generate-comm-plan
Skill6 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates a communication plan from project charter, project plan, and stakeholder data. Includes stakeholder matrix (influence/interest), communication matrix, and escalation rules. Phase 2 artifact. In MVP stakeholders are extracted from charter; in P1 — from stakeholder-map.md. Triggers RU: «сформируй план коммуникаций», «подготовь comm-plan», «кому и как коммуницировать», «план коммуникаций», «создай план коммуникаций», «матрица стейкхолдеров», «generate-comm-plan», «коммуникационный план». Triggers EN: 'generate comm plan', 'create communication plan', 'build comm plan', 'stakeholder communication plan', 'comm plan'.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- coordinate-executorsSkill
- coordinate-meetingSkill
- generate-approval-letterSkill
- generate-budgetSkill
- generate-change-impactSkill
- generate-charterSkill
- generate-checklistSkill
- generate-closure-reportSkill
- generate-comparison-tableSkill
- generate-estimateSkill
- generate-meeting-protocolSkill
- generate-plan-fact-reportSkill
- generate-project-planSkill
- generate-questionnaireSkill
- generate-resource-planSkill
- generate-response-planSkill
- generate-risk-registerSkill
- generate-stakeholder-mapSkill
- monitor-progressSkill
- send-emailSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
If the request is in Russian → use templates with -ru suffix
- Distinctive: line 19
All output (headings, labels, comments, instructions) must match the detected language.
- Distinctive: line 30
If required data is missing — request it (system-prompt-draft.md §3.2):
- Distinctive: line 40
If the project plan does not yet exist — respond: "The communication plan depends on the project plan.
- Distinctive: line 46
Validate inputs: Check for charter + project plan.
- Distinctive: line 69
Do not include system file paths.
- Distinctive: line 174
Before showing result to user — verify:
- Very specific: line 200
After plan approval, the user must upload comm-plan.md to project knowledge.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
generate-comm-plan
Triggers
Russian: «сформируй план коммуникаций», «подготовь comm-plan», «кому и как коммуницировать» English: "generate comm plan", "create communication plan", "build comm plan"
Language Detection
Determine the language of the user's request:
- If the request is in Russian → use templates with
-rusuffix - Otherwise → use templates with
-ensuffix
All output (headings, labels, comments, instructions) must match the detected language.
1. Inputs
| Data | Required | Source | Notes |
| Project charter | yes | knowledge or chat | Source of stakeholders (section 5 "Team and Roles"), goals, scope, constraints |
| Project plan | yes | knowledge or chat | Source of milestones, phases, work blocks — for binding communications to events |
| Stakeholder data | no | chat or knowledge | Additional stakeholders not listed in the charter. In P1 — stakeholder-map.md |
| Channel preferences | no | chat | Communication channels used by the team (Slack, Teams, Email, Meets, etc.) |
If required data is missing — request it (system-prompt-draft.md §3.2):
To generate the communication plan, the following are needed:
— Project charter (project-charter.md) — source of team, goals, constraints
— Project plan (project-plan.md) — source of milestones and phases
Available: [list what is present].
Missing: [be specific].If the project plan does not yet exist — respond: "The communication plan depends on the project plan. Recommend running generate-project-plan first."
2. Execution Algorithm
- Validate inputs. Check for charter + project plan. If missing → request using the template from §1. Do NOT generate a placeholder plan — respond ONLY with the data request.
- Extract stakeholders from charter. From section 5 "Team and Roles" + section 1 "Goal" (client, sponsor). Add from project context: external stakeholders (customers, contractors, legal, finance) if mentioned in constraints, risks, or scope.
- Build preliminary stakeholder list. For each: role, influence rating (H/M/L), interest rating (H/M/L), strategy (per matrix in §3). Mark ratings as agent assumptions.
- Show preliminary list to user. Format:
Preliminary stakeholder list (extracted from charter):
| ID | Role | Name | Influence | Interest | Strategy |
[table]
Assumption: influence/interest ratings assigned by agent based on role and context.
Supplement or correct the list — after confirmation I will generate the full plan.- Wait for confirmation or corrections. Corrections → update list. Confirmation → step 6.
- Read template
comm-plan.mdfrom project knowledge. - Build communication matrix. Mandatory minimum (§3 section 2). Additional entries — based on project context (milestones, external stakeholders, specifics).
- Build escalation rules. Based on risks from charter and project constraints. Minimum 3 rules.
- Fill template sections per rules in section 3.
- Validate result against checklist (section 5).
- Show result in chat. Format (system-prompt-draft.md §3.4):
- What was done: "Communication plan generated based on [list sources]."
- Assumptions: list all.
- Required action: "Approve, provide feedback, or reject."
- Do not include system file paths. Use filename only: "Plan saved as comm-plan.md."
- Wait for user response (system-prompt-draft.md §3.5).
- Approval → generate final version.
- Feedback → revise and show updated version. After 3rd iteration — ask: "Continue revising or lock current version?"
- After approval:
- Propose text for the user to insert into log.md and project-state.md (system-prompt-draft.md §11).
- Notify: "Communication plan approved. All Phase 2 artifacts are complete (project plan, risk register, communication plan)." (or specify which are still missing).
3. Section Filling Rules
Section 1. Stakeholders
- Source: confirmed list from algorithm step 5.
- ID:
S01,S02, ... — sequential numbering. - Required roles: Sponsor, Client (internal), PM. Others — per context.
