humanize-docs
Skill25 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Rewrite AI documentation structure and flow into conversational prose. Use when humanizing docs, removing checklist spam, or making rigid documents readable.
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-fitnessSkill
- body-checkSkill
- briefSkill
- capsule-compactSkill
- closeSkill
- codex-adapterSkill
- cognitive-updateSkill
- comms-summarizeSkill
- compact-noteSkill
- context-capsuleSkill
- context-hygieneSkill
- critique-planSkill
- decideSkill
- deep-reconSkill
- DiagnoseSkill
- digestSkill
- dreamSkill
- EnvelopeSkill
- find-weaknessSkill
- First 10 MovesSkill
- first-winSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- Honesty CheckSkill
- impeccableSkill
- learn-from-failureSkill
- LearnSkill
- memory-bridgeSkill
- meta-improveSkill
- meta-improve-vaultSkill
- nightly-close-paritySkill
- nightly-ledger-captureSkill
- nightlySkill
- openSkill
- operator-setupSkill
- orientSkill
- pauseSkill
- ponytailSkill
- port-specSkill
- PromoteSkill
- reconcileSkill
- research-deepSkill
- resumeSkill
- Sandbox RoutingSkill
- scout-vaultSkill
- Self-ReviewSkill
- semantic-searchSkill
- setupSkill
- ship-adapterSkill
- Skill AuditSkill
- skill-huntSkill
- skill-recallSkill
- solution-huntSkill
- sprite-specSkill
- startSkill
- statusSkill
- StuckSkill
- supersedeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Every section has exactly 3 perfectly balanced paragraphs
- Distinctive: line 42
If yes, proceed. If no, it might already be human-written — don't over-transform.
- Distinctive: line 76
Use: use, use, help, make sure, let, improve, solid, smooth
- Distinctive: line 80
Read the output aloud. Does it sound like you'd actually say this to someone?
- Distinctive: line 84
No variation in sentence rhythm
- Distinctive: line 109
Add one burstiness break — a 5-word sentence after a long paragraph
- Distinctive: line 112
Not perfect, but 70% better readability.
- Distinctive: line 117
Remove ALL structure (humans still use headers)
- Distinctive: line 125
Keep some sections more formal for contrast
- Distinctive: line 126
Read aloud to check naturalness
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Humanize Docs
Transforms robotic AI-generated documentation into prose that sounds like an actual human wrote it. The approach is aggressive deformalization — not just tweaking tone, but restructuring how information flows to break AI's predictable patterns.
This is a different tool than the humanizer skill. Humanizer removes AI writing tells at the sentence/phrase level (em-dashes, rule-of-three, vague attributions, sycophantic openers). Humanize-docs attacks structural AI-ness: checkbox spam, template overload, perfect symmetry, emotional flatness across an entire document.
When to use this
Clear signals you're dealing with AI-generated docs:
- Checkbox overload:
- [x] Task 1: Do the thing (AC: #1) - CAPS LOCK for CRITICAL IMPORTANT NOTES
- 8+ code templates embedded in one document
- Every section has exactly 3 perfectly balanced paragraphs
- Headers like "LLM Developer Guardrails"
- Phrases: "Certainly, here is...", "It's important to note that...", "Furthermore..."
Transformation workflow
Step 1: Detect
Quick test — does the doc have 5+ of these?
- Perfect structural symmetry (every section same length)
- Zero sentence length variation (all 15-20 words)
- Checkbox addiction
- Template embedding mania
- Emotional flatness (no "wait, why?" or "honestly...")
If yes, proceed. If no, it might already be human-written — don't over-transform.
Step 2: Apply the five core transformations
Execute in order. Don't apply all of them everywhere — humans are inconsistent. Some sections stay formal, others get playful. That asymmetry is the point.
1. Burstiness injection Mix 5-word punches with 30-word reflections. AI writes at one rhythm. Humans don't.
Before:
The system processes requests through a standardized pipeline that validates inputs and returns structured responses to the calling service.
After:
It's a pipeline. Request comes in, gets validated, structured response goes back out. Nothing exotic — but the validation step is where things quietly break.
2. Structure dismantling Break perfect 3-paragraph blocks. Add digressions. Not every section needs the same shape.
3. Checkbox annihilation Convert checklists to flowing prose with "anyway, you'll need..." or "first thing is..."
Before:
- Install package A (required for Task 3)
- Verify installation with command X
- Proceed to next task only after confirmation
After:
Install package A first — Task 3 depends on it. Run command X to verify it worked. Once you get confirmation, move on. If it errors out, the next step breaks, so don't skip this.
4. Template contextualization Replace code dumps with "here's what worked for me..." framing. Give the template a reason to exist before showing it.
5. Vocabulary swap Kill: utilize, leverage, facilitate, ensure, enable, enhance, robust, seamless Use: use, use, help, make sure, let, improve, solid, smooth
Step 3: Quality check
Read the output aloud. Does it sound like you'd actually say this to someone?
Red flags the transformation failed:
- Still too even (every paragraph same vibe)
- No variation in sentence rhythm
- Feels like a "professional robot" instead of a person
- You removed personality instead of adding it
Good signals:
- Some sentences feel almost too casual (then you toned it back)
- It reads faster than before
- You can hear a specific person's voice
Step 4: Domain calibration
Intensity varies by doc type:
| Doc type | Intensity |
| READMEs, internal team docs, onboarding guides, tutorials | High |
| API docs, help docs, technical specs | Moderate |
| Legal, compliance, medical, financial | Gentle only |
Quick mode (30 seconds)
Just need to make something readable without full transformation:
- Kill the checkboxes — flowing list with "you'll need: X, Y, and Z"
- Replace one CAPS LOCK section with italics + context
- Add one burstiness break — a 5-word sentence after a long paragraph
- Swap 3-5 AI vocabulary words (utilize→use, leverage→use, facilitate→help)
Not perfect, but 70% better readability.
Common mistakes
Don't:
- Remove ALL structure (humans still use headers)
- Make everything casual (inconsistency is human)
- Add emojis
- Force humor
- Ignore domain context
Do:
- Vary transformation intensity across sections
- Keep some sections more formal for contrast
- Read aloud to check naturalness
- Preserve technical accuracy above all
Philosophy
AI writes like it's afraid to break rules. Humans write like they're explaining something to a friend while occasionally remembering they should sound professional. Capture that tension.
Related skills
- humanizer — sentence/phrase level AI pattern removal (Wikipedia taxonomy, 29 rules)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

