agentleFS
KirKruglovKirKruglov/claude-project-manager/skills/generate-comm-plan/SKILL.md

generate-comm-plan

Skill6 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generates a communication plan from project charter, project plan, and stakeholder data. Includes stakeholder matrix (influence/interest), communication matrix, and escalation rules. Phase 2 artifact. In MVP stakeholders are extracted from charter; in P1 — from stakeholder-map.md. Triggers RU: «сформируй план коммуникаций», «подготовь comm-plan», «кому и как коммуницировать», «план коммуникаций», «создай план коммуникаций», «матрица стейкхолдеров», «generate-comm-plan», «коммуникационный план». Triggers EN: 'generate comm plan', 'create communication plan', 'build comm plan', 'stakeholder communication plan', 'comm plan'.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the request is in Russian → use templates with -ru suffix

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    All output (headings, labels, comments, instructions) must match the detected language.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    If required data is missing — request it (system-prompt-draft.md §3.2):

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    If the project plan does not yet exist — respond: "The communication plan depends on the project plan.

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Validate inputs: Check for charter + project plan.

    line 46
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not include system file paths.

    line 69
  7. Distinctive:

    Before showing result to user — verify:

    line 174
  8. Very specific:

    After plan approval, the user must upload comm-plan.md to project knowledge.

    line 200

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

generate-comm-plan

Triggers

Russian: «сформируй план коммуникаций», «подготовь comm-plan», «кому и как коммуницировать» English: "generate comm plan", "create communication plan", "build comm plan"

Language Detection

Determine the language of the user's request:

  • If the request is in Russian → use templates with -ru suffix
  • Otherwise → use templates with -en suffix

All output (headings, labels, comments, instructions) must match the detected language.

1. Inputs

DataRequiredSourceNotes
Project charteryesknowledge or chatSource of stakeholders (section 5 "Team and Roles"), goals, scope, constraints
Project planyesknowledge or chatSource of milestones, phases, work blocks — for binding communications to events
Stakeholder datanochat or knowledgeAdditional stakeholders not listed in the charter. In P1 — stakeholder-map.md
Channel preferencesnochatCommunication channels used by the team (Slack, Teams, Email, Meets, etc.)

If required data is missing — request it (system-prompt-draft.md §3.2):

To generate the communication plan, the following are needed:
— Project charter (project-charter.md) — source of team, goals, constraints
— Project plan (project-plan.md) — source of milestones and phases
Available: [list what is present].
Missing: [be specific].

If the project plan does not yet exist — respond: "The communication plan depends on the project plan. Recommend running generate-project-plan first."


2. Execution Algorithm

  1. Validate inputs. Check for charter + project plan. If missing → request using the template from §1. Do NOT generate a placeholder plan — respond ONLY with the data request.
  2. Extract stakeholders from charter. From section 5 "Team and Roles" + section 1 "Goal" (client, sponsor). Add from project context: external stakeholders (customers, contractors, legal, finance) if mentioned in constraints, risks, or scope.
  3. Build preliminary stakeholder list. For each: role, influence rating (H/M/L), interest rating (H/M/L), strategy (per matrix in §3). Mark ratings as agent assumptions.
  4. Show preliminary list to user. Format:
Preliminary stakeholder list (extracted from charter):
| ID | Role | Name | Influence | Interest | Strategy |
[table]
Assumption: influence/interest ratings assigned by agent based on role and context.
Supplement or correct the list — after confirmation I will generate the full plan.
  1. Wait for confirmation or corrections. Corrections → update list. Confirmation → step 6.
  2. Read template comm-plan.md from project knowledge.
  3. Build communication matrix. Mandatory minimum (§3 section 2). Additional entries — based on project context (milestones, external stakeholders, specifics).
  4. Build escalation rules. Based on risks from charter and project constraints. Minimum 3 rules.
  5. Fill template sections per rules in section 3.
  6. Validate result against checklist (section 5).
  7. Show result in chat. Format (system-prompt-draft.md §3.4):
    • What was done: "Communication plan generated based on [list sources]."
    • Assumptions: list all.
    • Required action: "Approve, provide feedback, or reject."
    • Do not include system file paths. Use filename only: "Plan saved as comm-plan.md."
  8. Wait for user response (system-prompt-draft.md §3.5).
    • Approval → generate final version.
    • Feedback → revise and show updated version. After 3rd iteration — ask: "Continue revising or lock current version?"
  9. After approval:
    • Propose text for the user to insert into log.md and project-state.md (system-prompt-draft.md §11).
    • Notify: "Communication plan approved. All Phase 2 artifacts are complete (project plan, risk register, communication plan)." (or specify which are still missing).

3. Section Filling Rules

Section 1. Stakeholders

  • Source: confirmed list from algorithm step 5.
  • ID: S01, S02, ... — sequential numbering.
  • Required roles: Sponsor, Client (internal), PM. Others — per context.

