launch-readiness-checklist
Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Check whether a feature or product launch is actually ready to ship across every team, and produce a go / no-go readout with owners on every gap. Use when someone asks "are we ready to launch," wants a launch checklist, a readiness review, a pre-launch audit, or is prepping for a go / no-go meeting.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- BitCrowder/ai-product-dev-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- BitCrowder/ai-product-dev-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beta-program-managerSkill
- cross-team-dependency-mapSkill
- customer-advisory-board-prepSkill
- data-request-routerSkill
- decision-logSkill
- deprecation-planSkill
- duplicate-request-mergingSkill
- experiment-logSkill
- feature-flag-trackingSkill
- feedback-taggingSkill
- information-debt-auditSkill
- internal-enablement-briefSkill
- kpi-health-checkSkill
- meeting-to-action-converterSkill
- new-pm-onboarding-packSkill
- pricing-packaging-change-logSkill
- process-documentationSkill
- product-metrics-definitionsSkill
- product-ops-contextSkill
- quarterly-planning-prepSkill
- raci-builderSkill
- release-notes-draftingSkill
- request-intake-triageSkill
- retro-facilitationSkill
- ritual-calendarSkill
- roadmap-hygieneSkill
- sprint-review-summarySkill
- support-escalation-patternsSkill
- tool-stack-auditSkill
- vendor-evaluation-scorecardSkill
- voice-of-customer-digestSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Ask (or infer from what's given) which tier this is.
- Distinctive: line 80
Every open item has exactly one owner.
- Distinctive: line 81
If anything in the source is undecided, list it as a blocker or risk.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Launch readiness checklist
A launch is ready when every team that touches a customer knows what's changing and has what they need. Engineering finishing the build is one row, not the whole answer.
Before you start
If .agents/product-ops-context.md exists (or .claude/product-ops-context.md), read it first. Use the team, owners, tools, meetings, and metric definitions it already has, and only ask for what's missing or specific to this task. If it doesn't exist, go ahead with what you're given, and suggest running product-ops-context once so the next skill doesn't have to ask.
Step 1: Size the launch
Ask (or infer from what's given) which tier this is. The tier decides how many rows apply.
| Tier | What it looks like | Rows that apply |
| 1, major | New product, pricing change, or something customers must act on | All rows |
| 2, notable | Meaningful new feature for existing customers | All except press and analyst |
| 3, minor | Small improvement or fix | Product, docs, support, release notes |
Step 2: Walk the checklist
For each row that applies, mark Ready, At risk, Not started, or Not needed, and name an owner. Only mark Ready when there's evidence (a link, a date, a confirmation), not an assumption.
Product and engineering
- Feature complete and tested in a production-like environment
- Rollout plan set (everyone at once, percentage, or flag)
- Rollback plan exists
- Tracking in place for the metric that defines success
Documentation
- Help center article written or updated
- Release notes drafted
- Internal FAQ for customer-facing teams
Customer-facing teams
- Support briefed, with known issues and workarounds
- Sales briefed: what it is, who it's for, what not to promise
- Customer success knows which accounts to tell first
Marketing and comms
- Positioning and core message approved
- Website, in-app, and email changes scheduled
- Social, press, or analyst plans (Tier 1 only)
Commercial and legal
- Pricing and packaging decided and reflected in billing
- Legal, security, or privacy review done if data handling changed
Measurement
- Success metric and target written down
- Date set to review results
Step 3: Write the readout
# Launch readiness: [Feature] — [Target date]
Tier: [1/2/3]
Recommendation: GO / GO WITH RISKS / NO-GO
## Blockers (must fix before launch)
- [Item] — Owner: [name] — Due: [date]
## Risks (can launch, but watch)
- [Item] — Owner: [name] — Mitigation: [one line]
## Ready
- [Short list, grouped by team]
## Not needed for this tier
- [Rows skipped]Rules:
- Every open item has exactly one owner. "Marketing" is not an owner; a person is.
- If anything in the source is undecided, list it as a blocker or risk. Do not mark it Ready.
- Recommend NO-GO when any customer-facing team would learn about the change from a customer.
Related skills
- internal-enablement-brief — brief sales, support, and success once it's a go
- release-notes-drafting — tell customers what shipped
- cross-team-dependency-map — find who's still waiting on whom before launch day
- feature-flag-tracking — record who the launch is on for
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