Influence/Interest matrix → strategy:
| Influence \ Interest | High | Medium | Low |
| High | Manage actively | Manage actively | Keep satisfied |
| Medium | Keep informed | Keep informed | Monitor |
| Low | Keep informed | Monitor | Monitor |
Rating scale:
| Level | Influence (description) | Interest (description) |
| H (High) | Makes key decisions, controls budget, can block the project | Actively participates, invested in outcomes, regularly requests status |
| M (Medium) | Influences specific areas (technical decisions, resources), does not block | Interested in certain aspects, periodically involved |
| L (Low) | Does not influence project decisions, executes tasks | Minimal interest, engaged on request |
Section 2. Communication Matrix
- ID:
C01,C02, ... — sequential numbering. - Audience: references to stakeholder IDs from section 1.
Mandatory minimum communications:
| Type | Audience | Default Frequency |
| Sponsor status report | Sponsor (+ Client) | Weekly |
| Sprint/iteration planning | Team | On event (sprint start) |
| Sprint demo/review | Sponsor, Client, Tech Lead | On event (sprint end) |
| Escalation (critical issues) | Sponsor | On event |
Additional communications — per context: client sync, external stakeholder alignment, financial report, customer updates.
Reference values:
| Column | Allowed values |
| Format | Meeting, Report, Notification, Presentation, Letter |
| Channel | Email, Meeting (online), Meeting (offline), Chat, Meeting (online/offline) |
| Frequency | Daily, Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, On event, On demand, One-time |
| Artifact | Filename from the system: weekly-status.md, meeting-protocol-{date}.md, progress-report-{date}.md, deviation-report-{date}.md or — if no artifact is produced |
Section 3. Escalation Rules
- Minimum 3 escalation rules.
- Required situation types: schedule deviation, budget overrun, blocking issue.
- Additional — per context (incident, stakeholder refusal, legal issue).
- Thresholds: determine based on project scale. If not specified — formulate as assumption.
- Channel: for critical situations — multiple channels (Email + Meeting or Chat + Email).
- Response time: tie to severity (blocking — hours, deviation — days).
Header Metadata
Version: 1.0Date: current generation date.File:comm-plan.mdDocument status:draft(at generation). After approval —approved.Source: list the files used as input.
4. Placeholder Table
Placeholders
{{}}in the template are fill-in guides, not auto-substitution variables. Replace each with the corresponding value from the input data.
| Placeholder | Required | Source | Allowed values |
{{project_name}} | yes | charter | text |
{{version}} | yes | agent | 1.0 on creation |
{{date}} | yes | system | YYYY-MM-DD |
{{source_docs}} | yes | agent | list of source files |
{{role}} | yes (≥3) | charter / user data | functional role |
{{name}} | yes (≥3) | charter / user data | name / position |
{{strategy}} | yes (≥3) | agent (per matrix §3) | Manage actively, Keep informed, Keep satisfied, Monitor |
{{comm_name}} | yes (≥4) | agent | communication name |
{{format}} | yes | agent | see reference §3 section 2 |
{{channel}} | yes | agent / user data | see reference §3 section 2 |
{{frequency}} | yes | agent | see reference §3 section 2 |
{{owner}} | yes | charter / user data | name of responsible person |
{{artifact}} | no | agent | system filename or — |
{{threshold}} | yes (≥3) | project data / assumption | numeric threshold + unit |
{{stakeholder_id}} | yes (≥3) | section 1 | S01, S02, ... |
{{deadline}} | yes (≥3) | agent | response time (hours/days) |
5. Validation Checklist
Before showing result to user — verify:
- All required placeholders replaced with values
- No
{{}}placeholders remaining in text - Stakeholders: ≥3 (Sponsor, Client, PM), each with H/M/L rating and strategy
- Strategy matches the influence/interest matrix (§3 section 1)
- Communication matrix: ≥4 entries (mandatory minimum), each with audience (ID), format, channel, frequency
- Artifacts in matrix — real system filenames (not arbitrary labels)
- Escalation rules: ≥3, with thresholds, channels, and response time
- Escalation thresholds appropriate for project scale
- All agent assumptions listed when delivering result
- Document status =
draft - Header metadata filled in
6. Dependencies
Consumes (input):
project-charter.md— project charter (skill generate-charter)project-plan.md— project plan (skill generate-project-plan)- In P1:
stakeholder-map.md— stakeholder map (skill generate-stakeholder-map)
Produces (output): communication plan → consumed by (system-prompt-draft.md §7):
send-email(module) — defines recipients and mailing frequency (P1)
After plan approval, the user must upload comm-plan.md to project knowledge.
7. Usage Example
User command:
Сформируй план коммуникаций. Устав и план проекта — в knowledge.
Agent response (step 4 — preliminary list):
Stakeholders extracted from charter:
ID Role Name Influence Interest Strategy S01 Sponsor Алексей Воронов, CEO H H Manage actively S02 Client Елена Морозова, Head of CS H H Manage actively S03 PM Кирилл Ругалёв M H Keep informed Assumption: influence/interest ratings assigned based on roles. Supplement the list or correct the ratings.
After approval (step 11):
Communication plan "ClientBoard" generated based on: project-charter.md, project-plan.md.
Assumptions:
- Stakeholder influence/interest ratings assigned by agent based on roles.
- Budget escalation threshold: >10% of total (not specified in charter).
- Communication channels: Email + online meetings (preferences not specified).
Required: approve, provide feedback, or reject.
[plan text]
Change Log
| Date | Version | Change |
| 2026-03-26 | 1.0 | Skill created. Hybrid stakeholder model (extraction + clarification). Mandatory minimum of 4 communications. Reference values dictionary. Table of 16 placeholders |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

