evidence-linking-arg
Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage.
In this repository70 other files it gives its agents.
- alias-resolutionSkill
- argument-mappingSkill
- argument-synthesisSkill
- argument-visualizationSkill
- axis-extractionSkill
- axis-validationSkill
- causal-chain-querySkill
- causal-modelingSkill
- claim-decompositionSkill
- claim-extractionSkill
- claim-page-creationSkill
- combination-enumerationSkill
- combination-mappingSkill
- concept-decompositionSkill
- concept-extractionSkill
- concept-page-creationSkill
- confidence-scoringSkill
- confidence-updateSkill
- consistency-checkingSkill
- contradiction-flaggingSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- dimensional-analysisSkill
- dimension-discoverySkill
- dimension-page-creationSkill
- domain-scopingSkill
- edge-batch-creationSkill
- evidence-attachmentSkill
- evidence-collectionSkill
- evidence-linkingSkill
- evidence-weighingSkill
- feedback-loop-detectionSkill
- gap-detectionSkill
- gap-prioritizationSkill
- hierarchy-constructionSkill
- hierarchy-visualizationSkill
- intervention-analysisSkill
- intervention-page-creationSkill
- knowledge-compilationSkill
- loop-documentationSkill
- matrix-exportSkill
- matrix-generationSkill
- mechanism-edge-creationSkill
- mechanism-mappingSkill
- merge-candidatesSkill
- model-gap-detectionSkill
- model-validationSkill
- novelty-scoringSkill
- ontology-buildingSkill
- ontology-exportSkill
- ontology-refinementSkill
- question-generationSkill
- rebuttal-documentationSkill
- relation-typingSkill
- seed-concept-searchSkill
- source-gatheringSkill
- strength-assessmentSkill
- strength-scoringSkill
- synthesis-reportSkill
- taxonomy-validationSkill
- validation-reportSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 38
After budget gate passes, self-check:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Evidence Linking (Argument)
Link evidence to claims with typed relationships. Searches for supporting and contradicting evidence, creates structured edges, assesses evidence quality, and identifies claims lacking sufficient evidential support.
Budget Slice
| Metric | Small | Medium | Large |
| Evidence links created | 15 | 40 | 80 |
| Claims with evidence | 8 | 20 | 40 |
| Contradictions found | 2 | 6 | 12 |
State Ledger
<HARD-GATE>
Print before every iteration:| Metric | Target | Current | % |
| Evidence links created | — | — | — |
| Claims with evidence | — | — | — |
| Contradictions found | — | — | — |
</HARD-GATE>Budget Gate
Cannot exit until 80% of budget targets met.
Adversarial Completeness Probe
After budget gate passes, self-check:
- Are there claims with only supporting evidence (confirmation bias)?
- Are there high-confidence claims with weak evidence?
- Is evidence diversity sufficient (multiple independent sources)?
Max 2 extra iterations if gaps found.
Tactics Available
- strength-assessment — evaluate the strength of evidence-claim relationships
SOPs Available
- evidence-attachment — attach evidence to a claim with typed edge
- strength-scoring — assign strength scores to claims based on evidence
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

