building-nango-functions
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Builds Nango Function implementation patterns for createAction() and createSync() without choosing a local CLI or remote API workflow. Use only when the user asks to create or update a Nango action or sync and it is unclear whether the work should happen in a checked-out project via CLI or through Nango remote APIs. Do not load when building-nango-functions-locally or building-nango-functions-remotely applies; those skills overlap with this content and add workflow-specific validation and deploy details.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- NangoHQ/skillsedited, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- NangoHQ/skills★ 372% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository168 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/AGENT.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-CREATOR.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/CO-STAR-PROMPT.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/README.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/CO-STAR-UI-CREATOR/ui.mdCursor rule
- 401-403-bypass-techniquesSkill
- active-directory-acl-abuseSkill
- active-directory-certificate-servicesSkill
- active-directory-kerberos-attacksSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-ml-securitySkill
- ai-seoSkill
- android-pentesting-tricksSkill
- anti-debugging-techniquesSkill
- api-auth-and-jwt-abuseSkill
- api-authorization-and-bolaSkill
- api-recon-and-docsSkill
- api-secSkill
- arbitrary-write-to-rceSkill
- arize-adminSkill
- arize-ai-provider-integrationSkill
- arize-annotationSkill
- arize-compliance-auditSkill
- arize-datasetSkill
- arize-evaluatorSkill
- arize-experimentSkill
- arize-instrumentationSkill
- arize-linkSkill
- arize-prompt-optimizationSkill
- arize-promptsSkill
- arize-traceSkill
- authbypass-authentication-flawsSkill
- auth-secSkill
- binary-protection-bypassSkill
- browser-exploitation-v8Skill
- building-nango-functions-locallySkill
- building-nango-functions-remotelySkill
- business-logic-vulnerabilitiesSkill
- business-logic-vulnSkill
- classical-cipher-analysisSkill
- clickjackingSkill
- cmdi-command-injectionSkill
- code-obfuscation-deobfuscationSkill
- compliance-checkSkill
- compliance-trackingSkill
- container-escape-techniquesSkill
- core-engineeringSkill
- cors-cross-origin-misconfigurationSkill
- crlf-injectionSkill
- csp-bypass-advancedSkill
- csrf-cross-site-request-forgerySkill
- csv-formula-injectionSkill
- d3-visualizationSkill
- dangling-markup-injectionSkill
- defi-attack-patternsSkill
- dependency-confusionSkill
- deserialization-insecureSkill
- dns-rebinding-attacksSkill
- documentation-writerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
29 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 18 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
18
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
If the task becomes clearly local/CLI-based, use building-nango-functions-locally instead.
- Distinctive: line 17
Use the active workflow skill for compile, dryrun, test, and deploy mechanics
- Very specific: line 21
If the task is a sync, read references/syncs.md before writing code and state one of these paths first:
- Very specific: line 45
Read references/actions.md before writing code
- Very specific: line 65
Test input JSON if the active workflow will validate or dryrun the action (use {} for no-input actions)
- Distinctive: line 72
Delete strategy (deleted-record endpoint/webhook, or why full refresh is required)
- Distinctive: line 73
If proposing a full refresh, the exact provider limitation that blocks checkpoints from the docs/sample response
- Distinctive: line 84
Use the Nango HTTP API for connection lookup, credentials, and proxy calls outside function code.
- Distinctive: line 85
Add an API doc link comment above each provider call.
- Very specific: line 89
Do not set deprecated function definition routing fields: action endpoint and sync endpoints.
- Very specific: line 97
Default to nango.paginate(...) + nango.batchSave(...).
- Very specific: line 98
Prefer batchDelete() when the provider returns deletions, tombstones, or delete webhooks.
- Distinctive: line 99
Use full refresh only if the provider cannot return changes, deletions, or resume state, or if the dataset is tiny.
- Very specific: line 102
Never combine trackDeletesStart() / trackDeletesEnd() with changed-only checkpoints (modified_after, updated_after, changed-records …
- Very specific: line 104
If a sync requires metadata (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 109
Prefer explicit field names.
- Very specific: line 110
Add .describe() examples for IDs, timestamps, enums, and URLs.
- Very specific: line 111
Avoid any; use inline mapping types.
- Very specific: line 113
Use nango.zodValidateInput() only when you need custom validation or logging.
- Very specific: line 117
Default non-required inputs to .optional().
- Very specific: line 118
Use .nullable() only when null has meaning, usually clear-on-update.
- Very specific: line 121
Default generated schemas to .optional() for non-required inputs and normalized outputs.
- Very specific: line 122
Prefer .nullable() over z.union([z.null(), T]) or z.union([T, z.null()]).
