module-planning
Skill220 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
将当前设计分解成需求覆盖、独立写集、共享写者与无环依赖的模块包;只做规划,不启动实施。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecturetheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture★ 8same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- capability-evaluationSkill
- code-implementationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- conclusion-challengeSkill
- delivery-planningSkill
- docker-build-isolationSkill
- document-maintenanceSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-collectionSkill
- evidence-diagnosisSkill
- java-build-isolationSkill
- java-spring-checkSkill
- principle-reviewSkill
- requirement-clarificationSkill
- semantic-reviewSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- task-executionSkill
- technical-design-reviewSkill
- technical-designSkill
- verificationSkill
- workspace-isolationSkill
The file
Files
目的:将设计边界适配成单一机器模块计划与可读交接。
适用于:设计/有效需求、仓库基线和规划范围已明确的模块拆解。
模块实施规划
输入与方法来源
接收责任 Agent 给出的当前目标、来源/候选、读写集、预算、验收及恢复点。方法单源:
- design-inputs
- module-planning
适配步骤
- 消费输入与模块原子,核有效需求、设计身份、实际仓库/基线和不可拆边界;未获实施许可仍可生成标明用途的准备规划。
- 从结构模板实例化模块;逐项分配主责、写集和验收,共享文件留唯一写者,消费者只经依赖使用。
- 经规划检查工具比较独立交入的设计合同与模块计划,检查覆盖、候选身份、基线声明、一致性边界、写冲突及依赖环。设计合同必须由责任人核来源,不能从被审计划反推并自证。
- 工具返回 STRUCTURE_VALID 只说明声明结构一致;角色另核事实、设计成熟度与当前许可,输出准备/阻塞/可交接的实际结论。
- 设计或基线变化局部刷新并保旧修订;人读说明从同一 JSON 生成或核对,不维护第二份权威计划。
输出与边界
返回当前候选、方法覆盖、来源/假设、实际检查与未验、阻塞及下一责任。文档保存沿现有文档维护职责;Skill 不自行选择或启动上层流程。角色负责结论、授权和交接,工具不签语义或业务通过。
返回:Skills。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

