cmo-advisor
Skill0 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Marketing leadership for scaling companies. Brand positioning, growth model design, marketing budget allocation, and marketing org design. Use when designing brand strategy, selecting growth models (PLG vs sales-led vs community-led), allocating marketing budgets, building marketing teams, or when user mentions CMO, brand strategy, growth model, CAC, LTV, channel mix, or marketing ROI.
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Hassaan146/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 25, 2026
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skillsedited, first seen Jun 4, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18100% same
Edited · 1
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 282% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository198 other files it gives its agents.
- a11y-auditSkill
- ab-test-setupSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- adversarial-reviewerSkill
- aeoSkill
- agent-designerSkill
- agent-protocolSkill
- agent-workflow-designerSkill
- ai-securitySkill
- analytics-trackingSkill
- andreessenSkill
- api-design-reviewerSkill
- api-test-suite-builderSkill
- apple-hig-expertSkill
- app-store-optimizationSkill
- autoresearch-agentSkill
- aws-solution-architectSkill
- azure-cloud-architectSkill
- board-deck-builderSkill
- board-meetingSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- business-growth-skillsSkill
- business-investment-advisorSkill
- campaign-analyticsSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- cfo-advisorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- change-managementSkill
- chaos-engineeringSkill
- chief-ai-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-customer-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-data-officer-advisorSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- chro-advisorSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- ci-cd-pipeline-builderSkill
- ciso-advisorSkill
- claude-coachSkill
- cloud-securitySkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- company-osSkill
- competitive-intelSkill
- competitive-teardownSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-humanizerSkill
- content-productionSkill
- content-strategySkill
- context-engineSkill
- contract-and-proposal-writerSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- cpo-advisorSkill
- cro-advisorSkill
- cs-onboardSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
Every CMO must own answers to these — no one else in the C-suite can:
- Distinctive: line 68
Ask these before making any strategic recommendation:
- Distinctive: line 78
If a prospect doesn't buy, why not?
- Distinctive: line 100
No defined ICP — "companies with 50-1000 employees" is not an ICP
- Distinctive: line 137
No brand positioning documented → messaging inconsistent across channels
- Very specific: line 158
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Very specific: line 167
Always: read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
- Distinctive: line 168
During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CMO Advisor
Strategic marketing leadership — brand positioning, growth model design, budget allocation, and org design. Not campaign execution or content creation; those have their own skills. This is the engine.
Keywords
CMO, chief marketing officer, brand strategy, brand positioning, growth model, product-led growth, PLG, sales-led growth, community-led growth, marketing budget, CAC, customer acquisition cost, LTV, lifetime value, channel mix, marketing ROI, pipeline contribution, marketing org, category design, competitive positioning, growth loops, payback period, MQL, pipeline coverage
Quick Start
# Model budget allocation across channels, project MQL output by scenario
python scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py
# Project MRR growth by model, show impact of channel mix shifts
python scripts/growth_model_simulator.pyReference docs (load when needed):
references/brand_positioning.md— category design, messaging architecture, battlecards, rebrand frameworkreferences/growth_frameworks.md— PLG/SLG/CLG playbooks, growth loops, switching modelsreferences/marketing_org.md— team structure by stage, hiring sequence, agency vs. in-house
The Four CMO Questions
Every CMO must own answers to these — no one else in the C-suite can:
- Who are we for? — ICP, positioning, category
- Why do they choose us? — Differentiation, messaging, brand
- How do they find us? — Growth model, channel mix, demand gen
- Is it working? — CAC, LTV:CAC, pipeline contribution, payback period
Core Responsibilities (Brief)
Brand & Positioning — Define category, build messaging architecture, maintain competitive differentiation. Details → references/brand_positioning.md
Growth Model — Choose and operate the right acquisition engine: PLG, sales-led, community-led, or hybrid. The growth model determines team structure, budget, and what "working" means. Details → references/growth_frameworks.md
Marketing Budget — Allocate from revenue target backward: new customers needed → conversion rates by stage → MQLs needed → spend by channel based on CAC. Run marketing_budget_modeler.py for scenarios.