- Very specific: line 128
Use explicit suffixes in the API's majority casing: IDs (user_id, userId), names (channel_name, channelName), emails (user_email, …
- Very specific: line 146
If the API is snake_case, use user_id instead.
- Distinctive: line 164
If web fetching returns incomplete docs (JS-rendered):
- Distinctive: line 165
Ask the user for a sample response
- Distinctive: line 166
Use existing Nango actions or syncs in the workspace as a pattern when they exist
- Distinctive: line 167
Use the skill-specific validation or dryrun workflow until it passes
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Build Nango Functions
Build Nango action and sync implementations without choosing the execution workflow.
This skill covers the function design contract: schemas, provider calls, action outputs, sync models, checkpoints, deletion handling, metadata, retries, and runtime constraints. It intentionally does not cover local CLI validation/deploy or remote API compile/dryrun/deploy.
If the task becomes clearly local/CLI-based, use building-nango-functions-locally instead. If it becomes clearly remote/API-based, use building-nango-functions-remotely instead.
Implementation Scope
- Build or modify a Nango function implementation
- Build an action in Nango with
createAction() - Build a sync in Nango with
createSync() - Use the active workflow skill for compile, dryrun, test, and deploy mechanics
Sync Strategy Gate (required before writing code)
If the task is a sync, read references/syncs.md before writing code and state one of these paths first:
- Checkpoint plan:
- change source (
updated_at,modified_since, changed-records endpoint, cursor, page token, offset/page,since_id, or webhook) - checkpoint schema
- how the checkpoint changes the provider request or resume state
- whether the request still walks the full dataset or returns changed rows only
- delete strategy
- change source (
- Full refresh blocker:
- exact provider limitation from the docs or sample payloads
- why checkpoints cannot work here
Invalid sync implementations:
- full refresh because it is simpler
saveCheckpoint()withoutgetCheckpoint()- reading or saving a checkpoint without using it in request params or pagination state
- using
syncType: 'incremental'ornango.lastSyncDatein a new sync - using
trackDeletesStart()/trackDeletesEnd()with a changed-only checkpoint (modified_after,updated_after, changed-records endpoint). Those requests omit unchanged rows, sotrackDeletesEnd()will falsely delete them. - using
trackDeletesStart()/trackDeletesEnd()in an incremental sync that already has explicit deleted-record events
Choose the Path
Action:
- One-time request, user-triggered, built with
createAction() - Read
references/actions.mdbefore writing code
Sync:
- Scheduled or webhook-driven cache updates built with
createSync() - Complete the Sync Strategy Gate first
- Read
references/syncs.mdbefore writing code
Required Inputs (Ask User if Missing)
Always:
- Integration ID (provider name)
- Script/function name (kebab-case)
- API reference URL or sample response
- Connection ID if the active workflow will validate or dryrun the function
Action-specific:
- Use case summary
- Input parameters
- Output fields
- Metadata JSON if required
- Test input JSON if the active workflow will validate or dryrun the action (use
{}for no-input actions)
Sync-specific:
- Model name (singular, PascalCase)
- Frequency (every hour, every 5 minutes, etc.)
- Checkpoint schema (timestamp, cursor, page token, offset/page,
since_id, or composite) - How the checkpoint changes the provider request or resume state
- Delete strategy (deleted-record endpoint/webhook, or why full refresh is required)
- If proposing a full refresh, the exact provider limitation that blocks checkpoints from the docs/sample response
- Metadata JSON if required (team_id, workspace_id)
If any required external values are missing, ask a targeted question after checking the repo and provider docs. For syncs, choose a checkpoint plus deletion strategy whenever the provider supports one. If you cannot find a viable checkpoint strategy, state exactly why before writing a full refresh.
Non-Negotiable Rules
Shared platform constraints
- Nango functions use
createAction()/createSync(). - You cannot add arbitrary packages. Use relative imports only when the chosen workflow supports them; built-ins include
zod,crypto/node:crypto, andurl/node:url. - Use the Nango HTTP API for connection lookup, credentials, and proxy calls outside function code. Do not invent CLI token or connection commands.
- Add an API doc link comment above each provider call.
- Action outputs cannot exceed 2MB.
- File uploads and downloads cannot be implemented as actions (sandboxed runtime: no
fs, noaxios, 2 MB output limit). Use a proxy script in{integration}/proxy/with@nangohq/nodeinstead — seereferences/actions.md. - HTTP retries default to
0; setretriesdeliberately. Treat3as the normal maximum; for sync provider calls, values above3are effectively forbidden unless docs prove they are safe and necessary. Avoid retries for non-idempotent writes unless the API supports idempotency. - Do not set deprecated function definition routing fields: action
endpointand syncendpoints. Trigger actions by action name through the SDK/API, and consume sync records through the records API.
