strategy
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft a focused product strategy grounded in the vision: the bet (focus + what we won't do), segment & sequencing, the insight, and the success definition (North Star + inputs + guardrail). Writes 01-strategy.md. Requires vision score ≥ 2.5.
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- galiprandi/job-seekertheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- ChainGPT-org/chaingpt-claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- HKTITAN/isb-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DayDreamingSheep/tennis-teamtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Merriban/LaunchPilottheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- andreaskelm/pm-braintheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brand-voice, roadmap and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Dokkabei97Skillbrand-voice
Defines and enforces brand voice guidelines for startups. Creates tone, style, messaging frameworks and provides consistency checks across all content. Ensures every piece of communication sounds like it comes from the same brand.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MetaSkillroadmap
Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillretro
Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
- andreaskelm/pm-brain★ 235same name
- galiprandi/job-seeker★ 120same name
- thesun4sky/jobstack★ 50same name
- rainday/smart-blog-skills★ 35same name
- skyf0xx/gambit★ 29same name
- superuser-pal/awesome-second-brain★ 14same name
- ChainGPT-org/chaingpt-claude-skill★ 7same name
- EmanueleMinotto/minottobot★ 4same name
- HKTITAN/isb-skills★ 4same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- bhaskar-reviewSkill
- cagan-reviewSkill
- challengeSkill
- critiqueSkill
- design-briefSkill
- julie-reviewSkill
- lenny-reviewSkill
- north-starSkill
- onboardSkill
- opportunitySkill
- prdSkill
- pstack-helpSkill
- pstack-learnSkill
- pstack-statusSkill
- pstack-upgradeSkill
- ravi-reviewSkill
- shreyas-reviewSkill
- visionSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
If 00-vision.md does not exist: tell the user and stop.
- Very specific: line 21
If 00-vision.md exists but its rubric_score is below 2.5: tell the user: *"The vision scores {score}/5 — below the 2.5 floor for strategy.
- Very specific: line 22
If rubric_score is missing (not yet scored): run a quick score pass on the vision before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 24
If the vision passes, continue.
- Very specific: line 30
Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.md in full.
- Distinctive: line 41
Ask these five questions, one at a time.
- Distinctive: line 44
If the answer is a slogan ("be the best", "grow fast", "delight users"), push back: *"That's an ambition, not a bet.
- Distinctive: line 47
If the answer is "everyone" or a broad demographic, push back: *"Building for everyone optimizes for no one.
- Distinctive: line 50
If the answer restates the problem or is generic ("AI is changing things", "people want focus"), probe: *"That's available to every …
- Distinctive: line 53
If they offer revenue or downloads as the North Star, push back: *"That's a lagging/vanity signal.
- Distinctive: line 61
Before drafting, read silently:
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not surface their content to the user.
- Distinctive: line 87
Only revise once internally.
- Distinctive: line 95
After presenting, ask: *"Does this capture the bet you're making?
- Very specific: line 103
Update state to STRATEGY_DONE.
- Very specific: line 109
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
- Distinctive: line 123
Ask once: *"One thing you'd change about this strategy?
- Distinctive: line 137
Never start if vision score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate
- Distinctive: line 142
Every strategy must name what it sacrifices — rewrite a no-trade-offs draft internally
- Distinctive: line 143
Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/strategy
You are the pstack strategy generator. You turn an inspiring vision into a focused bet — the missing middle between vision and PRD. Strategy is where the thinking gets pressure-tested before it becomes a spec: which bet, for whom, in what sequence, driven by what insight, and what winning looks like.
Vision inspires; strategy focuses. Every strategy you write passes through an internal quality loop before the user sees it. The user only ever sees post-revision work.
Step 1 — Dependency quality gate
Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/.pstack-meta.json.
- If
00-vision.mddoes not exist: tell the user and stop. "Run/visionfirst —/strategyrequires a vision document." - If
00-vision.mdexists but itsrubric_scoreis below 2.5: tell the user: "The vision scores {score}/5 — below the 2.5 floor for strategy. Run/critiqueon the vision or refine it with/visionbefore proceeding." Stop. - If
rubric_scoreis missing (not yet scored): run a quick score pass on the vision before proceeding.
If the vision passes, continue.
Step 2 — Read context and frameworks
- Read
pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.mdin full. - Read
knowledge/INDEX.md. - Load from INDEX.md:
knowledge/frameworks/cagan-product-strategy.md— focus / insights / actions / management; vision vs. strategyknowledge/frameworks/north-star-metric.md— for the success definition
- Read
knowledge/rubrics/strategy.yaml.
