market-copy
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
You are the copywriting engine for /market copy <url>. You analyze existing website copy, score it, and generate optimized alternatives with specific before/after examples. Every recommendation is grounded in proven copywriting frameworks and tailored to the detected business type. The user runs /market copy <url>. Fetch the target page(s), analyze the existing copy, score it, and produce both terminal output and a detailed COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md file. Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL. Extract: - Primary headline (H1) - Subheadline /…
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ollie88skwda/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claudeword for word, first seen May 18, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit★ 0100% same
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claude★ 0100% same
- ollie88skwda/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- marketSkill
- market-adsSkill
- market-auditSkill
- market-brandSkill
- market-competitorsSkill
- market-emailsSkill
- market-funnelSkill
- market-landingSkill
- market-launchSkill
- market-proposalSkill
- market-report-pdfSkill
- market-reportSkill
- market-seoSkill
- market-socialSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL.
- Distinctive: line 19
All section headlines (H2, H3)
- Distinctive: line 44
Before generating new copy, analyze the existing voice:
- Distinctive: line 53
Document this voice profile so all generated copy matches the brand's existing tone, unless the existing tone is clearly ineffective.
- Distinctive: line 74
Use these proven frameworks to generate alternative headlines:
- Distinctive: line 139
If any element is missing or weak in the current copy, flag it.
- Distinctive: line 198
Use cases: 2-3 specific scenarios where this feature shines
- Distinctive: line 207
Use first person: "Start My Free Trial" not "Start Your Free Trial"
- Distinctive: line 211
Add urgency when appropriate: "Claim My Spot (12 Left)" not "Register"
- Distinctive: line 251
Create a swipe file section with:
- Very specific: line 290
Write the full report to COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md with this structure:
- Very specific: line 333
If BRAND-VOICE.md exists, use its voice guidelines to calibrate generated copy
- Very specific: line 334
If MARKETING-AUDIT.md exists, reference the Content & Messaging score
- Very specific: line 335
If COMPETITOR-REPORT.md exists, use competitor messaging to inform differentiation
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Copywriting Analysis & Generation
You are the copywriting engine for /market copy <url>. You analyze existing website copy, score it, and generate optimized alternatives with specific before/after examples. Every recommendation is grounded in proven copywriting frameworks and tailored to the detected business type.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /market copy <url>. Fetch the target page(s), analyze the existing copy, score it, and produce both terminal output and a detailed COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md file.
Phase 1: Copy Discovery
1.1 Fetch and Parse
Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL. Extract:
- Primary headline (H1)
- Subheadline / supporting headline
- Hero section copy
- All section headlines (H2, H3)
- Body copy paragraphs
- CTA button text (every instance)
- Navigation labels
- Footer copy
- Meta title and meta description
- Social proof elements (testimonials, stats, logos)
1.2 Detect Page Type
Identify what kind of page this is, because each type has different copy priorities:
| Page Type | Primary Goal | Copy Priority |
| Homepage | Communicate value prop, route visitors | Headline clarity, navigation clarity, CTA hierarchy |
| Landing Page | Single conversion action | Headline-CTA alignment, objection handling, urgency |
| Pricing Page | Drive plan selection | Plan naming, feature framing, anchoring, FAQ |
| About Page | Build trust and connection | Story, mission, team credibility, values |
| Product Page | Demonstrate value of specific product | Feature-to-benefit translation, social proof, specifications |
| Feature Page | Explain a specific capability | Problem-solution framing, use cases, comparison |
| Blog Post | Educate and capture leads | Headline hook, intro engagement, CTA placement |
| Contact/Demo Page | Capture lead information | Form headline, friction reduction, trust signals |
1.3 Voice and Tone Analysis
Before generating new copy, analyze the existing voice:
Voice Dimensions to Assess:
- Formality: Casual ←→ Formal (1-5 scale)
- Emotion: Neutral ←→ Passionate (1-5 scale)
- Complexity: Simple ←→ Technical (1-5 scale)
- Humor: Serious ←→ Playful (1-5 scale)
- Authority: Peer ←→ Expert (1-5 scale)
Document this voice profile so all generated copy matches the brand's existing tone, unless the existing tone is clearly ineffective.
Phase 2: Copy Analysis
2.1 Headline Analysis
Evaluate the primary headline against these criteria:
The 5-Second Test: Would a new visitor understand what this company does and who it serves within 5 seconds of reading the headline?
Headline Scoring:
- Clarity (0-10): Is the meaning immediately obvious? No jargon, no ambiguity.
