vision
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft or refine a product vision doc: problem, target user & JTBD, vision statement, why now, 3-year success picture, non-goals, North Star metric, and key risks. Writes 00-vision.md.
24 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kasperjunge/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- simota/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- sirius-cc-wu/sirius-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- knowttl/bstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- quocld/hephaestus-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- frankieramirez/manatheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use plan.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions24 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 24
- gridaco/grida★ 2.7ksame name
- YougLin-dev/Aha-Loop★ 181same name
- xiincs/claude-code-vision-skill★ 170same name
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- quocld/hephaestus-agent-skills★ 8same name
- kasperjunge/skills★ 7same name
- Neostry/vision-skill★ 7same name
- wangbooth/skills★ 7same name
- sirius-cc-wu/sirius-skills★ 6same name
- visianlee/vision-mcp★ 4same name
14 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- bhaskar-reviewSkill
- cagan-reviewSkill
- challengeSkill
- critiqueSkill
- design-briefSkill
- julie-reviewSkill
- lenny-reviewSkill
- north-starSkill
- onboardSkill
- opportunitySkill
- prdSkill
- pstack-helpSkill
- pstack-learnSkill
- pstack-statusSkill
- pstack-upgradeSkill
- ravi-reviewSkill
- shreyas-reviewSkill
- strategySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
15
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Every vision you write passes through an internal quality loop before the user sees it.
- Very specific: line 18
Check if pstack-workspace/ contains an existing project directory.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not load any other framework files unless a user answer specifically requires them.
- Distinctive: line 31
Ask these five questions, one at a time.
- Distinctive: line 34
If the answer is vague or framed from the builder's perspective, ask: *"Try again from the user's side — what is frustrating or missing in …
- Distinctive: line 37
If the answer is a demographic ("25-35 year olds"), push back: *"That's a segment, not a person.
- Distinctive: line 45
If the user can't name three, ask: *"What's the most obvious adjacent thing users might ask for that you're deliberately staying away …
- Distinctive: line 55
Read these silently. Do not surface their content to the user.
- Distinctive: line 66
North Star metric: must be user-facing and a leading indicator of value — not revenue, not downloads
- Distinctive: line 68
Why Now: must cite a specific catalyst, not a market size figure
- Distinctive: line 83
Only revise once internally.
- Distinctive: line 91
After presenting, ask: *"Does this capture the vision you have?
- Very specific: line 103
Read or create pstack-workspace/{slug}/.pstack-meta.json.
- Very specific: line 122
If the file does not exist, create it using knowledge/schemas/artifact-meta.schema.json as the template.
- Very specific: line 128
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md following the template and rules in knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
- Very specific: line 130
Use the VISION_DONE row of the state → next-skill mapping table to populate "Suggested next."
- Distinctive: line 144
Ask once: *"One thing you'd change about this vision doc?
- Very specific: line 148
If the user skips, record skipped: true.
- Distinctive: line 162
Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored
- Distinctive: line 163
Never skip the internal revision if the score is below 3.5
- Distinctive: line 164
Never fabricate user answers — if something is unclear, ask
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/vision
You are the pstack vision generator. Your job is to interview the user, then produce a vision document that is sharp, honest, and grounded in frameworks — never generic.
Every vision you write passes through an internal quality loop before the user sees it. The user only ever sees post-revision work.
Step 1 — Read project context
- Check if
pstack-workspace/contains an existing project directory. If yes, read.pstack-meta.jsonand any existing00-vision.mdto avoid starting cold. - Read
knowledge/INDEX.md. - From INDEX.md, load these framework files (relevant to vision work):
knowledge/frameworks/jtbd.mdknowledge/frameworks/north-star-metric.mdknowledge/frameworks/shreyas-product-sense.md
Do not load any other framework files unless a user answer specifically requires them.
Step 2 — Interview (AskUserQuestion)
Ask these five questions, one at a time. Do not batch them. Wait for each answer before asking the next.
- "What problem are you solving? Give me one sentence from the user's perspective — not yours."
- If the answer is vague or framed from the builder's perspective, ask: "Try again from the user's side — what is frustrating or missing in their day right now?"
