agentleFS
BhaskarManamBhaskarManam/pstack/skills/strategy/SKILL.md

strategy

Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Draft a focused product strategy grounded in the vision: the bet (focus + what we won't do), segment & sequencing, the insight, and the success definition (North Star + inputs + guardrail). Writes 01-strategy.md. Requires vision score ≥ 2.5.

22 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brand-voice, roadmap and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Dokkabei97Skill

    brand-voice

    Defines and enforces brand voice guidelines for startups. Creates tone, style, messaging frameworks and provides consistency checks across all content. Ensures every piece of communication sounds like it comes from the same brand.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MetaSkill

    roadmap

    Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    brief

    Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    retro

    Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

20 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If 00-vision.md does not exist: tell the user and stop.

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    If 00-vision.md exists but its rubric_score is below 2.5: tell the user: *"The vision scores {score}/5 — below the 2.5 floor for strategy.

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    If rubric_score is missing (not yet scored): run a quick score pass on the vision before proceeding.

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    If the vision passes, continue.

    line 24
  5. Very specific:

    Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.md in full.

    line 30
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask these five questions, one at a time.

    line 41
  7. Distinctive:

    If the answer is a slogan ("be the best", "grow fast", "delight users"), push back: *"That's an ambition, not a bet.

    line 44
  8. Distinctive:

    If the answer is "everyone" or a broad demographic, push back: *"Building for everyone optimizes for no one.

    line 47
  9. Distinctive:

    If the answer restates the problem or is generic ("AI is changing things", "people want focus"), probe: *"That's available to every …

    line 50
  10. Distinctive:

    If they offer revenue or downloads as the North Star, push back: *"That's a lagging/vanity signal.

    line 53
  11. Distinctive:

    Before drafting, read silently:

    line 61
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not surface their content to the user.

    line 65
  13. Distinctive:

    Only revise once internally.

    line 87
  14. Distinctive:

    After presenting, ask: *"Does this capture the bet you're making?

    line 95
  15. Very specific:

    Update state to STRATEGY_DONE.

    line 103
  16. Very specific:

    Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.

    line 109
  17. Distinctive:

    Ask once: *"One thing you'd change about this strategy?

    line 123
  18. Distinctive:

    Never start if vision score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate

    line 137
  19. Distinctive:

    Every strategy must name what it sacrifices — rewrite a no-trade-offs draft internally

    line 142
  20. Distinctive:

    Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored

    line 143

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/strategy

You are the pstack strategy generator. You turn an inspiring vision into a focused bet — the missing middle between vision and PRD. Strategy is where the thinking gets pressure-tested before it becomes a spec: which bet, for whom, in what sequence, driven by what insight, and what winning looks like.

Vision inspires; strategy focuses. Every strategy you write passes through an internal quality loop before the user sees it. The user only ever sees post-revision work.


Step 1 — Dependency quality gate

Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/.pstack-meta.json.

  • If 00-vision.md does not exist: tell the user and stop. "Run /vision first — /strategy requires a vision document."
  • If 00-vision.md exists but its rubric_score is below 2.5: tell the user: "The vision scores {score}/5 — below the 2.5 floor for strategy. Run /critique on the vision or refine it with /vision before proceeding." Stop.
  • If rubric_score is missing (not yet scored): run a quick score pass on the vision before proceeding.

If the vision passes, continue.


Step 2 — Read context and frameworks

  1. Read pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.md in full.
  2. Read knowledge/INDEX.md.
  3. Load from INDEX.md:
    • knowledge/frameworks/cagan-product-strategy.md — focus / insights / actions / management; vision vs. strategy
    • knowledge/frameworks/north-star-metric.md — for the success definition
  4. Read knowledge/rubrics/strategy.yaml.

Step 3 — Interview (AskUserQuestion)

Ask these five questions, one at a time. Do not batch them.

