-advisorSkill
- cs-onboardSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of which framework you choose:
- Distinctive: line 37
Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"
- Distinctive: line 59
No shared ownership. "Alice and Bob both own it" means nobody owns it.
- Distinctive: line 163
Default rule: If you're deciding whether to share something internally, share it.
- Very specific: line 183
Don't implement everything at once.
- Distinctive: line 188
Start the weekly L10 meeting (no prep — just start)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Company Operating System
The operating system is the collection of tools, rhythms, and agreements that determine how the company functions. Every company has one — most just don't know what it is. Making it explicit makes it improvable.
Keywords
operating system, EOS, Entrepreneurial Operating System, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, Holacracy, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting pulse, quarterly planning, weekly scorecard, management framework, company rhythm, traction, Gino Wickman, Verne Harnish
Why This Matters
Most operational dysfunction isn't a people problem — it's a system problem. When:
- The same issues recur every week: no issue resolution system
- Meetings feel pointless: no structured meeting pulse
- Nobody knows who owns what: no accountability chart
- Quarterly goals slip: rocks aren't real commitments
Fix the system. The people will operate better inside it.
The Six Core Components
Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of which framework you choose:
1. Accountability Chart
Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"
Key distinction: One person owns each function. Multiple people may work in it. Ownership means the buck stops with one person.
Structure:
CEO
├── Sales (CRO/VP Sales)
│ ├── Inbound pipeline
│ └── Outbound pipeline
├── Product & Engineering (CTO/CPO)
│ ├── Product roadmap
│ └── Engineering delivery
├── Operations (COO)
│ ├── Customer success
│ └── Finance & Legal
└── People (CHRO/VP People)
├── Recruiting
└── People operationsRules:
- No shared ownership. "Alice and Bob both own it" means nobody owns it.
- One person can own multiple seats at early stages. That's fine. Just be explicit.
- Revisit quarterly as you scale. Ownership shifts as the company grows.
Build it in a workshop:
- List all functions the company performs
- Assign one owner per function — no exceptions
- Identify gaps (functions nobody owns) and overlaps (functions two people think they own)
- Publish it. Update it when something changes.
2. Scorecard
Weekly metrics that tell you if the company is on track. Not monthly. Not quarterly. Weekly.
Rules:
- 5–15 metrics maximum. More than 15 and nothing gets attention.
- Each metric has an owner and a weekly target (not a range — a number).
- Red/yellow/green status. Not paragraphs.
- The scorecard is discussed at the leadership team weekly meeting. Only red metrics get discussion time.
Example scorecard structure:
| Metric | Owner | Target | This Week | Status |
| New MRR | CRO | €50K | €43K | 🔴 |
| Churn | CS Lead | < 1% | 0.8% | 🟢 |
| Active users | CPO | 2,000 | 2,150 | 🟢 |
| Deployments | CTO | 3/week | 3 | 🟢 |
| Open critical bugs | CTO | 0 | 2 | 🔴 |
| Runway | CFO | > 18mo | 16mo | 🟡 |
Anti-pattern: Measuring everything. If you track 40 KPIs, you're watching, not managing.
3. Meeting Pulse
The meeting rhythm that drives the company. Not optional — the pulse is what keeps the company alive.
The full rhythm:
| Meeting | Frequency | Duration | Who | Purpose |
| Daily standup | Daily | 15 min | Each team | Blockers only |
| L10 / Leadership sync | Weekly | 90 min | Leadership team | Scorecard + issues |
| Department review | Monthly | 60 min | Dept + leadership | OKR progress |
| Quarterly planning | Quarterly | 1–2 days | Leadership | Set rocks, review strategy |
| Annual planning | Annual | 2–3 days | Leadership | 1-year + 3-year vision |
The L10 meeting (Weekly Leadership Sync): Named for the goal of each meeting being a 10/10. Fixed agenda:
- Good news (5 min) — personal + business
- Scorecard review (5 min) — flag red items only
- Rock review (5 min) — on/off track for each rock
- Customer/employee headlines (5 min)
- Issues list (60 min) — IDS (see below)
- To-dos review (5 min) — last week's commitments
- Conclude (5 min) — rate the meeting 1–10, what would make it a 10 next time
4. Issue Resolution (IDS)
The core problem-solving loop. Maximum 15 minutes per issue.
IDS: Identify, Discuss, Solve
- Identify: What is the actual issue? (Not the symptom — the root cause) State it in one sentence.
- Discuss: Relevant facts + perspectives. Time-boxed. When discussion starts repeating, stop.
- Solve: One owner. One action. One due date. Written on the to-do list.
