agentleFS
MakeItEzzz555MakeItEzzz555/Gridline/skills/handover-fm-postoccupancy/SKILL.md

handover-fm-postoccupancy

Skill39 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub

Coordinate architectural handover, closeout, asset information, O&M manuals, warranties, training, commissioning records, defects, BIM/COBie-style asset data, facilities-management handoff and post-occupancy evaluation. Use from practical completion through building operation.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Keep verified facts, project assumptions, design options, and unresolved questions visibly separate.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not certify commissioning or practical completion outside the user's contractual authority.

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    If the native application is unavailable, produce a reproducible plan, script, structured data, SVG/DXF artifact, or exact in-application …

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Handover, FM & Post-Occupancy

Turn project information into an auditable owner/FM handover and feedback loop.

Preflight

  • Contract closeout requirements, asset information requirements, commissioning plan, O&M/warranty inputs, as-built models/drawings and FM system requirements.
  • Outstanding defects, training requirements, seasonal commissioning and post-occupancy goals.

Keep verified facts, project assumptions, design options, and unresolved questions visibly separate. If a required input is absent, record it as UNKNOWN rather than inventing it.

Workflow

  1. Build a closeout deliverable matrix with owner, format, responsible party and acceptance status.
  2. Reconcile as-built drawings/models, asset tags, spaces/equipment, manuals, warranties and commissioning evidence.
  3. Track defects/punch closure and unresolved operational risks; do not mark complete from paperwork alone when physical verification is required.
  4. Plan user/FM training, seasonal review and post-occupancy evaluation; feed lessons back into project standards.

Deliverables

  • Handover/closeout matrix
  • Asset-information QA report
  • Defect/commissioning status
  • FM training and post-occupancy plan

Verification

  • Asset IDs, locations and documents cross-reference correctly and required files open in their target systems.
  • As-built status is based on verified records, not design intent alone.

For file/model changes, compare the result against a pre-change baseline and report changed items, skipped items, failures, and checks actually run.

Professional boundaries

  • Do not certify commissioning or practical completion outside the user's contractual authority.
  • Protect sensitive building/security and occupant data in handover datasets.

If a live CAD/BIM/GIS/analysis tool or MCP integration is available, inspect the current document/model and tool version before write operations. Prefer read-only inspection, dry runs, bounded samples, new output paths, and native undo/transaction mechanisms. Never claim a model or drawing was changed unless the tool confirms it.

If the native application is unavailable, produce a reproducible plan, script, structured data, SVG/DXF artifact, or exact in-application procedure instead of pretending to have operated the software.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.