generate-change-impact
Skill6 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates a change impact assessment file (change-impact-CR-001.xlsx) for Phase 4 — Development. PM describes a scope change request; the agent classifies the change (scope / budget / timeline / resource), analyzes impact on project-plan.md and project-budget.xlsx, calculates timeline delta, budget delta, and risk level (Low / Medium / High), then produces a two-sheet xlsx artifact with a summary and detailed breakdown. PM reviews the draft and makes the final approval decision. Covers task #21 of the project management agent. Mode B: agent prepares draft, PM decides. If approved — updates project-plan.md via generate-project-plan. Triggers EN: 'scope change request', 'change impact assessment', 'generate change impact'.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- coordinate-executorsSkill
- coordinate-meetingSkill
- generate-approval-letterSkill
- generate-budgetSkill
- generate-charterSkill
- generate-checklistSkill
- generate-closure-reportSkill
- generate-comm-planSkill
- generate-comparison-tableSkill
- generate-estimateSkill
- generate-meeting-protocolSkill
- generate-plan-fact-reportSkill
- generate-project-planSkill
- generate-questionnaireSkill
- generate-resource-planSkill
- generate-response-planSkill
- generate-risk-registerSkill
- generate-stakeholder-mapSkill
- monitor-progressSkill
- send-emailSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈18
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
If the request is in Russian → use templates with -ru suffix, respond in Russian
- Distinctive: line 55
If the request concerns general change management (methodology, processes) or does not describe a specific scope change → respond: …
- Distinctive: line 60
Do not start the workflow.
- Distinctive: line 62
If the request contains a description of a specific change → proceed to Step 2.
- Distinctive: line 76
Ask a clarifying question before proceeding to Step 3: "To calculate impact accurately, please clarify:
- Distinctive: line 80
Do not proceed to Step 3 without an answer.
- Distinctive: line 83
Ask: "Please describe the change in more detail:
- Distinctive: line 98
If the change affects multiple categories — assign a primary one, list the rest as secondary.
- Distinctive: line 104
Read project files for impact analysis:
- Distinctive: line 109
Ask PM a clarifying question: "Files project-plan.md / project-budget.xlsx not found.
- Distinctive: line 114
If this data is not available — I will generate the assessment based on the change description only." Use the answers in the Step 4 …
- Distinctive: line 115
Use the answers in the Step 4 analysis.
- Distinctive: line 134
If budget data is unavailable — mark as "to be confirmed by PM"
- Distinctive: line 165
Ask: "Is this data correct?
- Very specific: line 173
Follow the schema from templates/change-impact-{lang}.md.
- Very specific: line 175
Use the xlsx skill to create change-impact-{id}.xlsx.
- Distinctive: line 181
Add a comment if needed."
- Very specific: line 191
Update project-state.md: artifact change-impact-{id}.xlsx → "approved".
- Very specific: line 192
Write to logs/log.md: date, CR-ID, category, impact level, decision.
- Distinctive: line 193
If decision is Approved → notify PM: "Change approved.
- Distinctive: line 228
If project-plan.md and project-budget.xlsx are unavailable — analysis is based on PM data, marked "estimate — no project files"
- Distinctive: line 229
Does not modify project-plan.md directly — only recommends running generate-project-plan after approval
- Distinctive: line 230
Does not create Jira tasks — use coordinate-executors for that
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: generate-change-impact
Generates a change impact assessment for Phase 4 — Development (task #21).
PM describes the change request; the agent classifies it, analyzes impact on
timeline and budget, calculates deltas and risk level. Output: change-impact-{id}.xlsx.
Mode B: agent prepares draft, PM makes the decision.
Triggers
Russian: «запрос на изменение скоупа», «оценка изменения», «влияние изменения на проект», «изменение скоупа», «CR по проекту», «оцени изменение», «изменение требований», «корректировка скоупа» English: "scope change request", "change impact assessment", "generate change impact", "change request analysis", "evaluate scope change", "change order impact"
Language Detection
Determine the language of the user's request:
- If the request is in Russian → use templates with
-rusuffix, respond in Russian - Otherwise → use templates with
-ensuffix, respond in English
Input
| Data | Required | Source |
| Change description | yes | PM writes in chat |
| Request ID (CR-001, etc.) | no | PM provides or agent assigns next in sequence |
| Requester | no | PM provides or leave blank |
| Project plan | no | 02-planning/project-plan.md — deadlines and tasks |
| Project budget | no | 02-planning/project-budget.xlsx — budget items |
Output
| File | Project path | Format | Description |
change-impact-{id}.xlsx | 04-development/ | .xlsx | Change impact assessment |
File structure — 2 sheets (Summary, Impact Detail) — defined in templates/change-impact-{lang}.md.
Instructions
Step 1 — Validate Request
Guard-rail — check request type. If the request concerns general change management (methodology, processes) or does not describe a specific scope change → respond: "generate-change-impact assesses the impact of a specific scope change request. Describe the specific change: what needs to change, the rationale, and the expected impact. The skill will produce a structured assessment for decision-making." Do not start the workflow.
If the request contains a description of a specific change → proceed to Step 2.
Step 2 — Collect Change Request Data
Extract from chat:
- Change description — what is changing (functionality, technology, scope of work)
- Rationale — why the change is needed
- ID — if PM provided one (CR-001, CR-002, etc.)
