agentleFS
zedarvateszedarvates/frugal-skills/skills/code-fingerprint/SKILL.md

code-fingerprint

Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Instructions for the upstream SHA-256 code-fingerprint cache and re-analysis gate. Use to assess whether an earlier analysis can be reused after checking code, analysis configuration and dependency changes. This is not a findings detector; use code-complexity, code-duplication, code-state or code-wrappers for findings.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Trigger: Before every audit — check fingerprints, skip unchanged files.

    line 27

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Fingerprinting (P13)

Package scope and prerequisites

This catalog ships instructions, not the executable runtime. Python modules, scripts, local services and optional tools named below must be installed separately from the upstream project. Check their availability before running commands; if they are missing, explain the prerequisite instead of claiming execution or results. The host agent may use model tokens while following these instructions.

Commands, APIs and runtime behavior described below are conditional examples for a compatible upstream installation; they are not evidence of execution in this package.

The upstream fingerprint workflow hashes code to identify candidate reuse. Check analysis settings, dependencies and cache validity as well as source changes before skipping an analysis.

When NOT to use

  • You want the actual findings, not the skip decision — this module is a gate; use code_complexity, code_duplication, code_state or code_wrappers.
  • You want to compare two versions of a prompt rather than of code — use diff_language or prefix_tree.

Trigger: Before every audit — check fingerprints, skip unchanged files.

Usage:

from skills.code_fingerprint import CodeFingerprinter, skip_if_unchanged
fp = CodeFingerprinter()
result = skip_if_unchanged(fp, project_path, analyze_fn)
# If nothing changed: {"skipped": True, "reason": "no changes detected"}

Module: skills/code_fingerprint Cache: .botte-cache/fingerprints.json

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.