Anti-patterns:
- "Let's take this offline" — most things taken offline never get resolved
- Discussing without deciding — a great discussion with no action item is wasted time
- Revisiting decided issues — once solved, it leaves the list. Reopen only with new information.
The Issues List: A running, prioritized list of all unresolved issues. Owned by the leadership team. Reviewed and pruned weekly. If an issue has been on the list for 3+ meetings and hasn't been discussed, it's either not a real issue or it's too scary to address — both deserve attention.
5. Rocks (90-Day Priorities)
Rocks are the 3–7 most important things each person must accomplish in the next 90 days. They're not the job description — they're the things that move the company forward.
Why 90 days? Long enough for meaningful progress. Short enough to stay real.
Rock rules:
- Each person: 3–7 rocks maximum. More than 7 and none get done.
- Company-level rocks (shared priorities): 3–7 for the leadership team
- Each rock is binary: done or not done. No "60% complete."
- Set at the quarterly planning session. Reviewed weekly (on/off track).
Bad rock: "Improve our sales process" Good rock: "Implement Salesforce CRM with full pipeline stages and weekly reporting by March 31"
Rock vs. to-do: A to-do takes one action. A rock takes 90 days of consistent work.
6. Communication Cadence
Who gets what information, when, and how.
| Audience | What | When | Format |
| All employees | Company update | Monthly | Written + Q&A |
| All employees | Quarterly results + next priorities | Quarterly | All-hands |
| Leadership team | Scorecard | Weekly | Dashboard |
| Board | Company performance | Monthly | Board memo |
| Investors | Key metrics + narrative | Monthly or quarterly | Investor update |
| Customers | Product updates | Per release | Release notes |
Default rule: If you're deciding whether to share something internally, share it. The cost of under-communication always exceeds the cost of over-communication inside a company.
Operating System Selection
See references/os-comparison.md for full comparison. Quick guide:
| If you are... | Consider... |
| 10–250 person company, founder-led, operational chaos | EOS / Traction |
| Ambitious growth company, need rigorous strategy cascade | Scaling Up |
| Tech company, engineering culture, hypothesis-driven | OKR-native |
| Decentralized, flat, high autonomy | Holacracy (only if you're patient) |
| None of the above quite fit | Custom hybrid |
Implementation Roadmap
Don't implement everything at once. See references/implementation-guide.md for the full 90-day plan.
Quick start (first 30 days):
- Build the accountability chart (1 workshop, 2 hours)
- Define 5–10 weekly scorecard metrics (leadership team alignment, 1 hour)
- Start the weekly L10 meeting (no prep — just start)
These three alone will improve coordination more than most companies achieve in a year.
Common Failure Modes
Partial implementation: "We do OKRs but skip the weekly check-in." Half an operating system is worse than none — it creates theater without accountability.
Meeting fatigue: Adding the full rhythm on top of existing meetings. Start by replacing meetings, not adding them.
Metric overload: Starting with 30 KPIs because "they all matter." Start with 5. Add when the cadence is established.
Rock inflation: Setting 12 rocks per person because "everything is a priority." When everything is a priority, nothing is. Hard limit: 7.
Leader non-compliance: Leadership team skips the L10 or doesn't follow IDS. The operating system mirrors the respect leadership gives it. If leaders don't take it seriously, nobody will.
Annual planning without quarterly review: Setting annual goals and checking in at year-end. Quarterly is the minimum review cycle for any meaningful goal.
Integration with C-Suite
The company OS is the connective tissue. Every other role depends on it:
| C-Suite Role | OS Dependency |
| CEO | Sets vision that feeds into 1-year plan and rocks |
| COO | Owns the meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence |
| CFO | Owns the financial metrics in the scorecard |
| CTO | Owns engineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics |
| CHRO | Owns people metrics (attrition, hiring velocity) in scorecard |
| Culture Architect | Culture rituals plug into the meeting pulse |
| Strategic Alignment Engine | Validates that team rocks cascade from company rocks |
Key Questions for the Operating System
- "If I asked five different team leads what the company's top 3 priorities are this quarter, would they give the same answers?"
- "What was the most important issue raised in last week's leadership meeting? Was it resolved or is it still open?"
- "Name a metric that would tell us by Friday whether this week was a good week. Do we track it?"
- "Who owns customer churn? Can you name that person without hesitation?"
- "When was the last time we updated the accountability chart?"
Detailed References
references/os-comparison.md— EOS vs Scaling Up vs OKRs vs Holacracy vs hybridreferences/implementation-guide.md— 90-day implementation plan
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