Sync rules
- Sync records need a stable string
id. - New syncs should define a
checkpointschema, callnango.getCheckpoint()first, andnango.saveCheckpoint()after each page or batch. - A checkpoint is valid only if it changes the request or resume state (
since,updated_after,cursor,page_token,offset,page,since_id, etc.). Saving one without using it is not incremental sync. - New syncs must not use
syncType: 'incremental'ornango.lastSyncDate. - Default to
nango.paginate(...)+nango.batchSave(...). Avoid manualwhile (true)loops whencursor,link, oroffsetpagination fits. - Prefer
batchDelete()when the provider returns deletions, tombstones, or delete webhooks. - Use full refresh only if the provider cannot return changes, deletions, or resume state, or if the dataset is tiny.
- For full refresh, cite the exact provider limitation from docs or payloads. "It is easier" is not enough.
deleteRecordsFromPreviousExecutions()is deprecated. For full refresh, calltrackDeletesStart()before fetch/save andtrackDeletesEnd()only after a successful full fetch/save.- Never combine
trackDeletesStart()/trackDeletesEnd()with changed-only checkpoints (modified_after,updated_after, changed-records endpoints, etc.). They omit unchanged rows, sotrackDeletesEnd()would delete them. - Checkpointed full refreshes are still full refreshes. Call
trackDeletesEnd()only in the run that finishes the full window. - If a sync requires metadata (e.g.
team_id,workspace_id,guild_id), setautoStart: false. The sync cannot run until the caller has set the metadata, so starting it automatically would fail.
Conventions
- Match field casing to the external API. Passthrough fields keep provider casing; non-passthrough fields should use the majority casing of that API.
- Prefer explicit field names.
- Add
.describe()examples for IDs, timestamps, enums, and URLs. - Avoid
any; use inline mapping types. - List actions should expose
cursorplus a next-cursor field in the majority casing of that API (next_cursor,nextCursor, etc.). - Use
nango.zodValidateInput()only when you need custom validation or logging; otherwise rely on schemas plus the chosen validation workflow.
Schema Semantics
- Default non-required inputs to
.optional(). - Use
.nullable()only whennullhas meaning, usually clear-on-update; add.optional()when callers may omit the field too. - Raw provider schemas should match the provider:
.optional()for omitted fields,.nullable()for explicitnull,.nullish()only when the provider truly does both. - Final action outputs and normalized sync models should prefer
.optional()and normalize upstreamnullto omission unlessnullmatters. - Default generated schemas to
.optional()for non-required inputs and normalized outputs; widen only when the upstream contract justifies it. - Prefer
.nullable()overz.union([z.null(), T])orz.union([T, z.null()]). - Return
nullonly when the output schema allows it. z.object()strips unknown keys by default. For provider pass-through usez.object({}).passthrough(),z.record(z.unknown()), orz.unknown()with minimal refinements.
Field Naming and Casing Rules
- Use explicit suffixes in the API's majority casing: IDs (
user_id,userId), names (channel_name,channelName), emails (user_email,userEmail), URLs (callback_url,callbackUrl), and timestamps (created_at,createdAt).
Mapping example (API expects a different parameter name):
const InputSchema = z.object({
userId: z.string()
});
const config: ProxyConfiguration = {
endpoint: 'users.info',
params: {
user: input.userId
},
retries: 3
};If the API is snake_case, use user_id instead. The goal is API consistency.
References
- Action patterns, CRUD examples, metadata usage, and ActionError examples:
references/actions.md - Sync patterns, concrete checkpoint examples, delete strategies, and full refresh fallback:
references/syncs.md
Useful Nango docs (quick links)
- Functions runtime SDK reference: https://nango.dev/docs/reference/functions
- Implement an action: https://nango.dev/docs/implementation-guides/use-cases/actions/implement-an-action
- Implement a sync: https://nango.dev/docs/implementation-guides/use-cases/syncs/implement-a-sync
- Checkpoints: https://nango.dev/docs/implementation-guides/use-cases/syncs/checkpoints
- Deletion detection (full vs incremental): https://nango.dev/docs/implementation-guides/use-cases/syncs/deletion-detection
- Testing integrations (dryrun,
--save, Vitest): https://nango.dev/docs/implementation-guides/platform/functions/testing - Nango HTTP API reference: https://nango.dev/docs/reference/api
When API Docs Do Not Render
If web fetching returns incomplete docs (JS-rendered):
- Ask the user for a sample response
- Use existing Nango actions or syncs in the workspace as a pattern when they exist
- Use the skill-specific validation or dryrun workflow until it passes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

