agentleFS
annatchijovaannatchijova/SKILLS/detection-engineering/SKILL.md

detection-engineering

Skill9 starsChanged 4 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Turn a detection requirement into a deployed, tested, versioned rule — with a benign twin that must NOT fire, an explicit false-positive budget, a volume estimate before deploy, and a tuning history that records every silently narrowed scope. Use whenever the user writes or reviews an alert, a Sigma/KQL/SPL/EQL/YARA rule, a SIEM correlation search, a WAF or EDR policy, an anomaly threshold, or a monitor that pages someone; whenever they say "write a rule for this", "alert when X", "we're getting too many alerts", "tune this detection", "why didn't this fire", "detection as code", or "add a monitor"; and whenever a purple-team gap needs closing. Sibling of purple-team-exercise — that skill specifies WHAT must be caught, this one builds and proves the thing that catches it. It does not run exercises, does not triage incidents, and never claims coverage from a rule that has not fired on a real true positive.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.