revive
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Scan every project in 02 - Projects/ (and follow path: frontmatter to on-disk location), check git activity, surface dormant projects with one-page resurrection plans. Use when Andy says revive, resurrect, dormant projects, what projects could I pick back up, find stalled work.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- GeiserX/sstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DrishtantKaushal/Revivetheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- GeiserX/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- GeiserX/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- RubyEyedReaper/Odin-Skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use docs-loop, full-loop and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GeiserXSkilldocs-loop
Use when the user asks to audit docs, check documentation for stale claims, or verify docs against the code.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GeiserXSkillfull-loop
Drive a repository to done with sergio-loop, then keep improving it with refine-loop at a descending theta. Use only when the user explicitly invokes full-loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
joris887Skillrefine-loop
Use when the user wants iterative self-improvement on a deliverable (document, implementation, prompt, design) until completion criteria are met.
Also in 3 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkillkb-review
Review a Bedrock Knowledge Base or RAG pipeline: chunking, retrieval quality, recall@5 and cost per query.
Also in 3 projects that use this
assisjpSkillfile-pr
Prepare and open or update an authorized pull request with a concise problem-first description and verifiable evidence. Use when the user asks to create, file, open, or update a PR. Do not use merely to review a diff or when publication is not authorized.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from GeiserX
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- GeiserX/agent-skills★ 5same name
- GeiserX/claude-skills★ 5same name
- GeiserX/sstack★ 5same name
- DrishtantKaushal/Revive★ 1same name
- RubyEyedReaper/Odin-Skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- brainstormSkill
- commit-message-writerSkill
- compile-topicSkill
- course-builderSkill
- daily-note-writerSkill
- deck-builderSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- drift-fixSkill
- forgeSkill
- git-bootstrapSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- lesson-content-writerSkill
- project-scaffolderSkill
- prototypeSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- specialist-creatorSkill
- sweep-inboxSkill
- tddSkill
- to-issuesSkill
- to-prdSkill
- triageSkill
- workflow-authorSkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Read the pointer note
- Very specific: line 32
Check for README.md, ROADMAP.md, NEXT-SESSION-HANDOFF.md — these are resurrection material
- Distinctive: line 33
Look for tests / scripts that might still run
- Very specific: line 56
Write a revive report to 01 - Daily Notes/<YYYY-MM-DD> - Revive Report.md:
- Distinctive: line 97
Don't auto-resume — Andy chooses what to pick up
- Very specific: line 98
If Andy picks a candidate, hand off to /project-scaffolder if scaffolding is needed, or just open the project's path
- Distinctive: line 102
Don't propose reviving archived projects unless Andy explicitly asks
- Distinctive: line 103
Don't auto-delete stub pointer notes — surface them, let Andy decide
- Distinctive: line 104
Don't grade projects by line count — small-but-shipped beats big-but-stalled
- Very specific: line 105
Don't ignore the path: frontmatter — projects live on disk, not in the vault
- Distinctive: line 106
Don't run on every project list at once if there are >20 — paginate the report
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Revive
Inspired by the REVIVE archetype from the /goal video. Walks every project in the vault, follows the frontmatter path: field to its on-disk location, checks git activity + remaining tests + last-edited dates, and surfaces dormant projects with concrete one-page resurrection plans.
When to use
Triggers: revive, resurrect, dormant projects, what projects could I pick back up, find stalled work, what have I been ignoring.
Best run quarterly or when Andy is between major sprints and wants to scan for next-up candidates.
Load
02 - Projects/- all project pointer notes (each haspath:frontmatter)Projects-Index.md- the auto-rolled listCLAUDE.md- drive map for context on where projects live- For each project: the on-disk folder per
path:field
Run
Phase 0 — Inventory
List every 02 - Projects/<category>/<project>.md with: status (from frontmatter), category, path on disk.
Phase 1 — Per-project scan
For each project:
- Read the pointer note
- Visit
path:location on disk git log -1for last commit date- Count files in the project folder (rough scope signal)
- Check for
README.md,ROADMAP.md,NEXT-SESSION-HANDOFF.md— these are resurrection material - Look for tests / scripts that might still run
Phase 2 — Classify
| Classification | Criteria |
| Active | Frontmatter status: active AND last commit within 30 days |
| Recently dormant | Last commit 30-90 days ago. Easy revival. |
| Cold dormant | Last commit 90-365 days ago. Resurrection takes context-loading effort. |
| Archived | Frontmatter status: archived OR no commits in >1 year. Leave alone unless Andy asks. |
| Stub | Pointer note exists but on-disk path is empty / missing. Either delete the stub or scaffold. |
Phase 3 — Resurrection plan (recently/cold dormant only)
For each dormant candidate, produce a one-paragraph plan:
- State at pause — what was the last thing being worked on (from last commit message + latest README/ROADMAP)
- First move to resume — the single most useful 30-minute action to get unstuck
- What's at risk if not revived — does this depend on something that's bit-rotting?
- Suggested model + skill —
/goalif the resumption is iterative; direct work if it's a single step
Output
Write a revive report to 01 - Daily Notes/<YYYY-MM-DD> - Revive Report.md:
---
type: revive-report
created: <MM-DD-YY>
projects_scanned: <count>
active: <count>
recently_dormant: <count>
cold_dormant: <count>
archived: <count>
stubs: <count>
tags: [revive, projects]
---
# Revive Report -- <MM-DD-YY>
## Recommended pickups (ordered by ease + value)
### 1. <project-name>
- **Status:** recently dormant (last commit MM-DD-YY)
- **State at pause:** <one line>
- **First move:** <30-min action>
- **Risk:** <low/medium/high>
- **Suggested approach:** <model + skill>
### 2. <project-name>
...
## Cold dormant (revival possible but costly)
- <project>: <reason it might still matter>
## Stubs to resolve
- <project>: pointer note at <path> but on-disk path missing. Delete or scaffold?
## Leave alone (archived)
- <project>: <reason>After
- Surface the top 1-3 pickup candidates with their first moves
- Don't auto-resume — Andy chooses what to pick up
- If Andy picks a candidate, hand off to
/project-scaffolderif scaffolding is needed, or just open the project's path - Append Activity Log row
Don't
- Don't propose reviving archived projects unless Andy explicitly asks
- Don't auto-delete stub pointer notes — surface them, let Andy decide
- Don't grade projects by line count — small-but-shipped beats big-but-stalled
- Don't ignore the
path:frontmatter — projects live on disk, not in the vault - Don't run on every project list at once if there are >20 — paginate the report
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

