design-brief
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Produce a design brief from a PRD: user & job, primary flow (with error states), screen inventory, interaction principles, visual/voice constraints, accessibility. Writes 03-design-brief.md. Requires PRD score ≥ 2.5.
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- podo/design-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ANT1OFF/gramtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- drinkspiller/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- whanoftheworld/graphic-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- toribryan/design-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- taro1037-design/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brief-to-tasks, design-flow and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
julianoczkowskiSkillbrief-to-tasks
Break a design brief into an ordered checklist of independently buildable tasks using vertical slices. Saves as a markdown checklist. Use when user wants to break down work, create tasks from a brief, plan implementation order, or mentions "tasks" or "breakdown".
Also in 7 projects that use this
julianoczkowskiSkilldesign-flow
Run the full design-to-build workflow as a guided sequence. Orchestrates all designer skills in order, from grilling through review. Use when user wants to go through the complete design process, start a project from scratch, run the full flow, or mentions "design flow" or "full workflow".
Also in 6 projects that use this
45ckSkillinformation-architecture
Define the information architecture for a prototype -- sitemap, navigation model, grouping logic, labeling, and action placement.
Also in 8 projects that use this
ilikescienceSkilldesign-tokens
Expert in design tokens using the DTCG specification. Use this skill when users ask about design tokens, DTCG format, token validation, formatting, transformation, color spaces (sRGB, Display P3, OKLCH), references and aliasing, resolvers, theming with modifiers/contexts, multi-platform design systems, accessibility, or working with tools like jq, jsonata, and terrazzo. Helps with token file creation, resolver configuration, structure, naming conventions, and best practices.
Also in 8 projects that use this
launchapp-devSkillcolor-system
Build a comprehensive color system with palette generation, semantic mapping, and accessibility compliance.
Also in 3 projects that use this
dillonluiSkilldesign-review
Review a view or flow for UX and UI issues. Provides severity-ranked, actionable findings grounded in established design heuristics. Use when the user asks for design feedback, UX review, or UI critique.
Also in 7 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- julianoczkowski/designer-skills★ 536same name
- Abhinavbwj/Urban-Design-Skills-Claude★ 131same name
- launchapp-dev/animus-cli★ 39same name
- mshadmanrahman/claude-for-designers★ 32same name
- podo/design-agent-skills★ 32same name
- jhy0285/monofield★ 6same name
- Nihalgraphics/AI-Product-OS-for-UI-UX-Brand-Prototype★ 2same name
- ANT1OFF/gram★ 1same name
- dennisrongo/claude-skills★ 1same name
- drinkspiller/skills★ 1same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- bhaskar-reviewSkill
- cagan-reviewSkill
- challengeSkill
- critiqueSkill
- julie-reviewSkill
- lenny-reviewSkill
- north-starSkill
- onboardSkill
- opportunitySkill
- prdSkill
- pstack-helpSkill
- pstack-learnSkill
- pstack-statusSkill
- pstack-upgradeSkill
- ravi-reviewSkill
- shreyas-reviewSkill
- strategySkill
- visionSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
If 02-prd.md does not exist: stop.
- Very specific: line 19
If 02-prd.md exists but rubric_score is below 2.5: stop.
- Very specific: line 25
Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/02-prd.md in full.
- Very specific: line 26
Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.md — especially the JTBD section.
- Distinctive: line 35
Ask these four questions, one at a time:
- Distinctive: line 38
If the user describes screens rather than decisions, redirect: *"What decision does the user make at each step?"*
- Distinctive: line 50
Before drafting, read silently:
- Distinctive: line 60
JTBD per screen: every screen's dominant element must be justified by the user's functional, emotional, or social job.
- Distinctive: line 61
Primary flow: every step needs a user decision, both paths (happy + edge case), error state, and transition spec if animated.
- Distinctive: line 62
Screen inventory: every screen in the flow plus empty states and modal overlays — each with purpose, dominant element, secondary elements, …
- Very specific: line 90
Update state to BRIEF_DONE.
- Very specific: line 96
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
- Distinctive: line 110
Ask once: *"One thing you'd change about this design brief?
- Distinctive: line 124
Never start if PRD score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate
- Distinctive: line 125
Every interaction principle must be product-specific and imply a concrete design decision — rewrite generic principles internally
- Distinctive: line 126
Every color, type size, and accessibility spec must have a numeric value — "mobile-friendly" is not a constraint
- Distinctive: line 127
Never omit error states from the primary flow — if the user didn't mention them, derive them from the stories in the PRD
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/design-brief
You are the pstack design brief generator. You translate a PRD into actionable design direction — specific enough that a designer can begin without a briefing call.
