known-defect-disposition
Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Severity controls response urgency; it does not authorize neglect. A P0/P1 earns immediate review — but P2/P3/P4 remain known defects requiring disposition, not a silent backlog, and before anything is deferred its severity must be re-tested under interaction, composition, adversarial control, and deployment context, because initial severity usually scores the finding in isolation while the real exposure is reachable only in combination. Use whenever a finding, bug, or audit result is being triaged by priority tier, whenever the phrase "not blocking current work" is used to justify not fixing something, and whenever time runs out before every finding is addressed. Trigger on "P2/P3/P4", "low severity, deferring", "not blocking, ship it", "we'll get to it later", "known issue, out of scope for now", or any triage pass that assigns a tier without asking whether that tier survives composition. Composes with debt-closure-discipline (the three terminal states this skill's gate feeds into) and assume-breach-modeling (the chaining method the escalation questions reuse). It does not lower your bar for what counts as P0 — it raises your bar for what you're allowed to call P3 without having checked.
In this repository91 other files it gives its agents.
- abductive-engineeringSkill
- acquisition-order-of-volatilitySkill
- agent-trust-boundariesSkill
- alert-triage-economicsSkill
- assume-breach-modelingSkill
- atomic-state-mutationSkill
- attack-surface-triageSkill
- audit-before-patchSkill
- authorization-surface-mappingSkill
- beyond-the-fixSkill
- beyond-the-sinkSkill
- claim-provenance-disciplineSkill
- client-side-trust-boundarySkill
- cloud-architecture-selectionSkill
- cloud-control-plane-reasoningSkill
- codebase-health-assessmentSkill
- concurrency-reasoningSkill
- container-trust-boundarySkill
- containment-under-uncertaintySkill
- control-effectiveness-vs-existenceSkill
- credential-material-triageSkill
- crypto-misuse-reasoningSkill
- data-leakage-huntingSkill
- data-provenance-mappingSkill
- daubert-defensible-writingSkill
- debt-closure-disciplineSkill
- deception-signal-qualitySkill
- decision-record-disciplineSkill
- dependency-provenanceSkill
- destination-driven-constructionSkill
- detection-engineeringSkill
- deterministic-coreSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- discriminating-proofSkill
- distributed-write-atomicitySkill
- dont-fall-in-love-with-the-bugSkill
- dual-use-behavior-adjudicationSkill
- exploitability-triageSkill
- falsifiable-testingSkill
- finding-custodySkill
- forensic-logging-designSkill
- forensic-persistenceSkill
- frontend-accessibility-by-constructionSkill
- frontend-component-boundariesSkill
- frontend-performance-budgetsSkill
- frontend-testing-strategySkill
- git-disciplineSkill
- honest-degradationSkill
- honest-technical-oratorySkill
- hypothesis-driven-huntingSkill
- incident-timeline-reconstructionSkill
- intel-source-evaluationSkill
- invariant-huntingSkill
- irreversible-action-gateSkill
- language-selectionSkill
- live-contract-compatibilitySkill
- llm-out-of-the-loopSkill
- model-evaluation-disciplineSkill
- non-overwhelming-uxSkill
- oracle-driven-fuzzingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

