agentleFS
annatchijovaannatchijova/SKILLS/exploitability-triage/SKILL.md

exploitability-triage

Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Turn a scanner hit or a CVSS score into a real risk decision by proving, in this deployment, that the vulnerable code is reachable, reached by attacker-controlled input, and exploitable given the mitigations actually in place — because "could be exploited" is not "is exposed" and a version match is not a vulnerability. Use whenever a vulnerability needs prioritizing: "we have 4,000 criticals", "is this CVE exploitable here", "should we patch this now", "the scanner flagged", "dependabot opened 40 alerts", "what's our actual risk from Log4Shell/this-CVE", "reachability", "is this exploitable in our config". Sibling of beyond-the-sink (which refuses to trust the scanner's map) and dependency-provenance (which knows what you actually run); ranks by exposure, not by severity field. It does not write the patch or the exploit, and never certifies a vulnerability exploitable — or safe — without stating what it checked.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.