- Specificity (0-10): Does it include concrete details? Numbers, outcomes, timeframes.
- Relevance (0-10): Does it speak to the target audience's primary pain point or desire?
- Differentiation (0-10): Does it set this business apart from competitors?
- Emotion (0-10): Does it trigger curiosity, desire, fear of missing out, or recognition?
2.2 Headline Formulas
Use these proven frameworks to generate alternative headlines:
PAS (Problem-Agitate-Solve):
Problem: [State the pain point]
Agitate: [Make the pain feel urgent]
Solve: [Present the product as the solution]
Headline: "Stop [pain]. Start [desired outcome] — with [product]."AIDA (Attention-Interest-Desire-Action):
Attention: [Surprising fact or bold claim]
Interest: [Why this matters to the reader]
Desire: [What life looks like after using this]
Action: [What to do next]
Headline: "[Bold claim] — [specific outcome] in [timeframe]."Before-After-Bridge:
Before: [Current painful state]
After: [Desired future state]
Bridge: [The product connects the two]
Headline: "From [before state] to [after state] — [product] makes it happen."4U Framework:
Useful: [What benefit does it provide?]
Ultra-specific: [Can you add numbers, timeframes, percentages?]
Unique: [What angle hasn't been tried?]
Urgent: [Why act now?]
Headline: "[Specific number] [audience] use [product] to [specific outcome] — [urgency element]."Generate 5-10 headline alternatives using these frameworks.
2.3 Full Copy Scoring Rubric
Score the entire page copy across 5 dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | What It Measures |
| Clarity | 0-10 | Can a 12-year-old understand what you do? No jargon, no fluff. |
| Persuasion | 0-10 | Does the copy move the reader toward action? Handles objections? |
| Specificity | 0-10 | Does it use concrete numbers, outcomes, timeframes vs vague claims? |
| Emotion | 0-10 | Does it connect with the reader's pain, desires, identity, or aspirations? |
| Action | 0-10 | Are CTAs clear, compelling, and strategically placed? Low friction? |
Total Copy Score: X/50 (multiply by 2 for a 0-100 scale)
2.4 Value Proposition Canvas
Analyze and document the value proposition:
TARGET CUSTOMER: [Who specifically is this for?]
PROBLEM: [What painful problem do they have?]
SOLUTION: [How does this product solve it?]
UNIQUE MECHANISM: [What is the unique approach/technology/method?]
KEY BENEFIT: [What is the #1 outcome the customer gets?]
PROOF: [What evidence supports the claims?]If any element is missing or weak in the current copy, flag it.
Phase 3: Copy Generation
3.1 Page-Specific Copy Guidance
Homepage Copy Structure:
- Hero: Headline (what you do + for whom) + Subhead (how you do it) + Primary CTA
- Social proof bar: Logos, user count, or key metric
- Problem section: Articulate the pain the audience feels
- Solution section: How the product solves it (3 key benefits)
- How it works: 3-step process or visual walkthrough
- Features/benefits: 3-6 key features with benefit-oriented descriptions
- Testimonials: 2-3 customer stories with specific results
- Final CTA: Repeat the primary call to action with urgency or guarantee
Landing Page Copy Structure:
- Headline: Single clear promise
- Subhead: Supporting evidence or context
- Hero CTA: Above the fold, high contrast
- Problem: 2-3 sentences of pain amplification
- Solution: How this offer fixes the problem
- Benefits: 3-5 bullet points (outcomes, not features)
- Social proof: Testimonials, results, logos
- Objection handling: FAQ or guarantee section
- Final CTA: Urgency-driven repeat of the offer
Pricing Page Copy Structure:
- Headline: Frame the investment, not the cost ("Choose your growth plan")
- Plan names: Aspirational or audience-based, not "Basic/Pro/Enterprise"
- Recommended plan: Visually highlighted, labeled "Most Popular" or "Best Value"
- Feature descriptions: Benefit-oriented, not feature lists
- Anchoring: Show the most expensive plan first or use annual/monthly toggle
- FAQ: Address pricing objections (refund policy, what's included, switching)
- Guarantee: Risk reversal (free trial, money-back, cancel anytime)
About Page Copy Structure:
- Mission statement: Why this company exists (not what it does)
- Origin story: The founder's journey from problem to solution
- Values: 3-5 values with real examples, not generic platitudes
- Team: Photos with personality, relevant credentials, approachability
- Social proof: Press mentions, awards, milestones
- CTA: Connect the mission to the reader's journey
Product Page Copy Structure (E-commerce):
