agentleFS
darkweb19darkweb19/skills/senior-security/SKILL.md

senior-security

Skill0 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when the user asks for STRIDE threat modeling, DREAD risk scoring, data-flow-diagram threat analysis, or a quick secret scan — or when a security request needs routing to the right specialist skill (pen-testing, incident response, cloud posture, red team, AI security, threat hunting, secure code review). This skill owns threat modeling; everything else routes to a sibling.

12 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the request spans lanes (e.g., "secure this new architecture"), do the threat model here first — its output (prioritized threats + …

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Verification gate: every DFD element has ≥ 1 STRIDE row considered, every threat with DREAD ≥ 7 has an owner + mitigation, and the secret …

    line 43

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Senior Security Engineer — Threat Modeling + Security Router

This skill does exactly one job itself — STRIDE/DREAD threat modeling (plus a quick secret scan) — and routes every other security request to the specialist skill that owns that lane. Do not duplicate sibling content here; route instead.

Routing Table (read this first)

The user wants...Route toWhy that skill owns it
Vulnerability assessment, pen-test methodology, OWASP Top 10 testing../security-pen-testing/Ships vulnerability_scanner.py + dependency_auditor.py with exit-code contracts
Incident triage, SEV classification, forensics, containment../incident-response/SEV1–SEV4 taxonomy, NIST SP 800-61 phases, incident_triage.py
Production outage command (non-security incidents)../incident-commander/Severity classifier + timeline + postmortem tools
Security monitoring, CVE triage SLAs, compliance checks (SOC 2 etc.), security headers../senior-secops/security_scanner.py + compliance_checker.py, CVE SLA table
Hostile/adversarial code review../adversarial-reviewer/3-persona review with BLOCK/CONCERNS/CLEAN verdict
Secure code review as part of general review../code-reviewer/Language dispatch + regression fixtures
Cloud IAM escalation paths, S3 exposure, security groups../cloud-security/cloud_posture_check.py with per-check exit codes
Threat hunting, IOC sweeps, anomaly detection../threat-detection/z-score anomaly + IOC staleness tooling
Red-team engagement planning, ATT&CK kill chains../red-team/engagement_planner.py with authorization gate
LLM/AI attack surface (prompt injection, poisoning)../ai-security/ATLAS-mapped ai_threat_scanner.py

If the request spans lanes (e.g., "secure this new architecture"), do the threat model here first — its output (prioritized threats + mitigations) tells you which siblings to load next. Never bulk-load multiple security skills speculatively.

What This Skill Owns: STRIDE Threat Modeling

Workflow

  1. Scope: assets to protect, trust boundaries, data flows (external entities, processes, data stores, flows).
  2. Generate the threat model per component:
    python3 scripts/threat_modeler.py --component "User Authentication" --assets "credentials,sessions" --json --output threats.json
    Output: per-threat STRIDE category, DREAD score (Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected users, Discoverability — each 1–10), and suggested mitigations. Repeat per DFD element; --interactive walks scoping questions; --list-threats shows the threat database.
  3. Consume the output: sort threats.json by DREAD score descending; everything ≥ 7 average needs a named mitigation owner before the design ships. Map each mitigation to the responsible sibling lane (e.g., IAM threats → cloud-security, injection threats → code-reviewer).
  4. Quick secret sweep while you have the codebase open:
    python3 scripts/secret_scanner.py /path/to/project --format json --severity high
    20+ patterns (AWS keys, GitHub tokens, private keys, generic credentials). Any critical/high finding blocks merge until rotated and moved to a secret manager.
  5. Verification gate: every DFD element has ≥ 1 STRIDE row considered, every threat with DREAD ≥ 7 has an owner + mitigation, and the secret scan exits with zero high/critical findings. Re-run both tools after mitigations land — that re-run is the done signal, not the document.

STRIDE per Element Matrix

DFD ElementSTRIDE
External EntityXX
ProcessXXXXXX
Data StoreXXXX
Data FlowXXX

(S=Spoofing→authn, T=Tampering→integrity, R=Repudiation→audit logs, I=Info Disclosure→encryption/access control, D=DoS→rate limiting/redundancy, E=Elevation→least privilege.)

References (load on demand)

DocumentContent
references/threat-modeling-guide.mdSTRIDE methodology, attack trees, DREAD scoring, DFD creation
references/security-architecture-patterns.mdZero Trust, defense-in-depth, authentication patterns, API security
references/cryptography-implementation.mdAES-GCM, Ed25519, password hashing (Argon2id), key management

The architecture and crypto references are kept because no sibling ships them; for operating those controls (scanning, compliance, monitoring) still route to senior-secops.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.