generate-checklist
Skill6 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates project management checklists for Phase 5 (Launch) and Phase 6 (Closure): launch readiness checklist (launch-checklist.md), technical readiness checklist (tech-readiness-checklist.md), and handover-to-operations checklist (handover-checklist.md). Covers tasks #22, #24, and #32 of the project management agent. Mode B: agent pre-populates base items from PMBoK-aligned templates and enriches with data from project-plan.md if available; PM reviews and finalizes. Checklist type is inferred from context; if ambiguous, agent asks. Triggers EN: 'launch checklist', 'tech readiness checklist', 'handover checklist'.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- coordinate-executorsSkill
- coordinate-meetingSkill
- generate-approval-letterSkill
- generate-budgetSkill
- generate-change-impactSkill
- generate-charterSkill
- generate-closure-reportSkill
- generate-comm-planSkill
- generate-comparison-tableSkill
- generate-estimateSkill
- generate-meeting-protocolSkill
- generate-plan-fact-reportSkill
- generate-project-planSkill
- generate-questionnaireSkill
- generate-resource-planSkill
- generate-response-planSkill
- generate-risk-registerSkill
- generate-stakeholder-mapSkill
- monitor-progressSkill
- send-emailSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 55
If the request concerns checklist methodology in general, not a specific project checklist → respond: "generate-checklist creates three …
- Distinctive: line 57
Do not start the workflow.
- Distinctive: line 67
If type cannot be determined unambiguously → ask: "Which checklist do you need?
- Distinctive: line 72
Do not proceed to Step 2 without an answer.
- Very specific: line 78
Read project-state.md to obtain:
- Very specific: line 82
If 02-planning/project-plan.md is available — read and extract:
- Very specific: line 109
Enrichment rule: if project-plan.md contains specific Phase tasks, add them as additional items under the matching template section, marked …
- Distinctive: line 122
Add / remove items → describe your changes.
- Distinctive: line 123
Update owners or dates → specify."
- Distinctive: line 131
Create file per the table in the Output section.
- Very specific: line 133
Update project-state.md: add/update artifact record → status draft.
- Very specific: line 134
Write to logs/log.md: date, skill, checklist type, file path.
- Distinctive: line 180
Does not modify project-plan.md or other artifacts
- Distinctive: line 181
Does not create Jira tasks — use coordinate-executors for that
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: generate-checklist
Generates three types of project checklists for the Launch (Phase 5) and Closure (Phase 6) phases. Populates base items from PMBoK-aligned templates; enriches with project-plan.md data when available. Mode B: agent prepares a draft, PM reviews and finalizes.
Triggers
Russian: «чек-лист запуска», «чек-лист технической готовности», «чек-лист передачи», «подготовь чеклист», «проверка готовности к запуску», «список для передачи в эксплуатацию» English: "launch checklist", "tech readiness checklist", "handover checklist", "generate checklist", "readiness checklist", "deployment checklist", "closure checklist"
Language Detection
- Request in Russian → templates with
-rusuffix, responses in Russian - Otherwise → templates with
-ensuffix, responses in English
Input
| Data | Required | Source |
| Checklist type (launch / tech readiness / handover) | no | Inferred from context or PM question |
| Project name | no | project-state.md or PM in chat |
| Responsible person | no | PM specifies or left blank |
| Task and milestone data | no | 02-planning/project-plan.md — for auto-population |
| Launch / handover date | no | PM specifies or from project-plan.md |
Output
| File | Project path | Type | Task |
launch-checklist.md | 03-execution/ | Launch checklist | #22 |
tech-readiness-checklist.md | 03-execution/ | Tech readiness checklist | #24 |
handover-checklist.md | 04-closure/ | Handover checklist | #32 |
File structure is defined in the corresponding template from templates/.
Instructions
Step 1 — Determine Checklist Type
Guard-rail — verify request type. If the request concerns checklist methodology in general, not a specific project checklist → respond: "generate-checklist creates three types of project checklists: launch (#22, Phase 5), technical readiness (#24, Phase 5), and operations handover (#32, Phase 6). Specify which checklist you need or describe the context." Do not start the workflow.
