process-documentation
Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a messy, unwritten, or "only one person knows how" workflow into a clear standard operating procedure (SOP) anyone can follow. Use when someone describes how a process works today, pastes rough notes or a voice-memo transcript about a workflow, asks for an SOP, a runbook, a how-to, or says "can you write down how we do X.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- brigittelyons/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 27, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- brigittelyons/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beta-program-managerSkill
- cross-team-dependency-mapSkill
- customer-advisory-board-prepSkill
- data-request-routerSkill
- decision-logSkill
- deprecation-planSkill
- duplicate-request-mergingSkill
- experiment-logSkill
- feature-flag-trackingSkill
- feedback-taggingSkill
- information-debt-auditSkill
- internal-enablement-briefSkill
- kpi-health-checkSkill
- launch-readiness-checklistSkill
- meeting-to-action-converterSkill
- new-pm-onboarding-packSkill
- pricing-packaging-change-logSkill
- product-metrics-definitionsSkill
- product-ops-contextSkill
- quarterly-planning-prepSkill
- raci-builderSkill
- release-notes-draftingSkill
- request-intake-triageSkill
- retro-facilitationSkill
- ritual-calendarSkill
- roadmap-hygieneSkill
- sprint-review-summarySkill
- support-escalation-patternsSkill
- tool-stack-auditSkill
- vendor-evaluation-scorecardSkill
- voice-of-customer-digestSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Tools: every system, form, or file touched
- Distinctive: line 28
If any of these is missing and the SOP can't work without it, list it as an open question instead of guessing.
- Distinctive: line 56
Every step starts with a verb.
- Distinctive: line 59
Put decision points inline: "If the request is over $5k, skip to step 7."
- Distinctive: line 61
No history, rationale, or backstory in the steps.
- Distinctive: line 65
Before handing over, read it as a new hire would.
- Distinctive: line 67
If the process has many handoffs, offer a swim lane diagram (one lane per role) alongside the written steps.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Process documentation
A good SOP lets someone who has never done the task finish it correctly on the first try, without asking the person who wrote it. Write for that reader.
Before you start
If .agents/product-ops-context.md exists (or .claude/product-ops-context.md), read it first. Use the team, owners, tools, meetings, and metric definitions it already has, and only ask for what's missing or specific to this task. If it doesn't exist, go ahead with what you're given, and suggest running product-ops-context once so the next skill doesn't have to ask.
Step 1: Extract the process
From the source, pull out:
- Trigger: what starts the process (a request, a date, an event)
- Outcome: what "done" looks like, concretely
- Roles: who does each part
- Tools: every system, form, or file touched
- Steps: in order, including handoffs between people
- Decision points: places where the path splits ("if X, do Y")
- Known failure points: where it usually breaks or stalls
If any of these is missing and the SOP can't work without it, list it as an open question instead of guessing. Mark guesses clearly if the person asks you to fill gaps.
Step 2: Write the SOP
# [Process name]
**Owner:** [person responsible for keeping this current]
**Last reviewed:** [date]
**Use this when:** [the trigger, in one sentence]
**Done means:** [the outcome, in one sentence]
## Before you start
- Access needed: [tools, permissions]
- Inputs needed: [files, info, approvals]
## Steps
1. **[Verb + object].** [What to do, where, and how you know it worked.]
2. ...
## If something goes wrong
| Problem | What to do | Who to ask |
|---|---|---|
## Open questions
- [Anything the source didn't answer]Rules:
- Every step starts with a verb.
- One action per step. If a step has "and then," split it.
- Name the exact tool, button, field, or folder. "Update the tracker" is not a step; "In the Launch Tracker sheet, set Status to Shipped" is.
- Put decision points inline: "If the request is over $5k, skip to step 7."
- Handoffs get their own step, naming who receives what.
- No history, rationale, or backstory in the steps. If it matters, add a short "Why this works this way" section at the end.
Step 3: Test it
Before handing over, read it as a new hire would. Flag any step where they'd have to ask someone a question, and either fix it or add it to Open questions.
If the process has many handoffs, offer a swim lane diagram (one lane per role) alongside the written steps.
Related skills
- information-debt-audit — find which processes need writing down
- raci-builder — name an owner for each step
- new-pm-onboarding-pack — hand new hires the SOPs that matter
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