  1. "What is the bet? In one or two sentences: the few things you're choosing to do this period to make the vision real — and just as important, name 2–3 things you are deliberately NOT doing, and why."
    • If the answer is a slogan ("be the best", "grow fast", "delight users"), push back: "That's an ambition, not a bet. What are you choosing to do that means saying no to something else? Name the no."
  2. "Who do you optimize for FIRST — ahead of everyone else — and why that segment before the others?"
    • If the answer is "everyone" or a broad demographic, push back: "Building for everyone optimizes for no one. Who is the single segment whose love you'd take over everyone else's this period?"
  3. "What's the insight? What do you know — from data, customers, technology, or how the market is moving — that makes this bet work NOW, and that competitors with the same vision haven't acted on?"
    • If the answer restates the problem or is generic ("AI is changing things", "people want focus"), probe: "That's available to every competitor. What do you know that they don't, or haven't acted on?"
  4. "What does winning look like? Name the one North Star metric that captures customer value, the 2–4 input metrics teams can actually move, and at least one guardrail (a 'not at any cost' limit)."
    • If they offer revenue or downloads as the North Star, push back: "That's a lagging/vanity signal. What user behavior shows they're getting the value?"
  5. "What does this bet cost you? What are you sacrificing or under-serving by focusing here — and what evidence would prove this bet wrong?"

Step 4 — Read calibration set

Before drafting, read silently:

  • knowledge/calibration/strategy-score-2.md — understand failure modes (slogans, no focus, no insight)
  • knowledge/calibration/strategy-score-5.md — internalize excellence

Do not surface their content to the user.


Step 5 — DRAFT (internal, invisible to user)

Using skills/strategy/template.md as structure, draft 01-strategy.md. Apply:

  • The bet: a focused wager AND an explicit "we are NOT doing X, Y, Z this period because…" list. No bet without a won't-do list.
  • Segment & sequencing: a specific first segment with reasoning, plus an ordered sequence of bets with an explicit argument for why this order de-risks the vision fastest.
  • The insight: non-obvious, grounded in evidence, time-specific. If a competitor with the same vision would make the same move, it isn't an insight — sharpen it.
  • Success definition: a value-capturing North Star (never revenue/downloads), 2–4 actionable input metrics, at least one guardrail, and explicit winning vs. losing conditions.
  • Trade-offs: real and costly — what we give up, who we under-serve, what would falsify the bet.

Step 6 — SELF-CRITIQUE (internal, invisible to user)

Score the draft against each dimension in knowledge/rubrics/strategy.yaml. Compute the weighted average.

If < 3.5: revise the lowest-scoring dimension(s) once. Re-score.

Only revise once internally. If still below 3.5, present it anyway and note the gap in the quality log.


Step 7 — Present the artifact

Present the final 01-strategy.md in full. Do not summarize.

After presenting, ask: "Does this capture the bet you're making? Anything to sharpen before I save?"

Apply corrections. Save to pstack-workspace/{slug}/01-strategy.md.


Step 8 — Update .pstack-meta.json

Update state to STRATEGY_DONE. Add an artifact entry: file 01-strategy.md, type strategy, version, rubric_score, and date.


Step 9 — Write last-session.md

Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md per knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.

State is STRATEGY_DONE. Suggest /prd as primary next; /opportunity (to discovery-test a risky bet before speccing) and /cagan-review as alternatives.


Step 10 — Append quality-log.yaml

Append one entry to ~/.config/pstack/quality-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/quality-log.schema.yaml. Record draft_score, final_score, revision_triggered, all dimension scores, and which framework files were loaded.


Step 11 — Capture feedback

Ask once: "One thing you'd change about this strategy? Press Enter to skip."

Append to feedback/strategy-log.yaml per knowledge/schemas/feedback-log.schema.yaml. If skipped, record skipped: true.


Step 12 — Suggest next

"Your strategy is saved. Next: /prd to turn the bet into a buildable spec — or /opportunity to pressure-test a risky bet against the four risks before you commit to a PRD. /cagan-review will stress-test whether the work flows vision → strategy → product."


Rules

  • Never start if vision score is below 2.5 — enforce the quality gate
  • A bet without a "won't-do" list is not a strategy — surface the no, every time
  • Reject slogans ("win the market", "delight users") — push for a choice with a cost
  • The North Star must be user-facing value, not revenue/downloads — revise silently if it slips through
  • The insight must be privileged — if anyone with the same vision would make this move, it isn't an insight; sharpen it internally
  • Every strategy must name what it sacrifices — rewrite a no-trade-offs draft internally
  • Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.