Infer type from request context:
| Context / keywords | Checklist type |
| "launch", "go-live", "market release", task #22 | launch-checklist |
| "tech readiness", "deploy", "infrastructure", task #24 | tech-readiness-checklist |
| "handover", "operations", "closure", task #32 | handover-checklist |
If type cannot be determined unambiguously → ask: "Which checklist do you need?
- Launch checklist (#22) — confirming overall product/project readiness for launch.
- Technical readiness checklist (#24) — verifying technical and infrastructure readiness.
- Operations handover checklist (#32) — documenting project transfer to the support/operations team." Do not proceed to Step 2 without an answer.
Step 2 — Gather Context Data
Read project-state.md to obtain:
- Project name
- Current phase and launch date (if specified)
If 02-planning/project-plan.md is available — read and extract:
- Planned launch / handover date
- Key milestones of Phase 5 or Phase 6
- Task list and owners for the phase (for auto-populating checklist items)
- Team composition (PM, tech lead, business owner)
If files are unavailable: continue with template base items. Output to chat: "project-plan.md not found — generating checklist from PMBoK template. Add specific tasks, dates, and owners manually."
Step 3 — Build the Checklist
Load the corresponding template:
| Type | Template (RU) | Template (EN) |
| launch-checklist | templates/launch-checklist-ru.md | templates/launch-checklist-en.md |
| tech-readiness-checklist | templates/tech-readiness-checklist-ru.md | templates/tech-readiness-checklist-en.md |
| handover-checklist | templates/handover-checklist-ru.md | templates/handover-checklist-en.md |
Populate template placeholders:
- Project name, date, responsible — from project-state.md or PM's data
- Checklist items — base items from template (PMBoK Best Practice) + specifics from project-plan.md
- Owners per item — from project plan if available; otherwise
[PM]as placeholder - Due dates — from project plan if available; otherwise
[date]as placeholder
Enrichment rule: if project-plan.md contains specific Phase tasks, add them as additional items under the matching template section, marked [from plan].
Step 4 — Show Draft to PM
Output to chat:
- Brief summary: checklist type, number of sections, number of items
- First 2 sections as preview (markdown)
Ask: "Draft checklist is ready. Would you like to:
- Save as is → I will generate the file.
- Add / remove items → describe your changes.
- Update owners or dates → specify."
Do not create the file until PM confirms.
Step 5 — Create File and Save
- Create file per the table in the Output section.
- Save to the corresponding project folder.
- Update
project-state.md: add/update artifact record → statusdraft. - Write to
logs/log.md: date, skill, checklist type, file path. - Output to chat:
- "File saved: {path}"
- Next orchestration step (see table below)
Post-creation orchestration:
| Checklist type | Next step |
| launch-checklist (#22) | Run tech-readiness-checklist (#24) in parallel; after both → coordinate-executors (#23) |
| tech-readiness-checklist (#24) | Run in parallel with launch-checklist (#22); both complete → launch phase active |
| handover-checklist (#32) | After completion → generate-closure-report (#31) |
Templates
| File | Checklist type |
templates/launch-checklist-ru.md | Launch checklist (RU) |
templates/launch-checklist-en.md | Launch checklist (EN) |
templates/tech-readiness-checklist-ru.md | Tech readiness checklist (RU) |
templates/tech-readiness-checklist-en.md | Tech readiness checklist (EN) |
templates/handover-checklist-ru.md | Handover checklist (RU) |
templates/handover-checklist-en.md | Handover checklist (EN) |
Dependencies
Reads:
project-state.md— project name, phase (optional)02-planning/project-plan.md— tasks, milestones, owners (optional)
Feeds data to:
03-execution/launch-checklist.md→ coordinate-executors (#23)03-execution/tech-readiness-checklist.md→ activates launch phase04-closure/handover-checklist.md→ generate-closure-report (#31)
Constraints
- Mode B: draft for PM; PM reviews and approves
- One checklist type per invocation; for multiple types — separate skill calls
- Without project-plan.md — base template items only; placeholders for project-specific data
- Does not modify project-plan.md or other artifacts
- Does not create Jira tasks — use coordinate-executors for that
- Base items follow PMBoK 8 and Agile best practice; PM adapts to project specifics
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

