agentleFS
zedarvateszedarvates/frugal-skills/skills/botte-nn/SKILL.md

botte-nn

Skill1 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Instructions for upstream small-classifier inference, active learning, calibration and dataset review. Use when a routing or effort decision needs a separately trained classifier. Requires compatible model files and Rust or numpy runtime components. Not for tier selection (nn-router), generative calls (llm-backends) or lexical tool selection.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

botte-nn — tiny classifier inference and calibration

Package scope and prerequisites

This catalog ships instructions, not the executable runtime. Python modules, scripts, local services and optional tools named below must be installed separately from the upstream project. Check their availability before running commands; if they are missing, explain the prerequisite instead of claiming execution or results. The host agent may use model tokens while following these instructions.

Commands, APIs and runtime behavior described below are conditional examples for a compatible upstream installation; they are not evidence of execution in this package.

Purpose

Inférence de classifieurs feedforward minuscules (effort, binary router), avec le boucle d'apprentissage qui va avec : remontée de verdicts, apprentissage actif, calibration en température et audit du jeu de données.

Inspect the separately installed runtime's model registry first. Use an identifier reported by that registry, and report a missing model instead of assuming that a model file or compiled classifier is available.

python -m skills.botte_nn.cli list
python -m skills.botte_nn.cli predict effort_classifier --input 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.1
python -m skills.botte_nn.cli which --input 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.0

When NOT to use

  • You want a complexity-to-tier decision without a trained model — use nn_router.
  • You want a generative model call — use llm_backends.
  • You want a tool chosen lexically — use tool_router.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.