forge-scribe
Skill2 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Owner-wish ledger: every ask kept verbatim until done+acked. Use for: onthoud dit, wat wilde ik ook alweer, ik heb nog een wijziging, note my change, scrap that, open wishes, did I ask that.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ForgeyClap/Forge-Coreedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- ForgeyClap/Forge-Core★ 256% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository74 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormingSkill
- claude-md-improverSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- forge-agent-reportSkill
- forge-agentSkill
- forge-apiSkill
- forge-botsSkill
- forge-brainstormSkill
- forge-cliSkill
- forge-cmsSkill
- forge-code-reviewSkill
- forge-councilSkill
- forge-dataSkill
- forge-debugSkill
- forge-deeplearnSkill
- forge-docdriftSkill
- forge-doctorSkill
- forge-ecommerceSkill
- forge-electronSkill
- forge-extensionSkill
- forge-figmaSkill
- forge-fullstackSkill
- forge-gameSkill
- forge-graded-verifySkill
- forge-guardianSkill
- forge-heartbeatSkill
- forge-intakeSkill
- forge-integrationSkill
- forge-mcp-clientsSkill
- forge-migrationSkill
- forge-mindmapSkill
- forge-mlopsSkill
- forge-mobileSkill
- forge-n8nSkill
- forge-nightshiftSkill
- forge-paymentsSkill
- forge-prdSkill
- forge-predictionSkill
- forge-projectbrainSkill
- forge-prompt-coachSkill
- forge-qualitySkill
- forge-ragSkill
- forge-registrySkill
- forge-reportSkill
- forge-routerSkill
- forge-scoutSkill
- forge-scrapingSkill
- forge-skill-testingSkill
- forge-snapshotSkill
- forge-verifySkill
- forge-voiceSkill
- forge-websiteSkill
- forge-worktreesSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Self-improvement substrate: before applying this skill, read learnings.md in this skill's own folder and honor its corrections.
- Very specific: line 12
Every owner prompt is kept word-for-word (secrets scrubbed) and becomes a tracked item R-n that stays visible until it is planned, done …
- Very specific: line 24
Not for: storing a standing rule directly (that is /forge remember), writing a PRD (forge-prd), or taking meeting minutes of a document.
- Very specific: line 28
Only DIGEST.md (<= 1200 chars) goes back into context.
- Very specific: line 76
Never report an item as planned, done or acked unless forge-scribe.cjs output says so.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Forge Scribe — never lose what the owner asked
Self-improvement substrate: before applying this skill, read learnings.md in this skill's own folder
and honor its corrections. After a run that produced a genuine correction, append it there with a date
and real evidence — never invent a lesson.
Every owner prompt is kept word-for-word (secrets scrubbed) and becomes a tracked item R-n that stays
visible until it is planned, done with evidence and acked by the owner. The only way to change
scribe state is node .claude/forge-bin/forge-scribe.cjs. Never edit the files under .claude/forge-scribe/
by hand.
When to use
- The owner sends a new wish, change, cancel or preference mid-project ("onthoud dit", "ik heb nog een wijziging", "note my change", "scrap that", "voortaan…").
- The owner asks what they asked before ("wat wilde ik ook alweer", "open wensen", "did you miss anything I asked").
- End-of-run reconciliation (before finalize) and on resume of a long project.
Not for: storing a standing rule directly (that is /forge remember), writing a PRD (forge-prd), or
taking meeting minutes of a document.
Context rule
Only DIGEST.md (<= 1200 chars) goes back into context. Never paste inbox.jsonl or ledger.jsonl.
Wiring (hooks, rule, finalize)
The hook prints [forge-scribe] Genoteerd: R-n … per captured prompt (the digest only when it changed); act on it.
A Stop reminder blocks once per unplanned item; before completion log owner_requests_reconciled (the writer refuses
it unless gate is OK) — see config/orchestration/HOOKS_OPT_IN.md section 7.
Lifecycle
unclassified -> open -> planned -> in-progress -> done (evidence) -> acked (owner);
side states: defer-proposed (an agent's defer, with reason; NOT final until the owner acks it, then deferred = a recorded carry-over), cancelled (owner), superseded, answered.
| Step | Command (node .claude/forge-bin/forge-scribe.cjs ...) |
capture (automatic: the UserPromptSubmit hook forge-scribe-hook.cjs; by hand only for a missed prompt) | capture --text "<prompt>" --source cli --transcript <path> |
| settle an unclassified item | classify R-n change (split a multi-ask: --split "<exact quote>" per ask) |
| mid-run change: which packages? | impact R-n --run <run_id> (read-only proposal) |
| plan it | link R-n --wp wp-3,wp-5 --run <run_id> |
| start / done | transition R-n start · transition R-n done --evidence wp_completed:wp-3 --run <run_id> |
propose a carry-over (becomes defer-proposed; needs the owner's ack) | transition R-n defer --reason "<why>" |
| question answered | transition R-n answer --reason "<where>" |
| owner ack / cancel | transition R-n ack --prompt P-n (--pid is kept as an alias). P-n must be a hook-captured owner prompt with a clear yes for that exact R-id in the same sentence; no other wording counts as owner approval |
| status | list --status open,planned --json · digest --write |
| gate | gate (run) · gate --final (programme end: also done-but-unacked) — exit 3 = blocked |
Evidence types: wp_completed:<wp_id> (linked wp, real event in the run), check_passed:<event_id>,
commit:<sha>, standing_rule:<rule id> (preference items only).
Preferences
A preference item ("voortaan…", "always…") is NOT stored as a rule by the scribe. Run
forge-scribe.cjs route R-n, ask the owner to confirm, then forge-standing.cjs remember "<text>"
(the existing /forge remember path) and close with done --evidence standing_rule:<id>.
Mid-run change protocol
impact R-n --run <id>→ proposed wp_ids. 2. Confirm withlink. 3. Amend a not-started package, or re-create a completed one as a newagent_work_package_createdwithsupersedesandreq_ids:["R-n"].- Head Chef triages only that delta.
Acks are batched
At the end of a run present ONE list of done-unacked items to the owner (batch-the-asks rule). Never pause mid-run per item. Ack/cancel are refused unless the prompt is a real owner message in the session transcript — a classifier, not a proof.
When to dispatch the Scribe agent (sonnet/low, GOAT quick route)
The scribe specialist (.claude/agents/scribe.md, exec-reviewer class, no Write/Edit) is dispatched by
the Lead only for a prompt flagged multi_ask (3+ asks), end-of-run reconciliation, or a resume with
= 20 open items. The normal path costs no LLM call: the Lead runs the CLI directly.
Honesty
Never report an item as planned, done or acked unless forge-scribe.cjs output says so; quote the
literal gate exit code.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

