semantic-review
Skill220 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
需求语义核验的方法入口；需在使用者自己的环境手动接入，不自动注册或执行。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Tarektouati/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Tarektouati/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- capability-evaluationSkill
- code-implementationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- conclusion-challengeSkill
- delivery-planningSkill
- docker-build-isolationSkill
- document-maintenanceSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-collectionSkill
- evidence-diagnosisSkill
- java-build-isolationSkill
- java-spring-checkSkill
- module-planningSkill
- principle-reviewSkill
- requirement-clarificationSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- task-executionSkill
- technical-design-reviewSkill
- technical-designSkill
- verificationSkill
- workspace-isolationSkill
The file
Files
目的：将确认契约与实际入口、实现和测试对照，返回语义覆盖与反例。
适用于：已有确认契约与冻结实现的语义审查；缺少运行事实时保留缺证。
需求语义核验
适用条件与输入
当前任务命中本能力、来源与范围已明确时采用。输入：确认契约、实现范围、调用链和测试证据。
方法来源
- 需求到实现的语义核验
- 冻结输入、发现与定向复核
步骤
分别追需求到实现、实现到需求以及边界反例；未知业务语义回需求负责人。只核已给范围，必要时提出最小补证。核实工具、参数及允许动作；规范中的例子不是当前执行授权。已有有效输入复用，不要求重复填表。
输出与职责
输出：需求映射、反例及缺证。语义审查者对结果意义和实际覆盖负责；Skill 不控制上层循环或自行委派角色。
验收
输出满足所选规范，携带候选身份、证据和未覆盖项，下一接收者可复核。明确标识作者自查或独立上下文审查。
异常与停止
沿所选规范保留失败、未知和恢复条件。缺能力如实列接入缺口，不伪造命令或历史结果；权限不足只停相交动作，不绕过限制。
返回：Skills。
完整角色案例：输入到交接。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.