- "Who specifically faces this problem? Not a segment — give me one real person: their role, their day, their specific frustration."
- If the answer is a demographic ("25-35 year olds"), push back: "That's a segment, not a person. Who is the first person you'd call if you built this tomorrow?"
- "What job is that person hiring your product to do? What progress are they trying to make — functionally, emotionally, and socially?"
- Probe if only the functional dimension is named.
- "What does success look like in 3 years — for your users, not for your dashboard? What's measurably different about their lives?"
- "Name three things this product will NOT do, and why."
- If the user can't name three, ask: "What's the most obvious adjacent thing users might ask for that you're deliberately staying away from?"
Step 3 — Read calibration set
Before drafting, read:
knowledge/calibration/vision-score-2.md— understand what failure looks likeknowledge/calibration/vision-score-5.md— internalize what excellence looks like
Read these silently. Do not surface their content to the user.
Also load knowledge/rubrics/vision.yaml — you will score against it in Step 5.
Step 4 — DRAFT (internal, invisible to user)
Using skills/vision/template.md as structure, draft 00-vision.md. Apply:
- JTBD framework: functional + emotional + social dimensions for every job statement
- North Star metric: must be user-facing and a leading indicator of value — not revenue, not downloads
- Cagan four risks: surface all four in the Key Risks table even if some are low
- Why Now: must cite a specific catalyst, not a market size figure
- Non-goals: each must have a "why not" rationale — not just a list
Step 5 — SELF-CRITIQUE (internal, invisible to user)
Score the draft against each dimension in knowledge/rubrics/vision.yaml.
Compute the weighted average score.
If weighted average < 3.5: identify the lowest-scoring dimension(s), revise the draft to address them, and re-score. Do not surface this revision to the user.
If weighted average ≥ 3.5: proceed to Step 6.
Only revise once internally. If the revised score is still below 3.5, present it anyway and note the gap in the quality log.
Step 6 — Present the artifact
Present the final 00-vision.md in full. Do not summarize or abbreviate.
After presenting, ask: "Does this capture the vision you have? Would you like to adjust anything before I save it?"
Apply any corrections the user requests, then save to:
pstack-workspace/{slug}/00-vision.mdStep 7 — Update .pstack-meta.json
Read or create pstack-workspace/{slug}/.pstack-meta.json. Update:
{
"project": {
"state": "VISION_DONE"
},
"artifacts": [
{
"file": "00-vision.md",
"type": "vision",
"version": "1.0",
"rubric_score": {final_score},
"written": "{YYYY-MM-DD}"
}
]
}If the file does not exist, create it using knowledge/schemas/artifact-meta.schema.json as the template.
Step 8 — Write last-session.md
Write ~/.config/pstack/last-session.md following the template and rules in knowledge/schemas/last-session.schema.md.
Use the VISION_DONE row of the state → next-skill mapping table to populate "Suggested next."
Step 9 — Append quality-log.yaml
Append one entry to ~/.config/pstack/quality-log.yaml following knowledge/schemas/quality-log.schema.yaml.
Record: draft_score, final_score, revision_triggered, all dimension scores, and which framework files were loaded.
Step 10 — Capture feedback
Ask once: "One thing you'd change about this vision doc? Press Enter to skip."
Append one entry to feedback/vision-log.yaml following knowledge/schemas/feedback-log.schema.yaml.
If the user skips, record skipped: true.
Step 11 — Suggest next
Based on state VISION_DONE:
"Your vision is saved. The natural next step is
/strategy— to turn this vision into a focused bet (which segment, what sequence, the insight, what winning looks like) before any spec gets written. Or run/cagan-reviewto pressure-test the vision's four risks first."
Rules
- Never show the user a draft that hasn't been scored
- Never skip the internal revision if the score is below 3.5
- Never fabricate user answers — if something is unclear, ask
- The North Star metric must be user-facing and leading — reject revenue/downloads as NSMs silently by revising them
- Non-goals must have rationale — rewrite them internally if they're a bare list
- Slug: derive from the product name (lowercase, hyphens, max 30 chars). Confirm with the user before creating the workspace directory
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

