visual-audit
Skill5 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
The 10-second design audit. Look at any design and name what's working and what's not within seconds. Trains rapid pattern recognition for hierarchy, spacing, type, and color. Use when evaluating designs quickly, giving first-impression feedback, or building perception speed.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Look at any design and name what's working and what's not.
- Distinctive: line 18
MUST identify the primary visual element within 3 seconds of looking
- Distinctive: line 19
MUST name 3 specific observations (not feelings) within 10 seconds
- Distinctive: line 20
MUST distinguish between observations ("the CTA is the same weight as the nav") and reactions ("it looks cluttered")
- Distinctive: line 21
NEVER use vague words: clean, nice, modern, sleek, beautiful, stunning, minimal, bold
- Distinctive: line 22
SHOULD replace every vague word with a specific observation about hierarchy, weight, rhythm, density, or contrast
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Visual Audit
Look at any design and name what's working and what's not. Fast.
How to use
/visual-auditApply rapid perception constraints to evaluate any design in this conversation./visual-audit <url or screenshot>Run a 10-second audit on the described or provided design.
Constraints
The 10-Second Rule
- MUST identify the primary visual element within 3 seconds of looking
- MUST name 3 specific observations (not feelings) within 10 seconds
- MUST distinguish between observations ("the CTA is the same weight as the nav") and reactions ("it looks cluttered")
- NEVER use vague words: clean, nice, modern, sleek, beautiful, stunning, minimal, bold
- SHOULD replace every vague word with a specific observation about hierarchy, weight, rhythm, density, or contrast
What to Observe
- Where does the eye go first? Is that intentional?
- How many type sizes are visible? Is there a clear scale?
- What's the spacing system? Is it consistent?
- How many colors are in use? What roles do they play?
- What's the density? Does it match the use case?
- What states are visible? What states are missing?
Output Structure
- First: name the design's apparent intent (what it's trying to do)
- Second: name what's working (specific decisions, not aesthetics)
- Third: name what's not working (specific decisions, with reasoning)
- Fourth: one change that would have the most impact
Anti-Patterns
- Listing only positive observations to be polite
- Jumping to solutions before diagnosing the problem
- Evaluating aesthetics instead of decisions
- Giving feedback about style preferences rather than quality signals
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.6ksame name
- clearsmog/claude-skills★ 2same name
- xsovad06/sova★ 2same name
- qmertesdorf/GameForge★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- absence-auditSkill
- decision-tracingSkill
- system-deconstructionSkill
- version-archaeologySkill
- audience-translationSkill
- critique-vocabularySkill
- design-rationaleSkill
- written-critiqueSkill
- field-notesSkill
- learning-by-makingSkill
- quality-checklistSkill
- self-assessmentSkill
- flow-patternsSkill
- motion-designSkill
- timing-feedbackSkill
- constraint-evaluationSkill
- design-rankingSkill
- taste-as-strategySkill
- taste-gapSkill
- taste-vs-trendsSkill
- tradeoff-assessmentSkill
- consumption-disciplineSkill
- cross-domain-seeingSkill
- detail-observationSkill
- screenshot-surgerySkill
- cross-pollinationSkill
- library-architectureSkill
- principle-taggingSkill
- daily-routinesSkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- teaching-tasteSkill
- type-as-signalSkill
- type-selectionSkill
- type-systemsSkill
- color-systemsSkill
- craft-signalsSkill
- hierarchy-principlesSkill
- spatial-rhythmSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