Influence/Interest matrix → strategy:

Influence \ InterestHighMediumLow
HighManage activelyManage activelyKeep satisfied
MediumKeep informedKeep informedMonitor
LowKeep informedMonitorMonitor

Rating scale:

LevelInfluence (description)Interest (description)
H (High)Makes key decisions, controls budget, can block the projectActively participates, invested in outcomes, regularly requests status
M (Medium)Influences specific areas (technical decisions, resources), does not blockInterested in certain aspects, periodically involved
L (Low)Does not influence project decisions, executes tasksMinimal interest, engaged on request

Section 2. Communication Matrix

  • ID: C01, C02, ... — sequential numbering.
  • Audience: references to stakeholder IDs from section 1.

Mandatory minimum communications:

TypeAudienceDefault Frequency
Sponsor status reportSponsor (+ Client)Weekly
Sprint/iteration planningTeamOn event (sprint start)
Sprint demo/reviewSponsor, Client, Tech LeadOn event (sprint end)
Escalation (critical issues)SponsorOn event

Additional communications — per context: client sync, external stakeholder alignment, financial report, customer updates.

Reference values:

ColumnAllowed values
FormatMeeting, Report, Notification, Presentation, Letter
ChannelEmail, Meeting (online), Meeting (offline), Chat, Meeting (online/offline)
FrequencyDaily, Weekly, Bi-weekly, Monthly, On event, On demand, One-time
ArtifactFilename from the system: weekly-status.md, meeting-protocol-{date}.md, progress-report-{date}.md, deviation-report-{date}.md or — if no artifact is produced

Section 3. Escalation Rules

  • Minimum 3 escalation rules.
  • Required situation types: schedule deviation, budget overrun, blocking issue.
  • Additional — per context (incident, stakeholder refusal, legal issue).
  • Thresholds: determine based on project scale. If not specified — formulate as assumption.
  • Channel: for critical situations — multiple channels (Email + Meeting or Chat + Email).
  • Response time: tie to severity (blocking — hours, deviation — days).

Header Metadata

  • Version: 1.0
  • Date: current generation date.
  • File: comm-plan.md
  • Document status: draft (at generation). After approval — approved.
  • Source: list the files used as input.

4. Placeholder Table

Placeholders {{}} in the template are fill-in guides, not auto-substitution variables. Replace each with the corresponding value from the input data.

PlaceholderRequiredSourceAllowed values
{{project_name}}yeschartertext
{{version}}yesagent1.0 on creation
{{date}}yessystemYYYY-MM-DD
{{source_docs}}yesagentlist of source files
{{role}}yes (≥3)charter / user datafunctional role
{{name}}yes (≥3)charter / user dataname / position
{{strategy}}yes (≥3)agent (per matrix §3)Manage actively, Keep informed, Keep satisfied, Monitor
{{comm_name}}yes (≥4)agentcommunication name
{{format}}yesagentsee reference §3 section 2
{{channel}}yesagent / user datasee reference §3 section 2
{{frequency}}yesagentsee reference §3 section 2
{{owner}}yescharter / user dataname of responsible person
{{artifact}}noagentsystem filename or —
{{threshold}}yes (≥3)project data / assumptionnumeric threshold + unit
{{stakeholder_id}}yes (≥3)section 1S01, S02, ...
{{deadline}}yes (≥3)agentresponse time (hours/days)

5. Validation Checklist

Before showing result to user — verify:

  • All required placeholders replaced with values
  • No {{}} placeholders remaining in text
  • Stakeholders: ≥3 (Sponsor, Client, PM), each with H/M/L rating and strategy
  • Strategy matches the influence/interest matrix (§3 section 1)
  • Communication matrix: ≥4 entries (mandatory minimum), each with audience (ID), format, channel, frequency
  • Artifacts in matrix — real system filenames (not arbitrary labels)
  • Escalation rules: ≥3, with thresholds, channels, and response time
  • Escalation thresholds appropriate for project scale
  • All agent assumptions listed when delivering result
  • Document status = draft
  • Header metadata filled in

6. Dependencies

Consumes (input):

  • project-charter.md — project charter (skill generate-charter)
  • project-plan.md — project plan (skill generate-project-plan)
  • In P1: stakeholder-map.md — stakeholder map (skill generate-stakeholder-map)

Produces (output): communication plan → consumed by (system-prompt-draft.md §7):

  • send-email (module) — defines recipients and mailing frequency (P1)

After plan approval, the user must upload comm-plan.md to project knowledge.


7. Usage Example

User command:

Сформируй план коммуникаций. Устав и план проекта — в knowledge.

Agent response (step 4 — preliminary list):

Stakeholders extracted from charter:

IDRoleNameInfluenceInterestStrategy
S01SponsorАлексей Воронов, CEOHHManage actively
S02ClientЕлена Морозова, Head of CSHHManage actively
S03PMКирилл РугалёвMHKeep informed

Assumption: influence/interest ratings assigned based on roles. Supplement the list or correct the ratings.

After approval (step 11):

Communication plan "ClientBoard" generated based on: project-charter.md, project-plan.md.

Assumptions:

  • Stakeholder influence/interest ratings assigned by agent based on roles.
  • Budget escalation threshold: >10% of total (not specified in charter).
  • Communication channels: Email + online meetings (preferences not specified).

Required: approve, provide feedback, or reject.

[plan text]


Change Log

DateVersionChange
2026-03-261.0Skill created. Hybrid stakeholder model (extraction + clarification). Mandatory minimum of 4 communications. Reference values dictionary. Table of 16 placeholders

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.