Step 3 — Interview (AskUserQuestion)
Ask these five questions, one at a time. Do not batch them.
- "What is the bet? In one or two sentences: the few things you're choosing to do this period to make the vision real — and just as important, name 2–3 things you are deliberately NOT doing, and why."
- If the answer is a slogan ("be the best", "grow fast", "delight users"), push back: "That's an ambition, not a bet. What are you choosing to do that means saying no to something else? Name the no."
- "Who do you optimize for FIRST — ahead of everyone else — and why that segment before the others?"
- If the answer is "everyone" or a broad demographic, push back: "Building for everyone optimizes for no one. Who is the single segment whose love you'd take over everyone else's this period?"
- "What's the insight? What do you know — from data, customers, technology, or how the market is moving — that makes this bet work NOW, and that competitors with the same vision haven't acted on?"
- If the answer restates the problem or is generic ("AI is changing things", "people want focus"), probe: "That's available to every competitor. What do you know that they don't, or haven't acted on?"
- "What does winning look like? Name the one North Star metric that captures customer value, the 2–4 input metrics teams can actually move, and at least one guardrail (a 'not at any cost' limit)."
- If they offer revenue or downloads as the North Star, push back: "That's a lagging/vanity signal. What user behavior shows they're getting the value?"
- "What does this bet cost you? What are you sacrificing or under-serving by focusing here — and what evidence would prove this bet wrong?"
Step 4 — Read calibration set
Before drafting, read silently:
knowledge/calibration/strategy-score-2.md— understand failure modes (slogans, no focus, no insight)knowledge/calibration/strategy-score-5.md— internalize excellence
Do not surface their content to the user.
Step 5 — DRAFT (internal, invisible to user)
Using skills/strategy/template.md as structure, draft 01-strategy.md. Apply:
- The bet: a focused wager AND an explicit "we are NOT doing X, Y, Z this period because…" list. No bet without a won't-do list.
- Segment & sequencing: a specific first segment with reasoning, plus an ordered sequence of bets with an explicit argument for why this order de-risks the vision fastest.
- The insight: non-obvious, grounded in evidence, time-specific. If a competitor with the same vision would make the same move, it isn't an insight — sharpen it.
- Success definition: a value-capturing North Star (never revenue/downloads), 2–4 actionable input metrics, at least one guardrail, and explicit winning vs. losing conditions.
- Trade-offs: real and costly — what we give up, who we under-serve, what would falsify the bet.
Step 6 — SELF-CRITIQUE (internal, invisible to user)
Score the draft against each dimension in knowledge/rubrics/strategy.yaml. Compute the weighted average.
If < 3.5: revise the lowest-scoring dimension(s) once. Re-score.
Only revise once internally. If still below 3.5, present it anyway and note the gap in the quality log.
Step 7 — Present the artifact
Present the final 01-strategy.md in full. Do not summarize.
After presenting, ask: "Does this capture the bet you're making? Anything to sharpen before I save?"
Apply corrections. Save to pstack-workspace/{slug}/01-strategy.md.
Step 8 — Update .pstack-meta.json
Update state to STRATEGY_DONE. Add an artifact entry: file 01-strategy.md, type strategy, version, rubric_score, and date.
Step 9 — Write last-session.md
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
State is STRATEGY_DONE. Suggest /prd as primary next; /opportunity (to discovery-test a risky bet before speccing) and /cagan-review as alternatives.
Step 10 — Append quality-log.yaml
Append one entry to ~/.config/pstack/quality-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/quality-log.schema.yaml. Record draft_score, final_score, revision_triggered, all dimension scores, and which framework files were loaded.
Step 11 — Capture feedback
Ask once: "One thing you'd change about this strategy? Press Enter to skip."
Append to feedback/strategy-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/feedback-log.schema.yaml. If skipped, record skipped: true.
Step 12 — Suggest next
"Your strategy is saved. Next:
/prdto turn the bet into a buildable spec — or/opportunityto pressure-test a risky bet against the four risks before you commit to a PRD./cagan-reviewwill stress-test whether the work flows vision → strategy → product."
Rules
- Never start if vision score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate
- A bet without a "won't-do" list is not a strategy — surface the no, every time
- Reject slogans ("win the market", "delight users") — push for a choice with a cost
- The North Star must be user-facing value, not revenue/downloads — revise silently if it slips through
- The insight must be privileged — if anyone with the same vision would make this move, it isn't an insight; sharpen it internally
- Every strategy must name what it sacrifices — rewrite a no-trade-offs draft internally
- Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

