completion-proof
Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Instructions for upstream Policy A11 review of completion claims lacking a referenced test, command output, artifact hash or passed validation. Use before trusting a done/fixed report. Examine the actual evidence; the catalog does not run the detector or prove the claimed result.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- cmdr-chara/codex-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkit★ 2same name
- cmdr-chara/codex-toolkit★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository114 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-cacheSkill
- agent-compressionSkill
- agent-intelSkill
- agent-overlapSkill
- agent-stateSkill
- ambient-hudSkill
- app-testSkill
- audit-dagSkill
- auto-distillSkill
- auto-memorySkill
- auto-routerSkill
- benchSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- botte-learnSkill
- botte-nnSkill
- botte-proxySkill
- botte-wrapSkill
- cacheSkill
- call-chainsSkill
- capabilitiesSkill
- cardinalSkill
- checkupSkill
- clarificationSkill
- clusterSkill
- code-complexitySkill
- code-duplicationSkill
- code-fingerprintSkill
- code-rulesSkill
- code-stateSkill
- code-wrappersSkill
- comfyuiSkill
- conductorSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- context-compressorSkill
- context-profilerSkill
- context-slicerSkill
- context-windowsSkill
- control-loopSkill
- cost-estimatorSkill
- dag-optimizerSkill
- dashboardSkill
- decision-ladderSkill
- demoSkill
- diff-languageSkill
- directives-auditSkill
- docgenSkill
- docs-stewardSkill
- dynamic-workflowsSkill
- efficiencySkill
- eventsSkill
- fallow-likeSkill
- fallowSkill
- fast-contextSkill
- fixSkill
- fleetSkill
- hailo-visionSkill
- harness-deltaSkill
- harvestSkill
- hermes-bridgeSkill
- hermes-second-brainSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
completion-proof — anomaly A11 detector
Package scope and prerequisites
This catalog ships instructions, not the executable runtime. Python modules, scripts, local services and optional tools named below must be installed separately from the upstream project. Check their availability before running commands; if they are missing, explain the prerequisite instead of claiming execution or results. The host agent may use model tokens while following these instructions.
Commands, APIs and runtime behavior described below are conditional examples for a compatible upstream installation; they are not evidence of execution in this package.
The upstream detector is described by A11 of the upstream docs/local-analysis-policy.md (not bundled here): a completion claim
without proof is an anomaly. Proof is one of:
- structured
proof.test_id/proof.cmd_output_ref/proof.artifact_hash - the same keys at the report root
- an
agent_statecompletion whosevalidationscontain apasseditem with a non-emptyreference - lexical evidence in text reports (
N passed,exit_code=0,pytest,snapshot=,sha256:)
python -m skills.completion_proof.cli [path] # human-readable report
python -m skills.completion_proof.cli .botte --json # compact JSON
python -m skills.completion_proof.test_completion_proofScans .json / .jsonl plus report-named .md/.txt/.html files. The documented upstream mode is report-only; verify the installed command exit status and CI integration. Pairs with code_complexity (A1) and code_duplication (A6).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

