code-implementation
Skill220 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
将已确认需求适配为最小代码候选、行为保留映射与可复核证据;用于功能开发、修复或受控重构,不自动发布。
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- letern1ty/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- PiloTracer/pilo.ai.logicbisontheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- jgeorgeai11/claude_code_resourcestheir own version, first seen Sep 1, 2026
- myatminlu/vector-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- myatminlu/vector-skills★ 18same name
- jgeorgeai11/claude_code_resources★ 1same name
- letern1ty/claude-skills★ 0same name
- PiloTracer/pilo.ai.logicbison★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- capability-evaluationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- conclusion-challengeSkill
- delivery-planningSkill
- docker-build-isolationSkill
- document-maintenanceSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-collectionSkill
- evidence-diagnosisSkill
- java-build-isolationSkill
- java-spring-checkSkill
- module-planningSkill
- principle-reviewSkill
- requirement-clarificationSkill
- semantic-reviewSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- task-executionSkill
- technical-design-reviewSkill
- technical-designSkill
- verificationSkill
- workspace-isolationSkill
The file
Files
目的:把已确认需求落实为最小代码候选,交行为保持映射、实际验证和未决。
适用于:已确认需求与明确写集内的实现、修复或受控重构;关键契约缺失时只停依赖实现。
代码实现
适用条件与输入
适用:目标和允许写集已明确,能够定位当前代码。输入为需求/验收、当前代码与未提交差异、允许范围、工程事实及已有验证。已知信息复用;缺少关键契约只停相交实现。
方法来源
- 实现基线与最小写集
- 复用与旧行为保留
- 共享规则与一致性
- 风险驱动验证与完成声明
输入怎样变成输出
| 步骤 | 实际消费 | 输出与进入下一步的条件 |
| 固定基线 | 当前代码、工作树与允许写集交基线规范 | 文件/版本身份、既有改动和禁止动作清楚;否则先补定位 |
| 追现有行为 | 相关入口、方法、数据及副作用交行为保留规范 | 已有能力取舍、调用者和保持项有源码依据 |
| 检查重复规则 | 同语义消费者交共享规则规范 | 真有多个消费者才查共享接线;没有则给不适用依据,不造公共层 |
| 最小修改 | 已决变化与上述结果 | 在允许文件落差异,不改无关语义、类型或技术栈 |
| 作者自查 | 当前候选与验收交验证规范 | 实际用例、命令、失败/未运行和覆盖逐项对应;自查不是独立验收 |
| 交回角色 | 差异、映射及证据 | 同候选身份、限制和恢复点,交接收角色作责任判断 |
Skill 负责参数适配与真实结果,不自行扩权、委派角色或建立上层循环。命中 Java/Spring 时由角色选择专项 Skill,不用这里的伪命令代工程工具链。
输出与职责
交回实现候选、行为映射、真实验证、未验项和下一动作。实现者对目标、范围和交接负责;不把原始历史样本当本次输入,不以测试源码存在当测试成功。
验收
每项已决变化有实现落点,每项必要保持行为有接线与验证依据;完成声明只覆盖真实证据。缺运行环境时可交待验候选;不能签功能通过或需要独立上下文的审查。
异常与停止
基线变化先核失效项;写集冲突暂停相交修改。需求反转回有权决定者,失败保留可复现前置,环境不足交具体接续命令。未知副作用先查原状态,不自动重放或安装工具。
完整填写案例:书签标题规范化。返回:Skills。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

