agentleFS
zedarvateszedarvates/frugal-skills/skills/completion-proof/SKILL.md

completion-proof

Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Instructions for upstream Policy A11 review of completion claims lacking a referenced test, command output, artifact hash or passed validation. Use before trusting a done/fixed report. Examine the actual evidence; the catalog does not run the detector or prove the claimed result.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

completion-proof — anomaly A11 detector

Package scope and prerequisites

This catalog ships instructions, not the executable runtime. Python modules, scripts, local services and optional tools named below must be installed separately from the upstream project. Check their availability before running commands; if they are missing, explain the prerequisite instead of claiming execution or results. The host agent may use model tokens while following these instructions.

Commands, APIs and runtime behavior described below are conditional examples for a compatible upstream installation; they are not evidence of execution in this package.

The upstream detector is described by A11 of the upstream docs/local-analysis-policy.md (not bundled here): a completion claim without proof is an anomaly. Proof is one of:

  • structured proof.test_id / proof.cmd_output_ref / proof.artifact_hash
  • the same keys at the report root
  • an agent_state completion whose validations contain a passed item with a non-empty reference
  • lexical evidence in text reports (N passed, exit_code=0, pytest, snapshot=, sha256:)
python -m skills.completion_proof.cli [path]        # human-readable report
python -m skills.completion_proof.cli .botte --json # compact JSON
python -m skills.completion_proof.test_completion_proof

Scans .json / .jsonl plus report-named .md/.txt/.html files. The documented upstream mode is report-only; verify the installed command exit status and CI integration. Pairs with code_complexity (A1) and code_duplication (A6).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.