market-report
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Possible data sources: - MARKETING-AUDIT.md -- from /market audit - LANDING-CRO.md -- from /market landing - SEO-AUDIT.md -- from /market seo - BRAND-VOICE.md -- from /market brand - COMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market competitors - FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md -- from /market funnel - CONTENT-AUDIT.md -- from content analysis - AD-AUDIT.md -- from /market ads - SOCIAL-AUDIT.md -- from /market social - EMAIL-AUDIT.md -- from /market emails If no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to: 1. Run a quick audit first…
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenCMC/skills-for-ai-agents-by-CoinMarketCaptheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- ollie88skwda/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claudeword for word, first seen May 18, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit★ 0100% same
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claude★ 0100% same
- ollie88skwda/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- OpenCMC/skills-for-ai-agents-by-CoinMarketCap★ 75same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- marketSkill
- market-adsSkill
- market-auditSkill
- market-brandSkill
- market-competitorsSkill
- market-copySkill
- market-emailsSkill
- market-funnelSkill
- market-landingSkill
- market-launchSkill
- market-proposalSkill
- market-report-pdfSkill
- market-seoSkill
- market-socialSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs.
- Distinctive: line 29
If no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to:
- Distinctive: line 30
Run a quick audit first (recommended)
- Distinctive: line 32
Create a report template they can fill in
- Very specific: line 146
If competitor data is available from /market competitors, include:
- Distinctive: line 254
Keep it relevant to terms used in the report
- Distinctive: line 366
Always lead with insights and opportunities, not criticism.
- Distinctive: line 369
Use professional formatting: consistent headers, tables for data, checkboxes for action items, clear visual hierarchy.
- Distinctive: line 370
If data from previous skills is available, reference specific findings.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Marketing Report Generator (Markdown Format)
Skill Purpose
Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates.
When to Use
- User wants a full marketing report for a client or their own business
- User has completed one or more audit skills and wants a compiled report
- User asks for a marketing assessment, scorecard, or analysis document
- Triggered by
/market reportor/market report <domain>
How to Execute
Step 1: Collect All Available Data
Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs. Look for these files in the project directory:
Possible data sources:
MARKETING-AUDIT.md-- from/market auditLANDING-CRO.md-- from/market landingSEO-AUDIT.md-- from/market seoBRAND-VOICE.md-- from/market brandCOMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md-- from/market competitorsFUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md-- from/market funnelCONTENT-AUDIT.md-- from content analysisAD-AUDIT.md-- from/market adsSOCIAL-AUDIT.md-- from/market socialEMAIL-AUDIT.md-- from/market emails
If no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to:
- Run a quick audit first (recommended)
- Generate a report based on available information (website URL, user-provided data)
- Create a report template they can fill in
Step 2: Calculate the Marketing Scorecard
Score across 6 categories, each worth up to 100 points. The overall score is the weighted average.
Category 1: Website & Conversion (Weight: 25%)
Evaluate based on landing page analysis, CRO findings, and UX assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| Page load speed | 15 | Under 2s = 15, Under 3s = 10, Under 5s = 5, Over 5s = 0 |
| Mobile responsiveness | 15 | Fully responsive = 15, Mostly = 10, Partially = 5, Not = 0 |
| Clear value proposition | 20 | Immediately clear = 20, Takes effort = 12, Vague = 5, Missing = 0 |
| CTA effectiveness | 20 | Strong and clear = 20, Present but weak = 12, Unclear = 5, Missing = 0 |
| Social proof | 15 | Multiple types = 15, Some = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 |
| Form optimization | 15 | Optimized = 15, Adequate = 10, Needs work = 5, Broken = 0 |
Category 2: SEO & Organic (Weight: 20%)
Evaluate based on SEO audit findings.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| Title tags & meta descriptions | 15 | Optimized = 15, Present = 10, Partial = 5, Missing = 0 |
| Header hierarchy (H1-H6) | 10 | Proper = 10, Mostly = 7, Needs work = 3, Missing = 0 |
| Content quality (E-E-A-T) | 25 | Excellent = 25, Good = 17, Average = 10, Poor = 3 |
| Technical SEO | 20 | No issues = 20, Minor issues = 13, Major issues = 7, Critical = 0 |
| Internal linking | 15 | Strategic = 15, Present = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 |
| Schema markup | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 |
Category 3: Content & Messaging (Weight: 15%)
Evaluate based on brand voice analysis and content audit.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| Brand voice consistency | 20 | Consistent = 20, Mostly = 13, Inconsistent = 7, No voice = 0 |
| Content quality | 25 | Expert-level = 25, Good = 17, Generic = 10, Poor = 3 |
| Content variety | 15 | Multiple formats = 15, Some = 10, Limited = 5, Single = 0 |
| Publishing frequency | 15 | Regular cadence = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, None = 0 |
| Audience targeting | 25 | Precisely targeted = 25, Somewhat = 17, Broad = 10, Off-target = 3 |
Category 4: Social Media & Community (Weight: 15%)
Evaluate based on social media presence and engagement.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| Platform presence | 15 | Right platforms, active = 15, Present but inactive = 8, Missing key = 3 |
| Content quality | 25 | Engaging and on-brand = 25, Adequate = 15, Low quality = 7, Poor = 0 |
| Engagement rate | 25 | Above benchmark = 25, At benchmark = 17, Below = 10, Negligible = 3 |
| Posting consistency | 15 | Regular schedule = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, Abandoned = 0 |
| Community building | 20 | Active community = 20, Some engagement = 13, Broadcast only = 7, None = 0 |
Category 5: Email & Automation (Weight: 15%)
Evaluate based on email marketing assessment.
