agentleFS
Sign inStart free
leinardileinardi/adversarial-review-loop/skills/resume/SKILL.md

resume

Skill2 starsChanged 4 days agoGPL-3.0View on GitHub

Continue an already-armed adversarial-review-loop plan in a new session (or adjust the model or plan in this one), without losing the original baseline or any approvals already recorded. Runs to the end of the plan unless --until N sets a pause target.

58 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use execute, bug-fix and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • sahinSkill

    execute

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • u9401066Skill

    bug-fix

    Structured bug fixing workflow with root cause analysis and regression prevention. Triggers: BF, 修 bug, fix bug, debug, 除錯, 錯誤, error, 問題, issue, 修復, fix, 故障, fault, 異常, exception, 失敗, failure, 不能用, broken, 壞掉.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GitHubSkill

    state-management

    CoreAI Sandbox's TanStack Query + mock-JSON data layer. USE WHEN: editing data-fetching hooks (`app/hooks/use*.ts`), adding mock data in `app/data/`, or wiring a component to query state.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    note

    Use this skill to record progress, partial findings, hypotheses, and page-anchored evidence while investigating a long document. Call Note aggressively — any time you read a page and confirm, narrow, or update your understanding of the user's question. Triggers include "jot that down", "save this finding", "note that page 7 says X", or (more often) implicit internal signals — you just learned something and want it recoverable later. Notes persist in the session and Review can select among them. Never paraphrase notes back from memory; write them as you go.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • HermeticOrmusSkill

    close

    End-of-session ritual. Captures session state, updates auto-memory, writes a session summary, then exits the session cleanly.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • jwilgerSkill

    pipeline

    Autonomous build-phase orchestrator with 8-stage per-slice pipeline (decompose, slice readiness review, implement via TDD pairs, three-stage code review, address feedback, mutation testing, push/CI, merge/flag). Manages slice queue (walking skeleton first, dependency ordering), dispatches TDD pairs with capability detection, enforces 5 binary quality gates with 3-cycle rework budgets and human escalation, maintains audit trail, and respects strict controller boundaries (never writes code, delegates all creative work). Supports three autonomy levels (conservative/standard/full). Use when running factory mode, orchestrating build phases, managing slice queues, or coordinating TDD pairs with review gates. Triggers on: "run the pipeline", "factory mode", "build phase", "slice queue", "quality gates", "autonomous build". NOT for: individual TDD (use tdd), standalone code reviews (use code-review), CI-only workflows (use ci-integration).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free