- Requester — who initiated the change (client, team, PM, external factor)
If the change involves replacing a technology, architecture, or platform (keywords: "rewrite", "replace platform", "migrate to", "entire [component]"): Ask a clarifying question before proceeding to Step 3: "To calculate impact accurately, please clarify:
- Does the change affect the entire [component] or only part of it?
- Is the work planned in parallel with current sprint tasks or sequentially (after the current sprint)?" Do not proceed to Step 3 without an answer.
If the description is insufficient: Ask: "Please describe the change in more detail:
- What exactly is changing in scope (features, requirements, scope of work)?
- Why is this change needed?
- Are there any known deadline or budget constraints for this change?"
If no ID is provided: assign the next in sequence (find the last CR-XXX in 04-development/
or start with CR-001). Notify PM: "Request assigned ID: CR-001."
Change category classification: Based on the description, determine the category:
scope— adding or removing functionality or requirementsbudget— change in funding without altering functionalitytimeline— deadline shift without changing scope or budgetresource— replacing, adding, or removing team members
If the change affects multiple categories — assign a primary one, list the rest as secondary.
Step 3 — Read Project Data
Read project files for impact analysis:
02-planning/project-plan.md— current deadlines, tasks, milestones02-planning/project-budget.xlsx— budget items and approved amounts
If files are unavailable or not found: Ask PM a clarifying question: "Files project-plan.md / project-budget.xlsx not found. For a more accurate assessment, please provide:
- Approximate project completion date?
- Approved budget (approximate amount)?
- Dates of the nearest key milestones (if known)? If this data is not available — I will generate the assessment based on the change description only." Use the answers in the Step 4 analysis. Mark the data source in the artifact: "data provided by PM (files not loaded)" or "estimate — no project files".
Step 4 — Impact Analysis
Analyze across four dimensions. Record each value with an explicit data source (from file or agent estimate based on PM description).
4.1 Timeline Impact
- Identify affected tasks and milestones from project-plan.md
- Calculate the shift in working days for each affected task
- Determine the total shift of the final deadline (if applicable)
- Identify critical path: does the change shift the project completion date?
4.2 Budget Impact
- Identify affected budget items from project-budget.xlsx
- Estimate the delta in monetary terms (absolute and %)
- If budget data is unavailable — mark as "to be confirmed by PM"
4.3 Resource Impact
- Determine whether additional or different team members are required
- Specify roles and time volume (if applicable)
4.4 Risk Level and Overall Impact Level Determine the impact level using the matrix:
| Level | Criteria |
| Low | Shift ≤ 5 working days, budget delta ≤ 5%, does not affect critical path |
| Medium | Shift 6–15 working days OR budget delta 6–15% OR affects critical path |
| High | Shift > 15 working days OR budget delta > 15% OR changes architecture/core requirements |
Record the final level: Low / Medium / High.
Step 5 — Confirm Data with PM
Show PM a brief impact summary in chat before generating the file:
CR-001 — [change title]
Category: [scope/budget/timeline/resource]
Timeline impact: [+X working days / "no impact"]
Budget impact: [+X / ±0 / "to be confirmed"]
Impact level: [Low/Medium/High]Ask: "Is this data correct? Confirm or correct — I will generate the file."
Do not create the file until PM confirms.
Step 6 — Create xlsx and Save
Follow the schema from templates/change-impact-{lang}.md.
- Use the xlsx skill to create
change-impact-{id}.xlsx. - Save to
{project}/04-development/change-impact-{id}.xlsx. - Output in chat:
- Confirmation: "File saved: 04-development/change-impact-{id}.xlsx"
- Sheet 1 Summary as a Markdown table (key blocks only)
- Question: "Assessment ready. Your decision: Approved / Rejected / Postponed? Add a comment if needed."
- Do not make the decision for PM — this is always the human's call.
Step 7 — Record Decision
After PM responds:
- Record the decision (Approved / Rejected / Postponed + date + comment) in the
"PM Decision Block" of the file (if xlsx is edited) or save separately in
logs/log.md. - Update
project-state.md: artifactchange-impact-{id}.xlsx→ "approved". - Write to
logs/log.md: date, CR-ID, category, impact level, decision. - If decision is Approved → notify PM: "Change approved. To update the project plan, run generate-project-plan (task #7) using data from CR-{id}: [task shifts and budget delta]."
Templates
| File | Purpose |
templates/change-impact-ru.md | xlsx artifact schema (RU) |
templates/change-impact-en.md | xlsx artifact schema (EN) |
Dependencies
Reads:
- Change description from chat (required)
02-planning/project-plan.md— deadlines and tasks (optional)02-planning/project-budget.xlsx— budget items (optional)
Passes data to:
04-development/change-impact-{id}.xlsx→generate-project-plan(#7) — on change approval, to update the project plan
Calls:
xlsx skill— to create the .xlsx file
Constraints
- Mode B: assessment is a draft for PM; approval decision is always made by the human
- One CR per invocation; for multiple CRs — run the skill separately for each
- If project-plan.md and project-budget.xlsx are unavailable — analysis is based on PM data, marked "estimate — no project files"
- Does not modify project-plan.md directly — only recommends running generate-project-plan after approval
- Does not create Jira tasks — use coordinate-executors for that
- Category classification is automatic based on description; PM can correct it at Step 5
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

