data-provenance-mapping
Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
You cannot protect, delete, or report on data whose flow you have not mapped — a "delete my data" request, a breach-scope estimate, or a "we don't store PII" claim is only as true as your knowledge of where the data actually went, and it always went further than the schema says: into backups, logs, caches, analytics, data warehouses, search indexes, third-party processors, exports, and derived features. Use whenever the question is where sensitive data lives or goes: "handle this DSAR / right-to-be-forgotten", "did we delete all their data", "what's the blast radius of this breach", "do we store PII", "is this anonymized", "map our data flows", "privacy impact assessment", "we log the request body", "we sent it to this vendor", "GDPR/CCPA data mapping". Sibling of claim-provenance-discipline (a data-handling claim must carry where the data actually is) and credential-material-triage (the "where does it still persist after you rotated it" move, applied to PII); it maps the real flow, not the intended one. It does not write the privacy policy or the deletion job, and never accepts the architecture diagram as evidence of where the data actually went.
In this repository91 other files it gives its agents.
- abductive-engineeringSkill
- acquisition-order-of-volatilitySkill
- agent-trust-boundariesSkill
- alert-triage-economicsSkill
- assume-breach-modelingSkill
- atomic-state-mutationSkill
- attack-surface-triageSkill
- audit-before-patchSkill
- authorization-surface-mappingSkill
- beyond-the-fixSkill
- beyond-the-sinkSkill
- claim-provenance-disciplineSkill
- client-side-trust-boundarySkill
- cloud-architecture-selectionSkill
- cloud-control-plane-reasoningSkill
- codebase-health-assessmentSkill
- concurrency-reasoningSkill
- container-trust-boundarySkill
- containment-under-uncertaintySkill
- control-effectiveness-vs-existenceSkill
- credential-material-triageSkill
- crypto-misuse-reasoningSkill
- data-leakage-huntingSkill
- daubert-defensible-writingSkill
- debt-closure-disciplineSkill
- deception-signal-qualitySkill
- decision-record-disciplineSkill
- dependency-provenanceSkill
- destination-driven-constructionSkill
- detection-engineeringSkill
- deterministic-coreSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- discriminating-proofSkill
- distributed-write-atomicitySkill
- dont-fall-in-love-with-the-bugSkill
- dual-use-behavior-adjudicationSkill
- exploitability-triageSkill
- falsifiable-testingSkill
- finding-custodySkill
- forensic-logging-designSkill
- forensic-persistenceSkill
- frontend-accessibility-by-constructionSkill
- frontend-component-boundariesSkill
- frontend-performance-budgetsSkill
- frontend-testing-strategySkill
- git-disciplineSkill
- honest-degradationSkill
- honest-technical-oratorySkill
- hypothesis-driven-huntingSkill
- incident-timeline-reconstructionSkill
- intel-source-evaluationSkill
- invariant-huntingSkill
- irreversible-action-gateSkill
- known-defect-dispositionSkill
- language-selectionSkill
- live-contract-compatibilitySkill
- llm-out-of-the-loopSkill
- model-evaluation-disciplineSkill
- non-overwhelming-uxSkill
- oracle-driven-fuzzingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

