principle-review
Skill220 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
原则审查的方法入口;需在使用者自己的环境手动接入,不自动注册或执行。
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- capability-evaluationSkill
- code-implementationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- conclusion-challengeSkill
- delivery-planningSkill
- docker-build-isolationSkill
- document-maintenanceSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-collectionSkill
- evidence-diagnosisSkill
- java-build-isolationSkill
- java-spring-checkSkill
- module-planningSkill
- requirement-clarificationSkill
- semantic-reviewSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- task-executionSkill
- technical-design-reviewSkill
- technical-designSkill
- verificationSkill
- workspace-isolationSkill
The file
Files
目的:对当前成果的目的、授权、保持项与完成声明形成有边界的原则判断。
适用于:需要原则专项判断且候选、差异、适用规则和必要证据已明确的审查。
原则审查
适用条件与输入
当前任务命中本能力、来源与范围已明确时采用。输入:任务目的、当前候选、差异、授权和必要证据。
方法来源
- 原则与证据边界
步骤
逐项核适用性和正反证;分开符合、违反、证据不足、不适用。只给与原则冲突有关的发现,不把个人风格偏好升级为原则。核实工具、参数及允许动作;规范中的例子不是当前执行授权。已有有效输入复用,不要求重复填表。
输出与职责
输出:原则判定、反例和最小补证。原则审查者对结果意义和实际覆盖负责;Skill 不控制上层循环或自行委派角色。
验收
输出满足所选规范,携带候选身份、证据和未覆盖项,下一接收者可复核。明确标识作者自查或独立上下文审查。
异常与停止
沿所选规范保留失败、未知和恢复条件。缺能力如实列接入缺口,不伪造命令或历史结果;权限不足只停相交动作,不绕过限制。
返回:Skills。
完整角色案例:输入到交接。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

