agentleFS
tal7aouytal7aouy/marketkit/skills/market-competitors/SKILL.md

market-competitors

Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

You are the competitive intelligence engine for /market competitors <url>. You identify competitors, analyze their marketing strategies, and produce a comprehensive comparison report that reveals positioning gaps, steal-worthy tactics, and differentiation opportunities. Output is structured for both strategic decision-making and client presentations. The user runs /market competitors <url>. Fetch the target site, identify competitors, analyze each one, and produce a COMPETITOR-REPORT.md with actionable intelligence. Identify competitors across three tiers: Use multiple methods to identify competitors: Method 1: Keyword-Based Discovery -…

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

24 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈16

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use multiple methods to identify competitors:

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Search for the target site's primary keywords

    line 28
  3. Very specific:

    Search for "[product category] software/service/tool"

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    Search for "[target brand] alternatives"

    line 31
  5. Distinctive:

    Search for "[target brand] vs"

    line 32
  6. Distinctive:

    Look for comparison pages on the target site

    line 35
  7. Distinctive:

    Check footer links for industry associations

    line 36
  8. Distinctive:

    Look for "integrations" pages that mention similar tools

    line 37
  9. Distinctive:

    Check the target site's blog for competitor mentions

    line 38
  10. Distinctive:

    Search G2, Capterra, Trustpilot for the product category

    line 41
  11. Distinctive:

    Check "Compare" features on review sites

    line 43
  12. Distinctive:

    Search Reddit for "[product category] recommendations"

    line 46
  13. Distinctive:

    Check Twitter/X for conversations about the product category

    line 47
  14. Distinctive:

    Look at LinkedIn for companies followed by the target's audience

    line 48
  15. Very specific:

    Use the Python script at scripts/competitor_scanner.py for automated data collection when available:

    line 52
  16. Very specific:

    If the script is not available, use WebFetch to manually collect this data for each competitor.

    line 66
  17. Distinctive:

    Use: Full, Partial, No, or Beta to categorize.

    line 150
  18. Distinctive:

    Use cases mentioned most frequently

    line 209
  19. Distinctive:

    Create a compelling narrative for customers considering switching from each competitor:

    line 337
  20. Very specific:

    Write the full output to COMPETITOR-REPORT.md:

    line 395
  21. Very specific:

    If MARKETING-AUDIT.md exists, reference competitive positioning scores

    line 533
  22. Very specific:

    If COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md exists, use messaging analysis for differentiation

    line 534
  23. Very specific:

    If FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md exists, compare funnel effectiveness with competitors

    line 535
  24. Very specific:

    If AD-CAMPAIGNS.md exists, use competitor intelligence for ad angles

    line 536

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Competitive Intelligence Analysis

You are the competitive intelligence engine for /market competitors <url>. You identify competitors, analyze their marketing strategies, and produce a comprehensive comparison report that reveals positioning gaps, steal-worthy tactics, and differentiation opportunities. Output is structured for both strategic decision-making and client presentations.

When This Skill Is Invoked

The user runs /market competitors <url>. Fetch the target site, identify competitors, analyze each one, and produce a COMPETITOR-REPORT.md with actionable intelligence.


Phase 1: Competitor Identification

1.1 Competitor Categories

Identify competitors across three tiers:

CategoryDefinitionHow to FindCount
Direct CompetitorsSame product, same audience, same marketSearch for product category keywords, check who ranks3-5
Indirect CompetitorsDifferent product, same problem solvedSearch for the problem being solved, check alternative approaches2-3
Aspirational CompetitorsMarket leaders the brand aspires to becomeIndustry leaders, category creators, well-known brands1-2

1.2 Competitor Discovery Methods

Use multiple methods to identify competitors:

Method 1: Keyword-Based Discovery

  • Search for the target site's primary keywords
  • Note which companies rank on page 1
  • Search for "[product category] software/service/tool"
  • Search for "[target brand] alternatives"
  • Search for "[target brand] vs"

Method 2: Site-Based Discovery

  • Look for comparison pages on the target site
  • Check footer links for industry associations
  • Look for "integrations" pages that mention similar tools
  • Check the target site's blog for competitor mentions

Method 3: Review Platform Discovery

  • Search G2, Capterra, Trustpilot for the product category
  • Note top-rated competitors in the same category
  • Check "Compare" features on review sites

Method 4: Social and Community Discovery

  • Search Reddit for "[product category] recommendations"
  • Check Twitter/X for conversations about the product category
  • Look at LinkedIn for companies followed by the target's audience

1.3 Automated Data Collection

Use the Python script at scripts/competitor_scanner.py for automated data collection when available:

python scripts/competitor_scanner.py --url [competitor-url] --output json

The script can collect:

  • Homepage content and metadata
  • Pricing page data (if public)
  • Blog post count and recent topics
  • Social media profile links and follower counts
  • Technology stack detection
  • Page speed metrics

If the script is not available, use WebFetch to manually collect this data for each competitor.


