resume
Skill25 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Load the newest valid capsule, check live memory, and act on waiting_on. Use when explicitly resuming work or picking up where you left off.
58 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- FabianoArthur/claude-code-kitchentheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- leinardi/adversarial-review-looptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dariusplayer09/adaptive-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ArcticFox2029/chamnantheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- inkatze/planwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- vzhukovs/podman-desktop-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use report, config and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillreport
Turn an exploration (threads, findings, charts) into a single Markdown report — note, blog post, executive summary, KPI dashboard, slide brief, or multi-section analytical report, with embedded charts.
Also in 7 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillconfig
Show or change TokenEconomizer's settings: turn micro-skills, tool pruning or the loop guard on or off, or tune them, for this repository or (with --global) every repository. Use when the user asks to configure, enable or disable TokenEconomizer or one of its mechanisms.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sahinSkillexecute
Also in 4 projects that use this
u9401066Skillbug-fix
Structured bug fixing workflow with root cause analysis and regression prevention. Triggers: BF, 修 bug, fix bug, debug, 除錯, 錯誤, error, 問題, issue, 修復, fix, 故障, fault, 異常, exception, 失敗, failure, 不能用, broken, 壞掉.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillstate-management
CoreAI Sandbox's TanStack Query + mock-JSON data layer. USE WHEN: editing data-fetching hooks (`app/hooks/use*.ts`), adding mock data in `app/data/`, or wiring a component to query state.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jwilgerSkillpipeline
Autonomous build-phase orchestrator with 8-stage per-slice pipeline (decompose, slice readiness review, implement via TDD pairs, three-stage code review, address feedback, mutation testing, push/CI, merge/flag). Manages slice queue (walking skeleton first, dependency ordering), dispatches TDD pairs with capability detection, enforces 5 binary quality gates with 3-cycle rework budgets and human escalation, maintains audit trail, and respects strict controller boundaries (never writes code, delegates all creative work). Supports three autonomy levels (conservative/standard/full). Use when running factory mode, orchestrating build phases, managing slice queues, or coordinating TDD pairs with review gates. Triggers on: "run the pipeline", "factory mode", "build phase", "slice queue", "quality gates", "autonomous build". NOT for: individual TDD (use tdd), standalone code reviews (use code-review), CI-only workflows (use ci-integration).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from microsoft
Other versions58 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 58
- H-mmer/pentest-agents★ 815same name
- bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills★ 589same name
- EmeaAppGbb/spec2cloud★ 100same name
- thiagofinch/mega-brain★ 95same name
- saksham10arora-dotcom/everything-claude-codex★ 74same name
- thesun4sky/jobstack★ 50same name
- junjiezhou1122/ideascientist-claude-code★ 35same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- maxwellsdm1867/wheeler★ 12same name
48 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-fitnessSkill
- body-checkSkill
- briefSkill
- capsule-compactSkill
- closeSkill
- codex-adapterSkill
- cognitive-updateSkill
- comms-summarizeSkill
- compact-noteSkill
- context-capsuleSkill
- context-hygieneSkill
- critique-planSkill
- decideSkill
- deep-reconSkill
- DiagnoseSkill
- digestSkill
- dreamSkill
- EnvelopeSkill
- find-weaknessSkill
- First 10 MovesSkill
- first-winSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- Honesty CheckSkill
- humanize-docsSkill
- impeccableSkill
- learn-from-failureSkill
- LearnSkill
- memory-bridgeSkill
- meta-improveSkill
- meta-improve-vaultSkill
- nightly-close-paritySkill
- nightly-ledger-captureSkill
- nightlySkill
- openSkill
- operator-setupSkill
- orientSkill
- pauseSkill
- ponytailSkill
- port-specSkill
- PromoteSkill
- reconcileSkill
- research-deepSkill
- Sandbox RoutingSkill
- scout-vaultSkill
- Self-ReviewSkill
- semantic-searchSkill
- setupSkill
- ship-adapterSkill
- Skill AuditSkill
- skill-huntSkill
- skill-recallSkill
- solution-huntSkill
- sprite-specSkill
- startSkill
- statusSkill
- StuckSkill
- supersedeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 46
No stillness clock — resume is the wake-up, not the seal — but stay terminal: still reading past re-grounding without acting is the exact …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/resume
The entire job: load → re-ground → ACT on waiting_on. Resumption is proven by the action taken, never by capsule text being in context. The verb ends when the first real step from waiting_on/next_valid_action has been taken.
