agentleFS
zedarvateszedarvates/frugal-skills/skills/efficiency/SKILL.md

efficiency

Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Instructions for the upstream workflow: Measure tokens, cloud calls, money, latency and local energy per verified task without storing task content.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use start_run() to create a random task identity, record_usage() for provider-neutral counters, record_verdict() after deterministic …

    line 16

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Efficiency ledger

Package scope and prerequisites

This catalog ships instructions, not the executable runtime. Python modules, scripts, local services and optional tools named below must be installed separately from the upstream project. Check their availability before running commands; if they are missing, explain the prerequisite instead of claiming execution or results. The host agent may use model tokens while following these instructions.

Use start_run() to create a random task identity, record_usage() for provider-neutral counters, record_verdict() after deterministic verification, and end_run() when the path finishes. Events contain bounded scalars only; never add prompts, responses, paths, embeddings or transcripts.

The stable output contract is docs/schemas/efficiency-sample-v1.schema.json. Missing measurements are null and must not be rewritten as zero.

Measure the local four-event write path without touching the project journal:

python -m skills.efficiency.benchmark --iterations 200

This proves only ledger overhead on the current filesystem. It does not prove provider coverage, task quality, or the 100-task adoption gate.

For an adoption decision, build separate baseline and candidate replay arms whose samples map the 100 frozen case IDs to validated ledger samples. Pass them to compare_replay_arms(). The comparator requires the frozen corpus, distinct executions, matching project/model/tokenizer/verifier/tool controls, no quality loss beyond one percentage point, no critical regression, and all required measurements. Zero provider calls are reported not_applicable, never as 100% provider-usage coverage.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.