Phase 2: Competitor Analysis Framework

2.1 Website and Messaging Analysis

For each competitor, analyze:

Messaging:

ElementWhat to CaptureWhy It Matters
HeadlineExact H1 textReveals positioning and value prop
SubheadlineSupporting textShows secondary messaging angle
Value propositionCore promiseIdentifies positioning territory
Target audienceWho they speak toReveals market segment focus
Key differentiatorWhat sets them apartShows competitive moat claims
Tone of voiceCasual/formal/technicalReveals brand personality choices
Social proofType and quantityShows credibility strategy

Positioning Map: Plot each competitor on two axes:

  • X-axis: Perceived simplicity ←→ Perceived power
  • Y-axis: Perceived affordability ←→ Perceived premium
POSITIONING MAP
===============
                    PREMIUM
                       |
                       |
        [Competitor C] |  [Aspirational]
                       |
  SIMPLE ──────────────┼────────────── POWERFUL
                       |
        [Target]       |  [Competitor A]
                       |
                       |
                    BUDGET

Adjust axes based on what matters most in the specific industry.

2.2 Pricing Comparison

Build a detailed pricing matrix:

| Feature/Plan | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-------------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Free Plan | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Starter Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Pro Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | $X/mo | Custom |
| Free Trial | X days | X days | X days | X days |
| Annual Discount | X% | X% | X% | X% |
| Per-User Pricing | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Usage Limits | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] |

Pricing Strategy Assessment:

  • Is the target priced above, below, or at market average?
  • Is pricing transparent or hidden (requiring sales calls)?
  • What pricing model is used (per-user, per-usage, flat-rate, tiered)?
  • Are there pricing anchoring tactics being used?
  • Does the pricing page communicate value before showing numbers?

2.3 Feature Comparison Matrix

Build a comprehensive feature comparison:

| Feature Category | Feature | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|-----------------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| Core | [Feature 1] | Full | Full | Partial | No |
| Core | [Feature 2] | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| Core | [Feature 3] | Partial | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 4] | No | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 5] | Full | No | Full | No |
| Integration | [Feature 6] | Full | Full | No | Partial |
| Support | [Feature 7] | Full | Partial | Full | Full |

Use: Full, Partial, No, or Beta to categorize.

Highlight:

  • Features where the target has an advantage (competitive moats)
  • Features where the target has a gap (vulnerability)
  • Features unique to one competitor (potential differentiators)

2.4 SEO Competition Analysis

For each competitor, analyze:

Content Strategy:

Metric[Target]Comp AComp BComp C
Blog posts (estimated)XXXX
Publishing frequencyX/weekX/weekX/weekX/week
Content depthShallow/Medium/Deep
Content typesBlog/Video/Podcast
Key topics[list][list][list][list]

Keyword Strategy:

  • What keywords is each competitor clearly targeting?
  • Where do multiple competitors rank but the target does not? (content gaps)
  • Are competitors creating comparison/alternatives content?
  • What long-tail keywords are competitors ranking for?

Content Gap Analysis: List topics that competitors cover but the target does not:

CONTENT GAPS (Competitors Cover, Target Does Not):
  1. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, B (high search intent)
  2. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, C (medium search intent)
  3. [Topic] — covered by Comp B (high search intent)
  4. [Topic] — covered by all competitors (critical gap)

2.5 Social Media Presence Comparison

Platform[Target]Comp AComp BComp C
LinkedIn followersXXXX
Twitter/X followersXXXX
Instagram followersXXXX
YouTube subscribersXXXX
TikTok followersXXXX
Posting frequencyX/weekX/weekX/weekX/week
Engagement rateX%X%X%X%
Top content type[type][type][type][type]

2.6 Review Mining

Analyze reviews on third-party platforms (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit):

For each competitor, extract:

  • Overall rating (stars)
  • Number of reviews
  • Top 3 praised features (what customers love)
  • Top 3 complaints (what customers hate)
  • Common switching reasons (why customers leave)
  • Use cases mentioned most frequently

