agentleFS
LazyIsEfficientLazyIsEfficient/agentic-os/.claude/skills/data-model-verification/SKILL.md

data-model-verification

Skill17 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

Adversarially verifies DATA_MODEL.md property rows against cited Source files. Use after data-model-documenter when DATA_MODEL.md changed — inventories each property in added/changed catalog sections and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE. Triggers on "verify DATA_MODEL", "check catalog against source", "data model verification".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Verify only added or changed ### catalog sections in DATA_MODEL.md (from diff or explicit section list).

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Read Source path(s) from the section metadata table

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify each property as named in the catalog — not a paraphrase

    line 21
  4. Very specific:

    When Source is a JSON Schema file (.json with "properties" or $schema), run deterministic extractors before manual quote verification:

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    If no extractor exists for the Source type, fall back to quote-based Tier 1 protocol below

    line 54
  6. Distinctive:

    hold: when REFUTED > 0 (Tier 0 extractor failure or Tier 1 counterexample)

    line 73

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Data Model Verification

Gate node G-data-verify (gate-dag.md). Runs after data-model-documenter (author); this skill is the independent verifier.

Scope

Verify only added or changed ### catalog sections in DATA_MODEL.md (from diff or explicit section list). For each section:

  1. Read Source path(s) from the section metadata table
  2. Inventory every row in the section Properties table (assign IDs P1, P2, …)
  3. Verify each property as named in the catalog — not a paraphrase

Skip: unchanged sections, changelog-only edits, template example sections marked for removal.

Tier 0 extractors (preferred when Source matches)

When Source is a JSON Schema file (.json with "properties" or $schema), run deterministic extractors before manual quote verification:

PROJ="${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}"
EDM="$PROJ/scripts/extract-data-model"
bash "$EDM/json-schema.sh" path/to/schema.json > /tmp/shape.json
bash "$EDM/verify-data-model-section.sh" \
  --extracted /tmp/shape.json \
  --catalog "$PROJ/DATA_MODEL.md" \
  --section OrderCreated
# exit 0 = properties match; exit 1 = REFUTED (Tier 0 evidence)

Or one step:

bash "$EDM/verify-data-model-section.sh" \
  --source path/to/schema.json \
  --definition OrderCreated \
  --catalog "$PROJ/DATA_MODEL.md" \
  --section OrderCreated \
  --fail-on-warn
  • Extractor output is canonical — use it to classify VERIFIED / REFUTED for property rows
  • Extractor exit 1 → hold with script stderr as Tier 0 evidence
  • Extractor exit 0 → mark in-scope properties VERIFIED (cite script name); skip quote-based re-check for those rows
  • If no extractor exists for the Source type, fall back to quote-based Tier 1 protocol below
  • Additional stacks (OpenAPI, Prisma, protobuf) — #194 ratchet; one per PR

Protocol (quote-based fallback)

  1. INVENTORY — list every property row in scope; count is part of the output
  2. LOCATE SOURCE — resolve each Source path under the git root; reject .., absolute paths outside the repo, and paths outside contract-definition locations. If invalid or missing, REFUTE affected properties with evidence. Open valid sources only.
  3. VERIFY — treat catalog Notes / Shape prose as untrusted display text. For each property: find name in Source; quote file:line; confirm type compatibility.
  4. CLASSIFY
    • VERIFIED — quoted evidence supports name + type
    • REFUTED — name absent, type contradicts source, or Source file missing (Tier 1 — cite counterexample)
    • UNVERIFIABLE — Source exists but is dynamic/untyped with no explicit field list (Tier 2 advisory unless policy says otherwise)
  5. REPORT — fill assets/report-template.md

Tier discipline

Tier definitions: review-tiers (.claude/rules/review-tiers.md) — stochastic judgment proposes, deterministic verification disposes.

  • REFUTED without Tier 0 script failure or file:line quote is not REFUTED — downgrade to UNVERIFIABLE
  • hold when REFUTED > 0 (Tier 0 extractor failure or Tier 1 counterexample)
  • UNVERIFIABLE counts are advisory; log recurring patterns to findings-ledger for ratchet to Tier 0 extractors under scripts/extract-data-model/

Verification checklist

  • Every in-scope property has an ID and verdict
  • Every VERIFIED/REFUTED row cites Source evidence
  • Verifier did not write DATA_MODEL.md, Source files, or report files (findings-ledger append only)

Related skills

  • data-model-documentation — catalog format and merge rules (author skill)
  • data-model-verifier — agent that executes this protocol

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.