agentleFS
annatchijovaannatchijova/SKILLS/alert-triage-economics/SKILL.md

alert-triage-economics

Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Triage a security alert queue by expected loss, not by the severity label the tool stamped — because analyst attention is a scarce, exhaustible resource and a SOC's real failure is not a missed rule but a queue that trains its analysts to dismiss. Use whenever there is a backlog of alerts to prioritize, a "we get 10,000 alerts a day" problem, a decision about which detections to keep, or a claim that a queue is "under control": "which alerts do we work first", "we're drowning in alerts", "alert fatigue", "too many false positives", "should we even keep this rule", "the SOC missed it but the alert did fire", "tune the queue". Sibling of detection-engineering (which builds the rule that fires) and dual-use-behavior-adjudication (which decides what one firing means); this skill governs how a finite team spends attention across many firings. It does not write detection logic or adjudicate a single alert in isolation, and never treats a tool's severity field as a priority.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.