agentleFS
CharleneTStrainCharleneTStrain/product-ops-skills/skills/process-documentation/SKILL.md

process-documentation

Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turn a messy, unwritten, or "only one person knows how" workflow into a clear standard operating procedure (SOP) anyone can follow. Use when someone describes how a process works today, pastes rough notes or a voice-memo transcript about a workflow, asks for an SOP, a runbook, a how-to, or says "can you write down how we do X.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Tools: every system, form, or file touched

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    If any of these is missing and the SOP can't work without it, list it as an open question instead of guessing.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Every step starts with a verb.

    line 56
  4. Distinctive:

    Put decision points inline: "If the request is over $5k, skip to step 7."

    line 59
  5. Distinctive:

    No history, rationale, or backstory in the steps.

    line 61
  6. Distinctive:

    Before handing over, read it as a new hire would.

    line 65
  7. Distinctive:

    If the process has many handoffs, offer a swim lane diagram (one lane per role) alongside the written steps.

    line 67

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Process documentation

A good SOP lets someone who has never done the task finish it correctly on the first try, without asking the person who wrote it. Write for that reader.

Before you start

If .agents/product-ops-context.md exists (or .claude/product-ops-context.md), read it first. Use the team, owners, tools, meetings, and metric definitions it already has, and only ask for what's missing or specific to this task. If it doesn't exist, go ahead with what you're given, and suggest running product-ops-context once so the next skill doesn't have to ask.

Step 1: Extract the process

From the source, pull out:

  • Trigger: what starts the process (a request, a date, an event)
  • Outcome: what "done" looks like, concretely
  • Roles: who does each part
  • Tools: every system, form, or file touched
  • Steps: in order, including handoffs between people
  • Decision points: places where the path splits ("if X, do Y")
  • Known failure points: where it usually breaks or stalls

If any of these is missing and the SOP can't work without it, list it as an open question instead of guessing. Mark guesses clearly if the person asks you to fill gaps.

Step 2: Write the SOP

# [Process name]
**Owner:** [person responsible for keeping this current]
**Last reviewed:** [date]
**Use this when:** [the trigger, in one sentence]
**Done means:** [the outcome, in one sentence]

## Before you start
- Access needed: [tools, permissions]
- Inputs needed: [files, info, approvals]

## Steps
1. **[Verb + object].** [What to do, where, and how you know it worked.]
2. ...

## If something goes wrong
| Problem | What to do | Who to ask |
|---|---|---|

## Open questions
- [Anything the source didn't answer]

Rules:

  • Every step starts with a verb.
  • One action per step. If a step has "and then," split it.
  • Name the exact tool, button, field, or folder. "Update the tracker" is not a step; "In the Launch Tracker sheet, set Status to Shipped" is.
  • Put decision points inline: "If the request is over $5k, skip to step 7."
  • Handoffs get their own step, naming who receives what.
  • No history, rationale, or backstory in the steps. If it matters, add a short "Why this works this way" section at the end.

Step 3: Test it

Before handing over, read it as a new hire would. Flag any step where they'd have to ask someone a question, and either fix it or add it to Open questions.

If the process has many handoffs, offer a swim lane diagram (one lane per role) alongside the written steps.

Related skills

  • information-debt-audit — find which processes need writing down
  • raci-builder — name an owner for each step
  • new-pm-onboarding-pack — hand new hires the SOPs that matter

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.