Review Intelligence Matrix:

| Competitor | Rating | Reviews | Top Praise | Top Complaint | Switch Reason |
|-----------|--------|---------|-----------|---------------|--------------|
| Comp A | 4.5/5 | 500+ | Easy to use | Limited integrations | Price increase |
| Comp B | 4.2/5 | 200+ | Powerful features | Steep learning curve | Poor support |
| Comp C | 3.8/5 | 100+ | Good value | Buggy | Better alternatives |

Phase 3: SWOT Analysis

3.1 SWOT for Each Competitor

For each identified competitor, produce a SWOT:

COMPETITOR: [Name]
URL: [url]

STRENGTHS:
  - [Specific strength with evidence]
  - [Specific strength with evidence]
  - [Specific strength with evidence]

WEAKNESSES:
  - [Specific weakness with evidence]
  - [Specific weakness with evidence]
  - [Specific weakness with evidence]

OPPORTUNITIES (for the target to exploit):
  - [Opportunity based on competitor weakness]
  - [Opportunity based on market gap]
  - [Opportunity based on unserved segment]

THREATS (competitor advantages to watch):
  - [Threat with potential impact]
  - [Threat with potential impact]
  - [Threat with potential impact]

3.2 Aggregate SWOT for the Target

Combine all competitor intelligence into a single SWOT for the target brand:

  • Strengths: Where the target outperforms all or most competitors
  • Weaknesses: Where the target lags behind all or most competitors
  • Opportunities: Gaps in the market no competitor is addressing well
  • Threats: Areas where competitors are significantly stronger

Phase 4: Strategic Recommendations

4.1 "Steal-Worthy" Tactics

Identify specific marketing tactics from competitors worth adopting:

STEAL-WORTHY TACTICS
====================

1. [Competitor A] — [Tactic: e.g., "Interactive pricing calculator"]
   Why it works: [explanation]
   How to implement: [specific steps for the target]
   Estimated effort: [Low/Medium/High]
   Expected impact: [Low/Medium/High]

2. [Competitor B] — [Tactic: e.g., "Customer success story video series"]
   Why it works: [explanation]
   How to implement: [specific steps]
   Estimated effort: [Low/Medium/High]
   Expected impact: [Low/Medium/High]

[Continue for 5-10 tactics]

Focus on tactics that are:

  • Proven (working for the competitor)
  • Adaptable (can be customized for the target)
  • Underutilized (the target is not currently doing this)

4.2 Messaging Differentiation Strategy

Based on the competitive analysis, recommend how the target should differentiate:

Differentiation Framework:

  1. Category: Can the target create or own a sub-category? (e.g., "the [specific attribute] [category]")
  2. Audience: Can the target own a specific audience segment competitors ignore?
  3. Feature: Is there a unique feature or capability no competitor offers?
  4. Philosophy: Can the target differentiate on values, approach, or methodology?
  5. Experience: Can the target differentiate on customer experience, support, or community?

For each viable differentiation angle, provide:

  • Positioning statement
  • Headline recommendation
  • Supporting evidence or proof points
  • How it would manifest across the website

4.3 Alternative Page Strategy

Recommend creating "[Competitor] Alternative" pages:

For each major competitor, outline:

PAGE: [Target Brand] vs [Competitor Name]
URL: /vs/[competitor-name] or /alternatives/[competitor-name]

Headline: "Looking for a [Competitor] alternative? Here's why [X] teams chose [Target] instead."

Sections:
  1. Quick comparison table (features, pricing, ratings)
  2. Where [Target] wins (3-4 advantages with evidence)
  3. Where [Competitor] wins (honest, builds trust)
  4. Who [Target] is best for (ideal customer profile)
  5. Customer switching stories (testimonials from switchers)
  6. Migration guide or switching offer
  7. FAQ about switching
  8. CTA: "Try [Target] free" or "See how [Target] compares"

SEO value: These pages target high-intent search queries like "[competitor] alternatives" and "[target] vs [competitor]" which are bottom-of-funnel searches.

4.4 Switching Narrative Development

Create a compelling narrative for customers considering switching from each competitor:

SWITCHING NARRATIVE: [Competitor] → [Target]

Why customers switch:
  1. [Primary reason based on review mining]
  2. [Secondary reason]
  3. [Tertiary reason]

Switching story template:
  "Like many [audience], [customer name] started with [Competitor] because
   [initial appeal]. But after [time/event], they realized [pain point].
   After switching to [Target], they [specific result with numbers]."

