good-strategy
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoCC-BY-SA-4.0View on GitHub
Strategy evaluation and design framework based on Richard Rumelt''s "Good Strategy Bad Strategy" and Michael Porter''s "What Is Strategy?". Use this skill whenever the user is discussing strategy, plans, priorities, vision, roadmaps, OKRs, or competitive positioning — even if they do not explicitly say "good strategy", "Rumelt", "Porter", or "strategy kernel". Triggers include: (1) evaluating whether a strategy is good or bad, (2) diagnosing the core challenge before proposing solutions, (3) building a coherent strategy kernel (diagnosis + guiding policy + coherent actions), (4) stress-testing strategic plans with pre-mortem analysis, (5) diagnosing strategy claims that are actually goals, visions, or budgets dressed up as strategy, (6) reviewing a "strategy doc" or "strategic priorities" for fluff and incoherence, (7) applying Porter''s five forces or value chain analysis, (8) deciding what to say "no" to and identifying trade-offs, (9) auditing roadmaps or resource allocation for strategic coherence.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- continuous-discovery-habitsSkill
- escaping-build-trapSkill
- first-90-daysSkill
- para-methodSkill
- positioning-and-pitchSkill
- sales-pitchSkill
- working-backwardsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.