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| List building mechanism | 20 | Multiple opt-ins = 20, One opt-in = 13, No visible opt-in = 5 |
| Email design & content | 20 | Professional and engaging = 20, Adequate = 13, Needs work = 7 |
| Automation sequences | 25 | Comprehensive = 25, Basic = 15, Minimal = 8, None = 0 |
| Segmentation | 20 | Advanced = 20, Basic = 13, None = 5 |
| Deliverability signals | 15 | Strong = 15, Adequate = 10, Concerning = 5, Problems = 0 |
Category 6: Paid Advertising (Weight: 10%)
Evaluate based on ad account audit (if applicable).
| Factor | Points Available | Criteria |
| Campaign structure | 20 | Well-organized = 20, Adequate = 13, Messy = 7, None = 0 |
| Targeting quality | 25 | Precise and layered = 25, Good = 17, Broad = 10, Wasteful = 3 |
| Ad creative quality | 25 | Compelling and varied = 25, Adequate = 17, Weak = 10, Poor = 3 |
| Landing page alignment | 15 | Perfect match = 15, Good = 10, Misaligned = 5, Broken = 0 |
| Tracking & attribution | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, Missing = 0 |
Overall Score Calculation
Overall Score = (Website * 0.25) + (SEO * 0.20) + (Content * 0.15) + (Social * 0.15) + (Email * 0.15) + (Paid * 0.10)Score Interpretation:
| Score Range | Rating | Meaning |
| 85-100 | Excellent | Marketing is a competitive advantage. Optimize and scale. |
| 70-84 | Good | Solid foundation with clear improvement opportunities. |
| 55-69 | Average | Functional but leaving significant growth on the table. |
| 40-54 | Below Average | Multiple areas need attention. Significant opportunity cost. |
| 0-39 | Critical | Marketing is actively hurting growth. Immediate action required. |
Step 3: Write Category Deep-Dives
For each of the 6 categories, provide:
- Score and Rating -- X/100 with interpretation
- Key Findings -- 3-5 specific observations with evidence
- What's Working -- Positive elements to preserve and build on
- Gaps and Issues -- Problems identified with severity ratings
- Recommendations -- Specific, actionable improvements ranked by impact
- Revenue Impact Estimate -- Estimated financial impact of implementing recommendations
Revenue Impact Estimation Framework:
Impact = (Estimated traffic change * Conversion rate change * Average deal value) * Confidence factor
Example:
- Current monthly traffic: 10,000
- Recommended SEO improvements could increase traffic 30%: +3,000 visits
- Current conversion rate: 2%, CRO could improve to 3%: +1% = +130 conversions
- Average deal value: $500
- Estimated monthly revenue impact: $65,000
- Confidence factor (conservative): 0.5
- Conservative estimate: $32,500/month additional revenueStep 4: Competitor Comparison Summary
If competitor data is available from /market competitors, include:
Competitive Positioning Matrix:
| Factor | Client | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 |
| Website Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| SEO Visibility | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Content Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Social Presence | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Overall Position | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 |
Competitive Advantages: What the client does better Competitive Gaps: Where competitors outperform the client Opportunities: Spaces competitors are not addressing
Step 5: Content Quality Assessment
Summarize content findings across all channels:
- Website copy -- Clarity, persuasiveness, brand alignment
- Blog content -- Depth, expertise, SEO optimization, publishing cadence
- Social media content -- Engagement quality, brand consistency, platform optimization
- Email content -- Subject line effectiveness, body copy quality, CTA strength
- Ad creative -- Messaging clarity, visual quality, offer presentation
Step 6: Conversion Optimization Summary
Compile all conversion-related findings:
- Primary conversion paths -- How visitors become customers
- Funnel leaks -- Where potential customers drop off
- CRO quick wins -- Changes that can be implemented immediately
- Testing opportunities -- A/B tests recommended with hypotheses
- Benchmark comparison -- Current rates vs industry standards
Step 7: SEO Snapshot
Summarize SEO health in a scannable format:
SEO Health Snapshot:
- Title Tags: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- Meta Descriptions: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing]
- H1 Tags: [Proper / Issues / Missing]
- Image Alt Text: [Complete / Partial / Missing]
- Page Speed: [Fast / Moderate / Slow]
- Mobile-Friendly: [Yes / Partially / No]
- Schema Markup: [Present / Partial / Missing]
- Robots.txt: [Configured / Issues / Missing]
- Sitemap: [Present / Issues / Missing]
- HTTPS: [Yes / No]
- Core Web Vitals: [Pass / Needs Work / Fail]Step 8: Build the Prioritized Action Plan
Organize all recommendations into three tiers:
Quick Wins (Implement This Week)
High impact, low effort changes. These should be implementable within 1-5 business days.