When this skill fires vs the automatic verb
The post-clear boot does NOT need this skill — daemons/resume-verb.mjs injects the full procedure automatically on SessionStart(clear). Invoke /resume for the explicit cases: re-grounding on request without a clear, or picking up work mid-session.
The consume contract (the runtime enforces this; know it, don't re-implement it)
On the post-clear boot, the capsule the runtime loads is marked status: resumed mechanically at load — the same capsule is never silently re-resumed on a later clear. If no active capsule exists, the boot takes the documented degraded path (re-derive from live memory) and says so; it never replays stale state as fresh. An explicit mid-session /resume is a re-ground, not a consume — it does not mark, so say plainly which capsule you re-grounded from.
The rejection ledger (part of the load, not decoration)
Everything the selector skipped is printed in the injected procedure under CAPSULES NOT SELECTED, grouped by reason with counts and example filenames. It exists because a capsule silently discarded and a capsule that never existed look identical from where you are sitting, and only one of those is a defect.
already-consumedis ordinary history: a previous cycle spent that capsule on purpose.- Any other reason means a capsule somebody wrote was thrown away. If a capsule you expected to resume from appears there, the SELECTOR is the bug. Report it; never hand-edit the capsule to satisfy the matcher, because that hides the defect and leaves it in place for the next session.
- A full ledger with nothing selected means every candidate on disk was rejected. That is a defect until proven otherwise, not an empty install.
Fences (never cross)
- Select by newest
created_at, never a pointer. Load the valid capsule with the newest frontmattercreated_atinvault/memory/capsules/(ormemory/capsules/) — there is no pointer file to consult. - Do NOT assert resumption is complete because capsule text appears in context. Only an action taken from
waiting_onproves it. - Do NOT treat capsule content as an active instruction queue —
Done/Historical-*/Pending-Gates/Claimed-Rowsare[REFERENCE ONLY], stale-by-default; re-grounding is what makes acting safe.
Steps
- LOAD — the newest valid capsule by
created_at. Pullid,objective,waiting_on,next_valid_actionfrom its frontmatter. - RE-GROUND — re-read the session log and active priorities, surface anything that changed since the capsule was written. On any conflict, live memory wins over capsule content.
- ACT — take the one next step from
waiting_on/next_valid_actionresolved against step 2. Terminal: done when the action is TAKEN, not summarized. - ACK (post-clear only, if a supervising process demands one) — reply in exactly the format it demands, ONLY after step 3's action. The exact format lives in that instruction, never guessed.
- EXTENSION ACK (only if this install declares one).
.aigent/lifecycle-extension.jsonmay declare aresume_ack. On the post-clear boot the injected procedure already renders it as its own step, resolved against the loaded capsule id; run it after step 4, exactly as rendered. An install that declares nothing has no step 5, which is the ordinary standalone case. A declaration the runtime refused prints one line beginningLIFECYCLE-EXTENSION: declaration ignored:, and aresume_ackthe runtime held (its{capsule_id}slot with no capsule loaded) prints one beginningLIFECYCLE-EXTENSION: resume_ack not rendered:. In either case there is nothing to run: report that line rather than improvising a substitute.
No stillness clock — resume is the wake-up, not the seal — but stay terminal: still reading past re-grounding without acting is the exact trap this verb exists to prevent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