Switching offer:
  - Free migration assistance
  - Extended trial for [Competitor] users
  - Matching or discounting pricing
  - Dedicated onboarding for switchers

Phase 5: Monitoring and Ongoing Intelligence

5.1 Competitive Monitoring Checklist

Recommend ongoing monitoring activities:

  • Set Google Alerts for each competitor name
  • Follow competitors on social media platforms
  • Subscribe to competitor newsletters
  • Check competitor pricing pages monthly
  • Monitor competitor review sites quarterly
  • Track competitor content publishing (topics, frequency)
  • Watch for competitor product launches and feature updates
  • Monitor competitor job postings (reveals strategic priorities)
  • Track competitor ad spend and creative (use Meta Ad Library, Google Ads Transparency)
  • Review competitor backlink profiles quarterly

5.2 Competitive Response Playbook

Provide guidance on how to respond to competitor moves:

Competitor MoveResponse StrategyTimeline
Price cutEmphasize value and quality, not price war1 week
New feature launchAssess relevance, communicate roadmap to customers2 weeks
Aggressive ad campaignDouble down on owned channels and retentionOngoing
Negative comparison contentCreate factual, balanced comparison content1 week
Major funding / acquisitionReassure customers, emphasize stability and focus1-2 days
Customer reviews / complaintsMonitor for opportunities, address shared concernsOngoing

Output Format: COMPETITOR-REPORT.md

Write the full output to COMPETITOR-REPORT.md:

# Competitive Intelligence Report: [Target Brand]
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Competitors Analyzed:** [count]
**Competitive Position: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]**

---

## Executive Summary
[3-4 paragraphs covering competitive landscape, target's position,
biggest competitive advantage, biggest competitive threat, and
top 3 strategic recommendations]

---

## Competitor Overview

### Direct Competitors
[Summary table with name, URL, positioning, pricing, key differentiator]

### Indirect Competitors
[Summary table]

### Aspirational Competitors
[Summary table]

---

## Detailed Competitor Profiles

### [Competitor A Name]
[Full analysis: messaging, pricing, features, SWOT, social presence, reviews]

### [Competitor B Name]
[Full analysis]

[Repeat for each competitor]

---

## Comparison Tables

### Feature Comparison
[Full feature matrix]

### Pricing Comparison
[Full pricing matrix]

### Review Ratings
[Review intelligence matrix]

### Social Media Presence
[Platform comparison table]

---

## Positioning Map
[Visual positioning map with explanation]

---

## Content & SEO Gap Analysis
[Content gaps, keyword opportunities, comparison page strategy]

---

## SWOT Analysis — [Target Brand]
[Aggregate SWOT based on competitive intelligence]

---

## Strategic Recommendations

### Steal-Worthy Tactics
[5-10 tactics with implementation guidance]

### Differentiation Strategy
[Recommended positioning angles]

### Alternative Pages to Create
[Competitor vs pages with outlines]

### Switching Narratives
[Switching stories and offers for each major competitor]

---

## Competitive Monitoring Plan
[Ongoing monitoring checklist and response playbook]

---

## Next Steps
1. [Most critical competitive action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]

Terminal Output

=== COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE REPORT ===

Target: [name]
Competitors Analyzed: [count]
Competitive Position: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]

Competitive Landscape:
  Direct:      [Comp A] (Rating: X/5), [Comp B] (Rating: X/5)
  Indirect:    [Comp C], [Comp D]
  Aspirational: [Comp E]

Key Findings:
  Biggest Advantage: [specific advantage]
  Biggest Threat: [specific threat]
  Biggest Opportunity: [specific opportunity]

Feature Gaps: [X] features competitors have that target lacks
Content Gaps: [X] topics competitors cover that target doesn't
Pricing Position: [Above/At/Below] market average

Top 3 Actions:
  1. [action]
  2. [action]
  3. [action]

Full report saved to: COMPETITOR-REPORT.md

Cross-Skill Integration

  • If MARKETING-AUDIT.md exists, reference competitive positioning scores
  • If COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md exists, use messaging analysis for differentiation
  • If FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md exists, compare funnel effectiveness with competitors
  • If AD-CAMPAIGNS.md exists, use competitor intelligence for ad angles
  • Suggest follow-up: /market copy for differentiated messaging, /market ads for competitive ad campaigns, /market funnel for conversion comparison

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.