cowork-calendar-defrag
Skill378 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit your calendar with Cowork's calendar tools -- measure meeting load and fragmentation, identify which recurring meetings earn their slot, propose consolidations and focus blocks, and draft the diplomatic messages that reclaim your week.
In this repository229 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- agent-armySkill
- agent-eval-harnessSkill
- agent-swarm-deployerSkill
- agent-team-builderSkill
- agent-to-agentSkill
- ai-coding-guardrailsSkill
- ai-readiness-assessmentSkill
- animateSkill
- api-documentation-writerSkill
- api-endpoint-scaffolderSkill
- api-load-testerSkill
- athlete-social-media-managerSkill
- before-you-buildSkill
- bi-measure-builderSkill
- board-deck-generatorSkill
- bookkeeping-closeSkill
- bracket-predictorSkill
- brand-consistency-checkerSkill
- brand-voice-analyzerSkill
- browser-test-loopSkill
- budget-optimizerSkill
- cash-flow-forecasterSkill
- champion-identifierSkill
- churn-autopsySkill
- claude-design-criticSkill
- claude-design-system-architectSkill
- claude-landing-composerSkill
- claude-md-writerSkill
- client-health-dashboardSkill
- client-proposal-generatorSkill
- code-review-proSkill
- cold-email-sequence-generatorSkill
- color-palette-extractorSkill
- commercial-lease-analyzerSkill
- company-announcement-writerSkill
- competitor-content-analyzerSkill
- competitor-intel-agentSkill
- competitor-price-trackerSkill
- compliance-checkerSkill
- contact-hunterSkill
- content-repurposerSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- contract-analyzerSkill
- contract-redlinerSkill
- conversation-archaeologistSkill
- cowork-contract-renewal-radarSkill
- cowork-data-room-builderSkill
- cowork-deal-roomSkill
- cowork-expense-auditSkill
- cowork-folder-organizerSkill
- cowork-hiring-screenerSkill
- cowork-home-inventorySkill
- cowork-inbox-triageSkill
- cowork-invoice-chaserSkill
- cowork-medical-bill-auditorSkill
- cowork-qbr-builderSkill
- cowork-rfp-responseSkill
- cowork-sop-writerSkill
- cowork-tax-prep-organizerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Execute on approval: Create the focus blocks (marked busy, named for the work), send nothing -- updated invites and messages remain drafts …
- Distinctive: line 22
Read freely, write only what was approved, send nothing.
- Distinctive: line 23
Never propose cutting external, client, or 1:1-with-manager meetings unless the user asked for a full-scope review.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cowork Calendar Defrag
Treat the calendar like a disk that needs defragmenting: measure what is actually there, identify waste, consolidate, and carve out contiguous space for real work. Uses the connected calendar tools (Microsoft 365 / Google Calendar) to read events; every change is proposed, and the human approves before anything is created, moved, or declined.
Workflow
- Measure. Pull the last 4 weeks and the next 2. Compute: hours in meetings per week, longest uninterrupted block per day, fragmentation score (count of gaps under 45 minutes -- too short to do real work, long enough to lose), meetings by type (recurring vs. ad hoc, internal vs. external), and after-hours creep.
- Score the recurring load. For each recurring meeting: duration x frequency x attendee count = weekly cost. Flag candidates against the classic tells -- no agenda in the invite, attendance optional-in-practice, could-be-async status updates, double-booked slots the user routinely skips. External and client meetings are measured but never flagged for cuts without explicit instruction.
- Propose the defrag. A specific plan, not principles: which recurrings to shorten (60 -> 25), consolidate (three 1:1s into office hours), make async, or leave alone; where the 2-3 weekly focus blocks go (matched to when the calendar shows the user actually has energy-adjacent free space, e.g. mornings); and which small gaps to close by nudging meetings adjacent.
- Draft the messages. For each proposed change involving other people: a short, warm, blame-free draft ("I'm consolidating my recurring syncs -- can we fold this into..."). The awkward message is the real barrier to a better calendar; remove it.
- Execute on approval. Create the focus blocks (marked busy, named for the work), send nothing -- updated invites and messages remain drafts for the human to send. Output
calendar-defrag-report.mdwith before/after metrics: meeting hours reclaimed, longest block gained.
Rules
- Read freely, write only what was approved, send nothing. Calendars are shared surfaces; a wrong move is publicly visible.
- Never propose cutting external, client, or 1:1-with-manager meetings unless the user asked for a full-scope review.
- Fragmentation is the enemy, not meetings. Six hours of meetings in two blocks beats four hours scattered across nine slots.
- Focus blocks get names ("Proposal writing") -- anonymous "Busy" blocks get scheduled over within two weeks.
- Respect the user's stated no-touch zones (school pickup, gym, standing personal events) as hard constraints.
- Re-run comparisons honestly: if the defrag did not hold (blocks got booked over), report it and diagnose which changes stuck.
Scheduled Mode
As a monthly Cowork scheduled task: re-measure, compare against the last report, flag regression (creeping recurrings, eroded focus blocks), and propose the next round of cuts.
Quick Commands
- "Audit my calendar" -- steps 1-2, the measurement and scorecard
- "Defrag my week" -- full workflow
- "Where can I fit 3 hours of deep work?" -- focus-block placement only
- "Draft the decline for [meeting]" -- one diplomatic message
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