Format each item as:
- [ ] [Action item]: [Specific description]
- Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
- Effort: [1-5 hours]
- Expected Result: [Specific outcome]
- Revenue Impact: [$X/month estimated]Medium-Term (Implement This Month)
Moderate impact, moderate effort. These require 1-4 weeks.
Strategic (Implement This Quarter)
High impact, high effort. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort.
Step 9: Build the 30-60-90 Day Roadmap
Days 1-30: Foundation & Quick Wins
- Week 1: Implement all quick wins from the action plan
- Week 2: Set up tracking and analytics baseline
- Week 3: Begin medium-term improvements
- Week 4: First performance review and adjustment
Days 31-60: Growth & Optimization
- Week 5-6: Launch core campaign improvements
- Week 7: A/B testing program begins
- Week 8: Content strategy implementation
Days 61-90: Scale & Expand
- Week 9-10: Scale what's working, cut what isn't
- Week 11: Expand to new channels or campaigns
- Week 12: Comprehensive review, update strategy for next quarter
Step 10: Appendix
Include methodology notes so the client understands how scores were derived:
Scoring Methodology:
- How each category was evaluated
- Data sources used
- Benchmarks referenced
- Limitations and assumptions
- Date of analysis
Tools Used:
- List any tools or scripts used in the analysis
- Reference to scripts/analyze_page.py if used
Glossary:
- Define marketing terms that a non-marketer client may not know
- Keep it relevant to terms used in the report
Output Format
Generate a file called MARKETING-REPORT.md with:
# Marketing Report
## [Company/Domain Name]
### Prepared by: [Agent/Agency Name]
### Date: [Date]
---
## Executive Summary
### Overall Marketing Score: [X/100] -- [Rating]
[2-3 paragraph summary covering: current state assessment, top 3 findings, estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations, and recommended first steps]
### Score Breakdown
| Category | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Website & Conversion | X/100 | [Rating] |
| SEO & Organic | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Content & Messaging | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Social Media | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Email & Automation | X/100 | [Rating] |
| Paid Advertising | X/100 | [Rating] |
| **Overall** | **X/100** | **[Rating]** |
### Top 3 Priority Actions
1. [Most impactful recommendation with revenue estimate]
2. [Second most impactful recommendation]
3. [Third most impactful recommendation]
---
## Detailed Findings
### 1. Website & Conversion [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis with findings, what's working, gaps, recommendations]
### 2. SEO & Organic [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 3. Content & Messaging [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 4. Social Media [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 5. Email & Automation [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
### 6. Paid Advertising [X/100]
[Deep-dive analysis]
---
## Competitor Comparison
[Matrix and analysis]
---
## SEO Snapshot
[Health checklist]
---
## Conversion Optimization Summary
[Funnel analysis and CRO recommendations]
---
## Revenue Impact Summary
| Recommendation | Estimated Monthly Impact | Confidence | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Rec 1] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 1 |
| [Rec 2] | $X,XXX | High/Medium/Low | 2 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| **Total Estimated Impact** | **$XX,XXX/month** | | |
---
## Prioritized Action Plan
### Quick Wins (This Week)
- [ ] [Action items with impact and effort]
### Medium-Term (This Month)
- [ ] [Action items]
### Strategic (This Quarter)
- [ ] [Action items]
---
## 30-60-90 Day Roadmap
[Week-by-week plan]
---
## Appendix
### Methodology
### Tools Used
### Glossary
### Data SourcesKey Principles
- This report should be impressive enough to use as a sales tool. A well-crafted marketing report can open the door to a client engagement.
- Always lead with insights and opportunities, not criticism. Frame everything through the lens of growth potential.
- Quantify everything possible. "$32,000/month in unrealized revenue" is more compelling than "you're leaving money on the table."
- Make the action plan so specific that someone could hand it to a junior marketer and they could execute it.
- Use professional formatting: consistent headers, tables for data, checkboxes for action items, clear visual hierarchy.
- If data from previous skills is available, reference specific findings. If not, be transparent about what's based on analysis vs estimation.
- The report should tell a story: Here's where you are, here's where you could be, here's how to get there, and here's what it's worth.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

