drawing-qa
Skill39 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
QA architectural drawing sets for cross-sheet coordination, annotations, dimensions, references, naming, revisions, schedules, and print/readability issues. Use for PDFs, exported drawings, and issue sets.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectural-drawing-generationSkill
- architecture-orchestratorSkill
- architecture-programmingSkill
- architecture-red-teamSkill
- area-quantity-auditSkill
- autocad-dwg-workflowSkill
- building-envelope-performanceSkill
- cad-bim-automationSkill
- civil-site-designSkill
- concept-design-reviewSkill
- concept-schematic-designSkill
- construction-administrationSkill
- construction-documentationSkill
- cost-planning-value-engineeringSkill
- handover-fm-postoccupancySkill
- interior-fitout-designSkill
- life-safety-accessibilitySkill
- materials-specificationsSkill
- mep-coordinationSkill
- openbim-ifc-coordinationSkill
- precedent-researchSkill
- presentation-reviewSkill
- revit-workflowSkill
- rhino-grasshopper-workflowSkill
- site-analysis-feasibilitySkill
- site-regulation-researchSkill
- structural-coordinationSkill
- sustainability-daylight-energySkill
- visualization-renderingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Check title blocks/revisions.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not label a design noncompliant without verified applicable rules.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Drawing QA
Check title blocks/revisions; references and callouts; grids/levels/north/scales/units; key and conflicting dimensions; room data; door/window tags and schedules; materials/legends/notes; plan/elevation/section consistency; missing/duplicate sheets; obvious coordination risks; and print/readability.
Finding format:
ID | file/sheet | location | category | observation | evidence | impact | confidence | next action
Severity: Blocker prevents reliable issue/use; Major implies likely coordination/compliance/construction impact; Minor is documentation/readability.
Do not label a design noncompliant without verified applicable rules.
On-demand evidence and practice references
Load only the relevant reference. These are original review prompts, not binding code or full-book extraction.
- B04: section coordination
- B06: drawing standards
- B07: residential detail indexing
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.