content-pipeline
Skill17 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Non-interactive content-production toolkit: mine quotable moments from podcast RSS feeds and meeting notes, discover clip-worthy moments in video transcripts, repurpose long-form source into platform-native drafts (X, LinkedIn, YouTube Shorts, newsletter), and batch-score/gate those drafts before publish. Use when asked to "mine quotes from this podcast", "find clips in this video", "repurpose this into a thread / LinkedIn post / Short", "turn this transcript into posts", "extract viral moments", or "gate this batch of drafts". Runs Python scripts end to end. For interactive expert-panel scoring of a single artifact see content-ops.
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Kianzzz/Zhouxing-skill-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- claude-world/claude-world-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 22, 2026
- Aravind7262/content-pipelinetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- runxhq/runxtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- pobsteta/aigoratheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- JingHao-Leon/fde-case-labtheir own version, first seen Sep 13, 2026
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- OrangeViolin/content-pipeline★ 217same name
- fivetaku/content-pipeline★ 100same name
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- claude-world/claude-world-studio★ 71same name
- coopersimson96/ai-content-system★ 17same name
- zad111ak-ai/hermes-agent-skills★ 7same name
- Kianzzz/Zhouxing-skill-public★ 4same name
- PingPingE/ai-content-agents★ 2same name
- rami-maalouf/skills★ 2same name
- ahnchen1983/agentic-substrate★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adversarial-claims-reviewerSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- codebase-cost-estimatorSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- content-opsSkill
- conversion-opsSkill
- data-model-documentationSkill
- data-model-verificationSkill
- deployment-pipelinesSkill
- findings-ledgerSkill
- game-balancerSkill
- game-systems-designerSkill
- godot-engineerSkill
- growth-engineSkill
- iap-managerSkill
- library-investigatorSkill
- marketing-shaperSkill
- memory-extractionSkill
- outbound-engineSkill
- phaser-engineerSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- prompt-shaperSkill
- release-managerSkill
- revenue-intelligenceSkill
- rust-engineerSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- securitySkill
- seo-opsSkill
- session-stateSkill
- skill-library-reviewSkill
- telemetrySkill
- typescript-analyticsSkill
- typescript-data-engineeringSkill
- typescript-testing-backendSkill
- typescript-testing-frontendSkill
- web3-smart-contract-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 37
All scripts read/write a data directory (default ./data/, override with CONTENT_OPS_DATA_DIR).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Pipeline
Script-driven content production: ingest raw source, repurpose it into platform-native drafts, and gate the drafts before publish. All steps are non-interactive Python; chain them or run any stage standalone.
quote-mining ─┐
├─► content atoms ─► content-transform ─► drafts ─► quality-scorer ─► quality-gate ─► publish
editorial-brain ┘ │
(optional in-loop expert panel from content-ops)Setup
pip install -r requirements.txt # anthropic, feedparser
cp .env.example .env # set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY; configure optional feeds/voiceAll scripts read/write a data directory (default ./data/, override with CONTENT_OPS_DATA_DIR). Each stage writes a *-latest.json the next stage picks up.
Stages
- Ingest — quote mining. Scan podcast RSS feeds + local meeting notes for quotable, contrarian, viral-worthy moments; emit scored candidates.
Feeds come frompython scripts/quote-mining-engine.py --days 90 --top 50 --min-score 60 \ --feeds config/feeds.json --notes-dir ./notes/ --speaker "Name"--feeds <json>,QUOTE_MINING_FEEDS_FILE, or inlineQUOTE_MINING_FEEDS. Seeconfig/feeds.example.json. - Ingest — editorial brain. Two-pass LLM clip discovery on a video transcript: pass 1 finds candidate hook→build→payoff moments, pass 2 deep-scores each on hook/build/payoff/clean-cut (0–100). Only clips at/above
--min-score(default 90) are cut. NeedsANTHROPIC_API_KEY; video cutting needsyt-dlp+ffmpeg(seerequirements.txt).python scripts/editorial-brain.py --url "https://youtube.com/watch?v=..." --max-clips 5 python scripts/editorial-brain.py --vtt file.vtt --video-id ID --skip-cut # analysis only - Transform. Repurpose long-form "content atoms" into platform-native drafts — X threads/posts, LinkedIn posts, YouTube Short scripts, newsletter sections. LLM mode is default;
--template-onlyruns without the API. The optional in-loop expert panel (--no-expert-panelto disable) reusescontent-ops'sexperts/andscoring-rubrics/content-quality.md— see Cross-skill dependency below.python scripts/content-transform.py --atoms atoms.json --top-n 10 python scripts/content-transform.py --atoms atoms.json --template-only - Score (batch, heuristic). Score a batch of drafts on five dimensions — voice similarity, specificity, AI-slop penalty, length appropriateness, engagement potential — and emit pass/fail per draft. No LLM; purely heuristic and fast. Default threshold 60; tune weights via
--init-weightsthen editdata/quality-scorer-weights.json.python scripts/content-quality-scorer.py --input drafts.json --verbose python scripts/content-quality-scorer.py --threshold 75 --input drafts.json - Gate (publish filter). CI-style gate that runs the scorer and filters drafts below threshold; nothing publishes without passing.
--conservativepasses everything but annotates quality flags instead of dropping.python scripts/content-quality-gate.py --input drafts.json --threshold 75
Input formats
Content atoms (transform input):
{ "atoms": [ { "id": "atom-001", "content": "Long-form source…", "tags": ["AI"], "platforms_missing": ["x","linkedin"], "repurpose_score": 8 } ] }Drafts (scorer/gate input):
{ "drafts": [ { "id": "draft-001", "platform": "x", "draft": "Content text…" } ] }Cross-skill dependency
content-transform.py's optional in-loop expert panel does not duplicate the rubric — it reads the sibling content-ops skill's experts/ panels and scoring-rubrics/content-quality.md. The path resolves to ../content-ops/ by default; override with CONTENT_OPS_SKILL_DIR if the skills live elsewhere. content-ops remains the single source of truth for panel definitions.
Related skills
- content-ops — interactive expert-panel scorer; the canonical quality gate for a single artifact, and the source of the panels this pipeline reuses in
content-transform - autoresearch — pre-launch variant generation + multi-round optimization for conversion copy
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