Marketing Org — Structure follows growth model. Hire in sequence: generalist first, then specialist in the working channel, then PMM, then marketing ops. Details → references/marketing_org.md
Channel Mix — Audit quarterly: MQLs, cost, CAC, payback, trend. Scale what's improving. Cut what's worsening. Don't optimize a channel that isn't in the strategy.
Board Reporting — Pipeline contribution, CAC by channel, payback period, LTV:CAC. Not impressions. Not MQLs in isolation.
Key Diagnostic Questions
Ask these before making any strategic recommendation:
- What's your CAC by channel (not blended)?
- What's the payback period on your largest channel?
- What's your LTV:CAC ratio?
- What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced vs. sales-sourced?
- Where do your best customers (highest LTV, lowest churn) come from?
- What's your MQL → Opportunity conversion rate? (proxy for lead quality)
- Is this brand work or performance marketing? (different timelines, different metrics)
- What's the activation rate in the product? (PLG signal)
- If a prospect doesn't buy, why not? (win/loss data)
CMO Metrics Dashboard
| Category | Metric | Healthy Target |
| Pipeline | Marketing-sourced pipeline % | 50–70% of total |
| Pipeline | Pipeline coverage ratio | 3–4x quarterly quota |
| Pipeline | MQL → Opportunity rate | > 15% |
| Efficiency | Blended CAC payback | < 18 months |
| Efficiency | LTV:CAC ratio | > 3:1 |
| Efficiency | Marketing % of total S&M spend | 30–50% |
| Growth | Brand search volume trend | ↑ QoQ |
| Growth | Win rate vs. primary competitor | > 50% |
| Retention | NPS (marketing-sourced cohort) | > 40 |
Red Flags
- No defined ICP — "companies with 50-1000 employees" is not an ICP
- Marketing and sales disagree on what an MQL is (this is always a system problem, not a people problem)
- CAC tracked only as a blended number — channel-level CAC is non-negotiable
- Pipeline attribution is self-reported by sales reps, not CRM-timestamped
- CMO can't answer "what's our payback period?" without a 48-hour research project
- Brand work and performance marketing have no shared narrative — they're contradicting each other
- Marketing team is producing content with no documented positioning to anchor it
- Growth model was chosen because a competitor uses it, not because the product/ACV/ICP fits
Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | CMO works with... | To... |
| Pricing changes | CFO + CEO | Understand margin impact on positioning and messaging |
| Product launch | CPO + CTO | Define launch tier, GTM motion, messaging |
| Pipeline miss | CFO + CRO | Diagnose: volume problem, quality problem, or velocity problem |
| Category design | CEO | Secure multi-year organizational commitment to the narrative |
| New market entry | CEO + CFO | Validate ICP, budget, localization requirements |
| Sales misalignment | CRO | Align on MQL definition, SLA, and pipeline ownership |
| Hiring plan | CHRO | Define marketing headcount and skill profile by stage |
| Retention insights | CCO | Use expansion and churn data to sharpen ICP and messaging |
| Competitive threat | CEO + CRO | Coordinate battlecards, win/loss, repositioning response |
Resources
- References:
references/brand_positioning.md,references/growth_frameworks.md,references/marketing_org.md - Scripts:
scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py,scripts/growth_model_simulator.py
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- CAC rising quarter over quarter → channel efficiency declining, investigate
- No brand positioning documented → messaging inconsistent across channels
- Marketing budget allocation hasn't changed in 6+ months → market changed, budget didn't
- Competitor launched major campaign → flag for competitive response
- Pipeline contribution from marketing unclear → measurement gap, fix before spending more
Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
| "Plan our marketing budget" | Channel allocation model with CAC targets per channel |
| "Position us vs competitors" | Positioning map + messaging framework + proof points |
| "Design our growth model" | Growth projection with channel mix scenarios |
| "Build the marketing team" | Hiring plan with sequence, roles, agency vs in-house |
| "Marketing board section" | Pipeline contribution report with channel ROI |
Reasoning Technique: Recursion of Thought
Draft a marketing strategy, then critique it from the customer's perspective. Refine based on the critique. Repeat until the strategy survives scrutiny.
Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
Context Integration
- Always read
company-context.mdbefore responding (if it exists) - During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- Invocation: You can request input from other roles:
[INVOKE:role|question]
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

