openbim-ifc-coordination
Skill39 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
Plan and review openBIM interoperability using IFC, BCF, IDS, bSDD and IfcOpenShell/Bonsai workflows. Use for IFC export/import, model audit, spatial structure, property sets, quantities, model federation, issue exchange, information requirements and cross-platform BIM coordination.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectural-drawing-generationSkill
- architecture-orchestratorSkill
- architecture-programmingSkill
- architecture-red-teamSkill
- area-quantity-auditSkill
- autocad-dwg-workflowSkill
- building-envelope-performanceSkill
- cad-bim-automationSkill
- civil-site-designSkill
- concept-design-reviewSkill
- concept-schematic-designSkill
- construction-administrationSkill
- construction-documentationSkill
- cost-planning-value-engineeringSkill
- drawing-qaSkill
- handover-fm-postoccupancySkill
- interior-fitout-designSkill
- life-safety-accessibilitySkill
- materials-specificationsSkill
- mep-coordinationSkill
- precedent-researchSkill
- presentation-reviewSkill
- revit-workflowSkill
- rhino-grasshopper-workflowSkill
- site-analysis-feasibilitySkill
- site-regulation-researchSkill
- structural-coordinationSkill
- sustainability-daylight-energySkill
- visualization-renderingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Treat IFC as structured building data, not just geometry.
- Very specific: line 15
Keep verified facts, project assumptions, design options, and unresolved questions visibly separate.
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not invent IFC property requirements or claim IDS validates geometry.
- Distinctive: line 45
If the native application is unavailable, produce a reproducible plan, script, structured data, SVG/DXF artifact, or exact in-application …
- Distinctive: line 61
Use an owner-selected persistent globally unique project identity.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
openBIM / IFC Coordination
Treat IFC as structured building data, not just geometry. Preserve GUIDs, schema/version, units, spatial containment, classifications, properties and issue traceability.
Preflight
- IFC schema/MVD or exchange target, authoring tool/version, coordinate strategy, model purpose, information requirements and receiving software.
- Federation disciplines, file/revision IDs, BCF/issue workflow, classification/property requirements and IDS when available.
Keep verified facts, project assumptions, design options, and unresolved questions visibly separate. If a required input is absent, record it as UNKNOWN rather than inventing it.
Workflow
- Inventory project/site/building/storey/space structure, element counts, GUID stability, units, coordinates and schema.
- Validate required classes/properties/classifications/materials/quantities against project requirements or IDS; remember IDS checks alphanumeric information, not geometry.
- Federate and clash/issue-coordinate with BCF-style identifiers rather than screenshots alone; preserve issue status and viewpoints.
- Round-trip sample exchanges before full delivery; compare element counts, GUIDs, property sets, geometry extents and quantities.
Deliverables
- IFC exchange/validation plan
- Information requirement or IDS mapping
- Federation/BCF issue register
- Round-trip verification report
Verification
- Schema, units, coordinates, GUIDs and spatial hierarchy are explicit and checked.
- Export success is not treated as interoperability success until the receiving workflow is tested.
For file/model changes, compare the result against a pre-change baseline and report changed items, skipped items, failures, and checks actually run.
Professional boundaries
- Do not invent IFC property requirements or claim IDS validates geometry.
- Third-party BIM/MCP tools are optional and must be reviewed before granting write access.
If a live CAD/BIM/GIS/analysis tool or MCP integration is available, inspect the current document/model and tool version before write operations. Prefer read-only inspection, dry runs, bounded samples, new output paths, and native undo/transaction mechanisms. Never claim a model or drawing was changed unless the tool confirms it.
If the native application is unavailable, produce a reproducible plan, script, structured data, SVG/DXF artifact, or exact in-application procedure instead of pretending to have operated the software.
Optional Gridline source-bound IFC4 exchange
Discover the installed architectural-drawing-generation skill before invoking
its own scripts/component_ifc.py; report a missing dependency rather than
inventing a path. The bounded exporter requires IfcOpenShell 0.9.0.post1 plus pytest
for actual EXPRESS validation, a selected signed state database, explicit matching
project requirements and separately trusted native receipt/owner-key pins. It
checks typed source/units/spatial/room/material/quantity/host/void/filling data,
raw and independently evaluated geometry, and stable source mappings. Public
--verify additionally requires the retained IFC receipt pin and preserves
published bytes. Read its command help, optional requirements and source/licensing
boundaries first; no dependency is automatically installed.
Use an owner-selected persistent globally unique project identity. The accepted synthetic fixture and its minimal provenance requirements are not a client's IDS, certified MVD or regulatory brief. Unsupported requirements, unknown mandatory materials or missing source approvals block export. Report the actual checked scope and all receiving-client/IDS/professional gaps. IFC maps material identities; packed photographic PBR remains in Blender/GLB. This file-only pipeline grants no live-host edit permissions and does not close every #13/#15 interoperability or transaction criterion.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