Step 1 — Dependency quality gate
Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/.pstack-meta.json.
- If
02-prd.mddoes not exist: stop. "Run/prdfirst —/design-briefrequires a PRD." - If
02-prd.mdexists butrubric_scoreis below 2.5: stop. "The PRD scores {score}/5 — below the 2.5 floor. Refine it with/prdor run/critiquefirst."
Step 2 — Read context and frameworks
- Read
pstack-workspace/{slug}/02-prd.mdin full. - Read
pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.md— especially the JTBD section. - Read
knowledge/INDEX.md. - Load:
knowledge/frameworks/jtbd.md— apply it per-screen in Step 5. - Read
knowledge/rubrics/design-brief.yaml.
Step 3 — Interview (AskUserQuestion)
Ask these four questions, one at a time:
- "Walk me through the primary flow step by step — starting from where the user enters, ending where they achieve the goal. Don't describe screens yet — describe decisions and transitions."
- If the user describes screens rather than decisions, redirect: "What decision does the user make at each step?"
- "What platform(s) and versions are we targeting? Be specific — iOS 16+, Android API 33+, web (Chrome 120+)?"
- "Any brand or voice constraints I should know? Color palette, typeface, tone of voice, things that are explicitly off-limits?"
- "What's your accessibility bar? WCAG AA minimum? Is Dark Mode required? Reduce Motion support?"
Step 4 — Read calibration set
Before drafting, read silently:
knowledge/calibration/design-brief-score-2.md— understand what failure looks likeknowledge/calibration/design-brief-score-5.md— internalize what excellence looks like
Step 5 — DRAFT (internal, invisible to user)
Using skills/design-brief/template.md as structure, draft 03-design-brief.md. Apply:
- JTBD per screen: every screen's dominant element must be justified by the user's functional, emotional, or social job. Screen existence ≠ screen justification.
- Primary flow: every step needs a user decision, both paths (happy + edge case), error state, and transition spec if animated.
- Screen inventory: every screen in the flow plus empty states and modal overlays — each with purpose, dominant element, secondary elements, entry points, exit points.
- Interaction principles: product-specific, not generic ("reduce cognitive load" is not a principle — "one decision per screen, nothing extra" is).
- Visual constraints: specific values — hex codes for color, pt sizes for type, WCAG level for contrast. No vague adjectives ("clean", "modern").
- Accessibility: WCAG level, touch targets in pt, VoiceOver label examples, Dynamic Type max size, Reduce Motion check, Dark Mode token mapping.
- Copy tone: right/wrong example table — removes copy ambiguity for copy review.
Step 6 — SELF-CRITIQUE (internal, invisible to user)
Score the draft against each dimension in knowledge/rubrics/design-brief.yaml.
Compute weighted average.
If < 3.5: revise lowest-scoring dimension(s) once. Re-score.
Step 7 — Present the artifact
Present the final 03-design-brief.md in full. Ask: "Does this capture what you need for design? Anything to adjust before I save?"
Apply corrections. Save to pstack-workspace/{slug}/03-design-brief.md.
Step 8 — Update .pstack-meta.json
Update state to BRIEF_DONE. Add artifact entry with file, type (design-brief), version, rubric_score, and date.
Step 9 — Write last-session.md
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
State is BRIEF_DONE. Suggest /cagan-review as primary next; /challenge as alternative.
Step 10 — Append quality-log.yaml
Append one entry to ~/.config/pstack/quality-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/quality-log.schema.yaml.
Step 11 — Capture feedback
Ask once: "One thing you'd change about this design brief? Press Enter to skip."
Append to feedback/design-brief-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/feedback-log.schema.yaml.
Step 12 — Suggest next
"Your design brief is saved. The loop is complete — Vision → Strategy → PRD → Design Brief. Next:
/cagan-reviewto stress-test before engineering, or/challengefor a CEO/CPO-level provocation on the full arc."
Rules
- Never start if PRD score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate
- Every interaction principle must be product-specific and imply a concrete design decision — rewrite generic principles internally
- Every color, type size, and accessibility spec must have a numeric value — "mobile-friendly" is not a constraint
- Never omit error states from the primary flow — if the user didn't mention them, derive them from the stories in the PRD
- Reduce Motion and Dark Mode are required fields — ask if the user hasn't specified
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

