forge
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Mine session history (00 - Chats/, daily notes, brainstorms) for prompting patterns that recur 3+ times across separate sessions. Propose them as new skills, rules, or specialists. Use when Andy says forge, mine the sessions, what patterns am I repeating, find skill candidates, what should be a skill.
78 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- faizanio/FORGEtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jeanchristoph/claude_forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- pche-broken-artist/forge-of-thoughttheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- rmkr/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- flopperj/dotfiles-coretheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use forge-ship, forge-review and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
redteamlifeSkillforge-ship
Use when the user asks to merge, release, promote, reconcile, or close out work in a repo containing `docs/forge/` or governed by FORGE. Not for per-task commits; those complete inside forge-execute-task.
Also in 6 projects that use this
tonmoy007Skillforge-review
Run a multi-dimensional parallel code review over the current change.
Also in 8 projects that use this
weselbenSkillforge-docs
Load before code changes, before writing docs or an ADR, when a user question exposes a missing how-to, and when closing a chunk of work; also loaded by forge after each squash-merge and by deep-research after a report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DailenGSkillforge-design
Design, UX, and polish discipline for the forge lifecycle. Covers the design tier, the design brief in docs/DESIGN.md, UX requirements and their verification methods, the per-slice design pass, the UX defect register, and the release polish pass. Load whenever work touches a user-facing surface (GUI, terminal, library API, or operated service), whenever a UX observation needs disposing of, and whenever a release is in reach.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DshamirSkillforge-plan
Takes analysis.json + budget cap → derives the full phase sequence, hyperparameters, instance type, cost estimate, and acceptance thresholds. Emits plan.md (the single human gate document) and plan.json (the machine-readable spec that dispatch-v2 consumes). Refuses to plan if estimated cost exceeds budget×1.2.
Also in 4 projects that use this
tonmoy007Skillforge-build
Run Stage 6 of the Forge pipeline — implementation. Use when the user says
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions78 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 78
- cwinvestments/memstack★ 425same name
- ansari-project/codev★ 298same name
- cluesmith/codev★ 298same name
- swyxio/skills★ 194same name
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- alp82/forge★ 36same name
- TT-Wang/forge★ 34same name
- emiliosheinz/agent-skills★ 20same name
- MetalLegBob/solana-vibes-kit★ 19same name
- kecoma1/MQL5-SKILLS★ 17same name
68 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- brainstormSkill
- commit-message-writerSkill
- compile-topicSkill
- course-builderSkill
- daily-note-writerSkill
- deck-builderSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- drift-fixSkill
- git-bootstrapSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- lesson-content-writerSkill
- project-scaffolderSkill
- prototypeSkill
- retroSkill
- reviveSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- specialist-creatorSkill
- sweep-inboxSkill
- tddSkill
- to-issuesSkill
- to-prdSkill
- triageSkill
- workflow-authorSkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 67 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 50
Write a forge report to 01 - Daily Notes/<YYYY-MM-DD> - Forge Report.md:
- Very specific: line 78
Don't auto-create the skill/rule/specialist — Andy approves the promotion
- Very specific: line 80
If approved, hand off to the relevant creator skill (/specialist-creator for specialists, direct edits to setup-claude-skills.ps1 for new …
- Distinctive: line 83
Don't propose patterns that already exist (re-check the registry before reporting)
- Distinctive: line 84
Don't propose anything that recurred only in one mega-session — that's narrowness, not pattern strength
- Distinctive: line 85
Don't auto-promote — promotion is Andy's choice, you propose
- Distinctive: line 86
Don't include the full source quotes — distill to the pattern, link to source
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 67 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Forge
Cross-session pattern detector. Scans Andy's recent session history for patterns that have recurred enough to deserve promotion into a skill, rule, or specialist. Inspired by the FORGE archetype from the /goal video — the system-level version of the TCE evolution rule (add a symbol when it's been explained 3+ times).
When to use
Triggers: forge, mine the sessions, what patterns am I repeating, find skill candidates, what should be a skill, promote a pattern.
Best run after a substantive working week, or before a quarterly drift audit. The /retro skill captures lessons from ONE session; /forge looks ACROSS sessions.
Load
03 - Skills & Rules/Rules/engineering-doctrine.md- research-first habits00 - Chats/- session summaries (not full transcripts — those are too noisy)00 - Chats/brainstorms/- past brainstorms00 - Chats/handoffs/- past handoff notes01 - Daily Notes/- last 30 days03 - Skills & Rules/Agents/Activity Log.md- last ~50 rows- Current skills list at
.claude/skills/(don't re-propose what exists)
Run
Phase 0 — Survey
Walk the source corpus. For each chat / brainstorm / daily note / activity row, extract: what task was being done, what instructions Andy gave repeatedly, what corrections he made, what manual steps recurred.
Phase 1 — Pattern detection
Cluster by similarity. A pattern qualifies as a candidate when:
- It appears in ≥3 separate sessions (different days, different contexts)
- It involves a workflow that took multiple turns to describe
- Andy's correction pattern is similar across the instances
- A skill could meaningfully wrap it (not just trivial 1-line ops)
Phase 2 — Propose
Group candidates by promotion target:
| Promotion | When |
| New skill | The pattern is invocable via a trigger phrase + has a clear inputs→outputs shape |
| New rule | The pattern is a recurring habit / convention (not invocation-shaped) |
| New specialist | The pattern has enough scope + judgment to warrant its own agent |
| Extension to existing skill/specialist | The pattern is a feature gap in something we already have |
| No promotion | Pattern recurs but doesn't earn a slot (under 3 hits, or pattern is too narrow) |
Output
Write a forge report to 01 - Daily Notes/<YYYY-MM-DD> - Forge Report.md:
---
type: forge-report
created: <MM-DD-YY>
sessions_scanned: <count>
candidates_found: <count>
candidates_proposed: <count>
tags: [forge, doctrine-evolution]
---
# Forge Report -- <MM-DD-YY>
## Candidates proposed
| Pattern | Recurrence | Promotion target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| <one-line description> | <N sessions> | new skill /<name> | <why> |
## Candidates rejected (under threshold)
- <pattern>: only <N> hits, watch for more
## Recommended next action
- <which candidate to build first, why>After
- Surface the top 1-3 candidates with concrete proposals for what they'd look like
- Don't auto-create the skill/rule/specialist — Andy approves the promotion
- Append Activity Log row
- If approved, hand off to the relevant creator skill (
/specialist-creatorfor specialists, direct edits tosetup-claude-skills.ps1for new skills, direct edits toRules/for new rules)
Don't
- Don't propose patterns that already exist (re-check the registry before reporting)
- Don't propose anything that recurred only in one mega-session — that's narrowness, not pattern strength
- Don't auto-promote — promotion is Andy's choice, you propose
- Don't include the full source quotes — distill to the pattern, link to source
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

