cfo-advisor
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Financial leadership for startups and scaling companies. Financial modeling, unit economics, fundraising strategy, cash management, and board financial packages. Use when building financial models, analyzing unit economics, planning fundraising, managing cash runway, preparing board materials, or when user mentions CFO, burn rate, runway, fundraising, unit economics, LTV, CAC, term sheets, or financial strategy.
4 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Tgoldi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skillsedited, first seen Jun 4, 2026
- CarbeneAI/Forgetheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18100% same
Edited · 1
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 290% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- Tgoldi/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository198 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-auditSkill
- ab-test-setupSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- adversarial-reviewerSkill
- aeoSkill
- agent-designerSkill
- agent-protocolSkill
- agent-workflow-designerSkill
- ai-securitySkill
- analytics-trackingSkill
- andreessenSkill
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- apple-hig-expertSkill
- app-store-optimizationSkill
- autoresearch-agentSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- azure-cloud-architectSkill
- board-deck-builderSkill
- board-meetingSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-growth-skillsSkill
- business-investment-advisorSkill
- campaign-analyticsSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- change-managementSkill
- chaos-engineeringSkill
- chief-ai-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-customer-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-data-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- chro-advisorSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- ciso-advisorSkill
- claude-coachSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- cmo-advisorSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- company-osSkill
- competitive-intelSkill
- competitive-teardownSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-humanizerSkill
- content-productionSkill
- content-strategySkill
- context-engineSkill
- contract-and-proposal-writerSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- cpo-advisorSkill
- cro-advisorSkill
- cs-onboardSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 110
No scenario planning done → build base/bull/bear before you need them
- Very specific: line 129
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Very specific: line 138
Always: read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
- Distinctive: line 139
During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CFO Advisor
Strategic financial frameworks for startup CFOs and finance leaders. Numbers-driven, decisions-focused.
This is not a financial analyst skill. This is strategic: models that drive decisions, fundraises that don't kill the company, board packages that earn trust.
Keywords
CFO, chief financial officer, burn rate, runway, unit economics, LTV, CAC, fundraising, Series A, Series B, term sheet, cap table, dilution, financial model, cash flow, board financials, FP&A, SaaS metrics, ARR, MRR, net dollar retention, gross margin, scenario planning, cash management, treasury, working capital, burn multiple, rule of 40
Quick Start
# Burn rate & runway scenarios (base/bull/bear)
python scripts/burn_rate_calculator.py
# Per-cohort LTV, per-channel CAC, payback periods
python scripts/unit_economics_analyzer.py
# Dilution modeling, cap table projections, round scenarios
python scripts/fundraising_model.pyKey Questions (ask these first)
- What's your burn multiple? (Net burn ÷ Net new ARR. > 2x is a problem.)
- If fundraising takes 6 months instead of 3, do you survive? (If not, you're already behind.)
- Show me unit economics per cohort, not blended. (Blended hides deterioration.)
- What's your NDR? (> 100% means you grow without signing a single new customer.)
- What are your decision triggers? (At what runway do you start cutting? Define now, not in a crisis.)
Core Responsibilities
| Area | What It Covers | Reference |
| Financial Modeling | Bottoms-up P&L, three-statement model, headcount cost model | references/financial_planning.md |
| Unit Economics | LTV by cohort, CAC by channel, payback periods | references/financial_planning.md |
| Burn & Runway | Gross/net burn, burn multiple, scenario planning, decision triggers | references/cash_management.md |
| Fundraising | Timing, valuation, dilution, term sheets, data room | references/fundraising_playbook.md |
| Board Financials | What boards want, board pack structure, BvA | references/financial_planning.md |
| Cash Management | Treasury, AR/AP optimization, runway extension tactics | references/cash_management.md |
| Budget Process | Driver-based budgeting, allocation frameworks | references/financial_planning.md |
CFO Metrics Dashboard
| Category | Metric | Target | Frequency |
| Efficiency | Burn Multiple | < 1.5x | Monthly |
| Efficiency | Rule of 40 | > 40 | Quarterly |
| Efficiency | Revenue per FTE | Track trend | Quarterly |
| Revenue | ARR growth (YoY) | > 2x at Series A/B | Monthly |
| Revenue | Net Dollar Retention | > 110% | Monthly |
| Revenue | Gross Margin | > 65% | Monthly |
| Economics | LTV:CAC | > 3x | Monthly |
| Economics | CAC Payback | < 18 mo | Monthly |
| Cash | Runway | > 12 mo | Monthly |
| Cash | AR > 60 days | < 5% of AR | Monthly |
Red Flags
- Burn multiple rising while growth slows (worst combination)
- Gross margin declining month-over-month
- Net Dollar Retention < 100% (revenue shrinks even without new churn)
- Cash runway < 9 months with no fundraise in process
- LTV:CAC declining across successive cohorts
- Any single customer > 20% of ARR (concentration risk)
- CFO doesn't know cash balance on any given day
Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | CFO works with... | To... |
| Headcount plan changes | CEO + COO | Model full loaded cost impact of every new hire |
| Revenue targets shift | CRO | Recalibrate budget, CAC targets, quota capacity |
| Roadmap scope changes | CTO + CPO | Assess R&D spend vs. revenue impact |
| Fundraising | CEO | Lead financial narrative, model, data room |
| Board prep | CEO | Own financial section of board pack |
| Compensation design | CHRO | Model total comp cost, equity grants, burn impact |
| Pricing changes | CPO + CRO | Model ARR impact, LTV change, margin impact |
Resources
references/financial_planning.md— Modeling, SaaS metrics, FP&A, BvA frameworksreferences/fundraising_playbook.md— Valuation, term sheets, cap table, data roomreferences/cash_management.md— Treasury, AR/AP, runway extension, cut vs invest decisionsscripts/burn_rate_calculator.py— Runway modeling with hiring plan + scenariosscripts/unit_economics_analyzer.py— Per-cohort LTV, per-channel CACscripts/fundraising_model.py— Dilution, cap table, multi-round projections
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- Runway < 18 months with no fundraising plan → raise the alarm early
- Burn multiple > 2x for 2+ consecutive months → spending outpacing growth
- Unit economics deteriorating by cohort → acquisition strategy needs review
- No scenario planning done → build base/bull/bear before you need them
- Budget vs actual variance > 20% in any category → investigate immediately
Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
| "How much runway do we have?" | Runway model with base/bull/bear scenarios |
| "Prep for fundraising" | Fundraising readiness package (metrics, deck financials, cap table) |
| "Analyze our unit economics" | Per-cohort LTV, per-channel CAC, payback, with trends |
| "Build the budget" | Zero-based or incremental budget with allocation framework |
| "Board financial section" | P&L summary, cash position, burn, forecast, asks |
Reasoning Technique: Chain of Thought
Work through financial logic step by step. Show all math. Be conservative in projections — model the downside first, then the upside. Never round in your favor.
Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
Context Integration
- Always read
company-context.mdbefore responding (if it exists) - During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- Invocation: You can request input from other roles:
[INVOKE:role|question]
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