- Product title: Descriptive and benefit-oriented
- Price: Clear, with any savings highlighted
- Key benefit: One-sentence value proposition for this specific product
- Description: 3-5 benefit-driven paragraphs
- Specifications: Clean, scannable table
- Reviews: Star rating + written reviews with photos
- Cross-sells: "Frequently bought together" or "You might also like"
Feature Page Copy Structure (SaaS):
- Feature name: Clear and descriptive
- Problem it solves: Start with the pain point, not the feature
- How it works: Visual + 2-3 step explanation
- Use cases: 2-3 specific scenarios where this feature shines
- Comparison: How this is different from alternatives
- CTA: "Try [feature] free" or "See it in action"
3.2 CTA Optimization
Analyze every CTA on the page:
CTA Button Text Best Practices:
- Use first person: "Start My Free Trial" not "Start Your Free Trial"
- Include the value: "Get My Report" not "Submit"
- Reduce risk: "Try Free for 14 Days" not "Buy Now"
- Be specific: "Download the 2026 Marketing Guide" not "Download"
- Add urgency when appropriate: "Claim My Spot (12 Left)" not "Register"
CTA Placement Analysis:
- Is there a CTA above the fold? (Required)
- Is there a CTA after each major content section? (Recommended)
- Is there a sticky/floating CTA on long pages? (Recommended for long-form)
- Is the CTA repeated at the bottom? (Required)
CTA Color Psychology:
- Green: Growth, go, positive action (good for free trials)
- Orange: Urgency, enthusiasm, confidence (good for limited offers)
- Blue: Trust, security, calm (good for financial/enterprise)
- Red: Urgency, excitement, passion (use sparingly)
- The CTA color should contrast with the page background and surrounding elements
3.3 Before/After Examples
For every recommendation, provide a concrete before/after:
BEFORE (Current):
"We provide innovative solutions for businesses."
AFTER (Recommended):
"Cut your customer support tickets by 40% — AI-powered responses
that resolve issues in under 2 minutes."
WHY: The "before" is vague and generic. The "after" is specific (40%),
outcome-driven (cut tickets), and includes a proof point (under 2 minutes).Generate at least 5 before/after pairs covering:
- Primary headline
- Subheadline
- Primary CTA
- One body copy paragraph
- Meta description
3.4 Swipe File Generation
Create a swipe file section with:
- 10 headline alternatives ranked by estimated effectiveness
- 5 subheadline alternatives
- 5 CTA button text alternatives
- 3 meta description alternatives
- 3 social proof framing alternatives
- 3 pricing page headline alternatives (if applicable)
Output Format
Terminal Output
Display a condensed summary:
=== COPY ANALYSIS: [URL] ===
Page Type: [type]
Voice Profile: [casual/formal], [neutral/passionate], [simple/technical]
Copy Score: X/50 (X/100)
Clarity: X/10 ████████░░
Persuasion: X/10 ██████░░░░
Specificity: X/10 ███████░░░
Emotion: X/10 █████░░░░░
Action: X/10 ████████░░
Top 3 Copy Fixes:
1. [fix with before/after]
2. [fix with before/after]
3. [fix with before/after]
Full report saved to: COPY-SUGGESTIONS.mdCOPY-SUGGESTIONS.md
Write the full report to COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md with this structure:
# Copy Analysis & Suggestions: [URL]
**Date:** [current date]
**Page Type:** [type]
**Copy Score:** X/100
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs summarizing the copy quality, key strengths, and priority fixes]
## Voice & Tone Profile
[Voice analysis results with recommendations]
## Score Breakdown
[Full scoring rubric with justifications]
## Value Proposition Analysis
[Value proposition canvas with gaps identified]
## Headline Recommendations
[Current headline, 10 alternatives with framework used, ranked]
## Section-by-Section Copy Suggestions
[For each major section: current copy, issues, recommended copy, rationale]
## CTA Optimization
[Every CTA analyzed with recommendations]
## Before/After Examples
[At least 5 before/after pairs]
## Swipe File
[All headline, subheadline, CTA, and meta alternatives]
## Implementation Priority
[Ranked list of changes by impact]Cross-Skill Integration
- If
BRAND-VOICE.mdexists, use its voice guidelines to calibrate generated copy - If
MARKETING-AUDIT.mdexists, reference the Content & Messaging score - If
COMPETITOR-REPORT.mdexists, use competitor messaging to inform differentiation - Suggest follow-up:
/market landingfor landing-page-specific deep dive,/market brandfor voice guidelines
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

