community-engagement-plan
Skill417 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a team needs a deliberate, human-led plan for participating in comments, communities, or audience conversations around an approved topic. Trigger phrases include "plan community engagement", "how should we join this conversation?", "what should we reply to?", "make an engagement playbook", and "how do we support this community?". Do not use this to automate unsolicited replies, manipulate conversations, impersonate people, or create comment copy at scale; use comment-responder for a specific approved reply and social-listening to analyse recurring themes.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-hook-testerSkill
- agent-reachSkill
- ai-brainSkill
- analytics-readoutSkill
- audience-personasSkill
- best-time-schedulerSkill
- bio-profile-optimizerSkill
- b-roll-shot-listSkill
- campaign-briefSkill
- caption-and-hashtagsSkill
- carousel-builderSkill
- collab-outreachSkill
- comment-miningSkill
- comment-responderSkill
- competitor-positioningSkill
- competitor-teardownSkill
- content-auditSkill
- content-calendarSkill
- content-factorySkill
- content-pillar-builderSkill
- content-repurposerSkill
- content-researchSkill
- cover-thumbnail-briefSkill
- creator-outreachSkill
- cross-platform-distributionSkill
- cross-platform-reformatterSkill
- cta-writerSkill
- dm-script-writerSkill
- going-viralSkill
- hashtag-keyword-researchSkill
- hook-miningSkill
- humanizerSkill
- influencer-partnershipsSkill
- launch-retrospectiveSkill
- linkedin-thought-leadershipSkill
- on-screen-text-writerSkill
- paid-social-briefSkill
- positioning-auditSkill
- profile-conversion-auditSkill
- reel-analyzerSkill
- reel-builderSkill
- reel-scripterSkill
- series-plannerSkill
- social-analytics-reportSkill
- social-listeningSkill
- social-proof-miningSkill
- story-sequencerSkill
- trend-spotterSkill
- ugc-creator-briefSkill
- utm-campaign-planSkill
- viral-carouselSkill
- viral-hook-writerSkill
- viralitySkill
- x-thread-strategySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Ask which owned or external community is in scope, its rules, the team's legitimate role, the topic, and any moderator or brand constraints.
- Distinctive: line 16
Use real questions, recurring friction, useful resources, corrections, and support needs as evidence.
- Distinctive: line 28
Never automate unsolicited replies, direct messages, follows, or engagement.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not misrepresent an employee, customer, or independent community member.
- Distinctive: line 30
Follow each community's rules and moderator direction.
- Distinctive: line 31
Do not reveal private account, customer, or support information in public conversation.
- Distinctive: line 32
Avoid argumentative pile-ons, engagement bait, and opportunistic promotion during sensitive events.
- Distinctive: line 45
Use social-listening to identify recurring questions and comment-responder for a particular reply.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Community Engagement Plan
Set a useful participation standard: where the team can add value, what it can truthfully say, and when it should not speak.
1. Define the community and permission boundary
Ask which owned or external community is in scope, its rules, the team's legitimate role, the topic, and any moderator or brand constraints. Read supplied rules before proposing interaction. If the community does not welcome promotion or brand participation, do not design a workaround.
2. Identify contribution opportunities
Use real questions, recurring friction, useful resources, corrections, and support needs as evidence. Classify participation as answer, clarification, acknowledgement, escalation, or observation. Give priority to helping people complete a task, not inserting the brand into every thread.
3. Establish response boundaries and routing
Define approved facts, prohibited claims, tone, disclosure, escalation owners, response windows, and cases that require silence or human review. Route product bugs, safety concerns, account-specific issues, legal questions, and hostile interactions to the appropriate owner rather than improvising publicly.
4. Run a light learning loop
Set a small cadence to review unanswered questions, recurring themes, and useful contributions. Capture aggregate learning for social-listening. Measure quality through resolved questions, informed feedback, and community trust signals where available, not reply volume alone.
Hard rules
- Never automate unsolicited replies, direct messages, follows, or engagement.
- Do not misrepresent an employee, customer, or independent community member.
- Follow each community's rules and moderator direction; leave when asked.
- Do not reveal private account, customer, or support information in public conversation.
- Avoid argumentative pile-ons, engagement bait, and opportunistic promotion during sensitive events.
Failure modes
| Failure | Do this instead |
| The plan is "reply to everything" | Define situations where the team can add real value and where it should observe. |
| A public reply attempts to solve a private account issue | Acknowledge the issue and route through the approved support path. |
| Replies become repetitive promotion | Lead with the user's question, resource, or correction rather than the product. |
| Community rules are discovered after posting | Review rules and obtain required permission before engaging. |
Where it sits
Use social-listening to identify recurring questions and comment-responder for a particular reply. Use campaign-brief only when a campaign has a legitimate community role. Feed patterns into audience-personas and positioning-audit; never treat a community plan as a mass-outreach mechanism.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

