strategy
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
How to gate channels (GO / NO-GO / BLOCKED-BY-GAP) against a manifest and sequence the GO channels on a D-7 to D+7 timeline. Used by /launch-plan.
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- galiprandi/job-seekertheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- ChainGPT-org/chaingpt-claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- HKTITAN/isb-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DayDreamingSheep/tennis-teamtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- andreaskelm/pm-braintheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- keyreylaa/universal-agent-frameworktheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use north-star, brand-voice and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
UMwaiSkillnorth-star
Evaluate whether current work serves the project's ultimate goal. Scores branches, goals, and commits against declared pillars/objectives. Flags drift and misalignment.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Dokkabei97Skillbrand-voice
Defines and enforces brand voice guidelines for startups. Creates tone, style, messaging frameworks and provides consistency checks across all content. Ensures every piece of communication sounds like it comes from the same brand.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MetaSkillroadmap
Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillretro
Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
- andreaskelm/pm-brain★ 235same name
- galiprandi/job-seeker★ 120same name
- thesun4sky/jobstack★ 50same name
- rainday/smart-blog-skills★ 35same name
- skyf0xx/gambit★ 29same name
- superuser-pal/awesome-second-brain★ 14same name
- ChainGPT-org/chaingpt-claude-skill★ 7same name
- BhaskarManam/pstack★ 4same name
- EmanueleMinotto/minottobot★ 4same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptersSkill
- copywritingSkill
- introspectionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 38
Every verdict gets a one-line reason grounded in manifest facts — never generic ("good channel for devtools" is a failure.
- Very specific: line 49
Only go and blocked-by-gap (with scheduled fix) channels enter the timeline.
- Very specific: line 94
Never schedule an assisted or excluded channel as an automated action.
- Distinctive: line 99
Don't pad: a project with 6 real channels gets 6, not 26.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Strategy Router: manifest × channels → plan
Input: launches/<slug>/manifest.yaml + channels/channels.yaml.
Output: launches/<slug>/plan.yaml (machine-readable, schema_version: 1) and
launches/<slug>/PLAN.md (human rendering). Same facts in both — PLAN.md is a view.
1. Verdicts — every channel gets one
Walk EVERY channel in channels/channels.yaml, including excluded. One verdict each:
no-go— the channel doesn't fit this project or this user, and no fixable gap would change that. Always the verdict formode: excluded(reason =exclusion_reason; LaunchPilot never implements those). Also for: audience mismatch (e.g. LinkedIn for a non-B2B tool), invite-only channels whereaccounts.*is explicitlyfalse(e.g. Lobste.rs without an account), paid-API channels the user hasn't opted into (X/Twitter), own-community channels when the user has none.no-go-by-choice— a no-go that follows from an editorial choice of the project, not a structural fact: the verdict is correct today but reversible if the maintainer changes the project. Type case: SaaSHub/AlternativeTo whenalternatives_tois empty because the README chooses to name no competitor. Requiresreversible_by:naming the exact project change that would flip it. PLAN.md renders these in their own "Reversible if you change the project" section. Distinguish carefully: user-state limits (no community memberships, no paid API tier, no invite) are plainno-go— they are not choices embedded in the project.blocked-by-gap— the channel fits, but agap_reportentry blocks it today. Reference the gap inunblocked_by. If the plan schedules the fix, the channel re-enters the timeline after that task — blocked is a state, not a rejection.go— fits and nothing blocks it. If a requirement depends on user-declared state that is stillunknown(HN/Reddit/PH account status), the verdict may still begobut MUST carry apreconditions:list; each precondition becomes a D-7 "confirm" task in the timeline.
Every verdict gets a one-line reason grounded in manifest facts — never generic
("good channel for devtools" is a failure; "security CLI + strong threat-model README
is exactly HN's Show HN profile" is the standard).
Audience matching is mechanical first (manifest.audience.segments ∩
channel.audience), judgment second: a devtool can still be no-go on Product Hunt
if it has no visual story, and a niche channel can be go on a weak intersection if
the census notes say so. State which rule decided.
2. Sequencing — D-7 → D+7
Only go and blocked-by-gap (with scheduled fix) channels enter the timeline.
Anchor: launch_date: null until the user picks D-0; all entries use relative days
(D-7 … D+7) so scripts/make-ics.mjs can materialize real timestamps later.
Phase logic (adapt to the project, don't fill slots mechanically):
- D-7 → D-3, preparation: gap fixes from the gap report (worst first — they gate
everything downstream), account confirmations,
github-metagroundwork (description, topics, release, social preview), kit review. - D-2 → D-1, soft launch: low-blast-radius channels that tolerate iteration — own communities (Telegram/Discord), Bluesky/Mastodon warm-up post, dev.to draft finalized. Purpose: catch broken links and weak copy before the big day.
- D-0, main event: the single highest-leverage channel for this project (usually Show HN for devtools; Product Hunt for consumer/SaaS). Never stack two author-participation channels (HN + PH) on the same day — the author can't be in two comment threads at once.
- D+1 → D+7, follow-up: second-tier communities (Reddit per-subreddit, spaced out — never simultaneous), long-tail directories (SaaSHub/AlternativeTo, DevHunt on its weekly cutoff, launch-directories queue), the technical launch post (dev.to/Hashnode) if not used earlier, and a results follow-up where honest.
Each timeline action: day, channel (or null for prep), type
(prep | assisted | auto | manual), title, details (specific: what artifact,
what precondition it satisfies), and — when the channel has timing advice — BOTH
time_utc (canonical, straight from timing_advice; this is what make-ics
consumes) and time_local (the same instant in the plan's timezone, DST-correct
for the anchored season). Never render a time in only one of the two; PLAN.md
shows both, e.g. "14:00–16:00 UTC (16:00–18:00 Europe/Rome)".
Channel-internal targets named by the router (specific subreddits, specific niche communities) are provisional inferences from the manifest audience. Mark them as such in the plan. At kit time each one must be validated against the venue's actual live rules (posting policy, flair, self-promotion clauses) before its kit is generated, and the kit must cite the verified rule — see the copywriting skill.
Sequencing rationale is part of the output: PLAN.md gets a short "Why this order" section (2-5 sentences grounded in this project's facts).
3. Rules
- Verdicts must cover all channels — count them and say "N channels: X go, Y blocked-by-gap, Z no-go (of which W no-go-by-choice)" in PLAN.md.
- Validate the plan before presenting it:
node scripts/validate-manifest.mjs launches/<slug>/plan.yaml(the validator auto-detects plan files). - Never schedule an
assistedorexcludedchannel as an automated action.autochannels appear astype: autoand still require per-action confirmation at execution time (see CLAUDE.md, Ethics). - Reddit: each subreddit is its own action on its own day; mass cross-posting is an excluded pattern.
- Don't pad: a project with 6 real channels gets 6, not 26.
- PLAN.md ends with "Next: /launch-kit
<slug>".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

