market-competitors
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
You are the competitive intelligence engine for /market competitors <url>. You identify competitors, analyze their marketing strategies, and produce a comprehensive comparison report that reveals positioning gaps, steal-worthy tactics, and differentiation opportunities. Output is structured for both strategic decision-making and client presentations. The user runs /market competitors <url>. Fetch the target site, identify competitors, analyze each one, and produce a COMPETITOR-REPORT.md with actionable intelligence. Identify competitors across three tiers: Use multiple methods to identify competitors: Method 1: Keyword-Based Discovery -…
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ollie88skwda/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claudeword for word, first seen May 18, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit★ 0100% same
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claude★ 0100% same
- ollie88skwda/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- marketSkill
- market-adsSkill
- market-auditSkill
- market-brandSkill
- market-copySkill
- market-emailsSkill
- market-funnelSkill
- market-landingSkill
- market-launchSkill
- market-proposalSkill
- market-report-pdfSkill
- market-reportSkill
- market-seoSkill
- market-socialSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
24 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Use multiple methods to identify competitors:
- Distinctive: line 28
Search for the target site's primary keywords
- Very specific: line 30
Search for "[product category] software/service/tool"
- Distinctive: line 31
Search for "[target brand] alternatives"
- Distinctive: line 32
Search for "[target brand] vs"
- Distinctive: line 35
Look for comparison pages on the target site
- Distinctive: line 36
Check footer links for industry associations
- Distinctive: line 37
Look for "integrations" pages that mention similar tools
- Distinctive: line 38
Check the target site's blog for competitor mentions
- Distinctive: line 41
Search G2, Capterra, Trustpilot for the product category
- Distinctive: line 43
Check "Compare" features on review sites
- Distinctive: line 46
Search Reddit for "[product category] recommendations"
- Distinctive: line 47
Check Twitter/X for conversations about the product category
- Distinctive: line 48
Look at LinkedIn for companies followed by the target's audience
- Very specific: line 52
Use the Python script at scripts/competitor_scanner.py for automated data collection when available:
- Very specific: line 66
If the script is not available, use WebFetch to manually collect this data for each competitor.
- Distinctive: line 150
Use: Full, Partial, No, or Beta to categorize.
- Distinctive: line 209
Use cases mentioned most frequently
- Distinctive: line 337
Create a compelling narrative for customers considering switching from each competitor:
- Very specific: line 395
Write the full output to COMPETITOR-REPORT.md:
- Very specific: line 533
If MARKETING-AUDIT.md exists, reference competitive positioning scores
- Very specific: line 534
If COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md exists, use messaging analysis for differentiation
- Very specific: line 535
If FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md exists, compare funnel effectiveness with competitors
- Very specific: line 536
If AD-CAMPAIGNS.md exists, use competitor intelligence for ad angles
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitive Intelligence Analysis
You are the competitive intelligence engine for /market competitors <url>. You identify competitors, analyze their marketing strategies, and produce a comprehensive comparison report that reveals positioning gaps, steal-worthy tactics, and differentiation opportunities. Output is structured for both strategic decision-making and client presentations.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /market competitors <url>. Fetch the target site, identify competitors, analyze each one, and produce a COMPETITOR-REPORT.md with actionable intelligence.
Phase 1: Competitor Identification
1.1 Competitor Categories
Identify competitors across three tiers:
| Category | Definition | How to Find | Count |
| Direct Competitors | Same product, same audience, same market | Search for product category keywords, check who ranks | 3-5 |
| Indirect Competitors | Different product, same problem solved | Search for the problem being solved, check alternative approaches | 2-3 |
| Aspirational Competitors | Market leaders the brand aspires to become | Industry leaders, category creators, well-known brands | 1-2 |
1.2 Competitor Discovery Methods
Use multiple methods to identify competitors:
Method 1: Keyword-Based Discovery
- Search for the target site's primary keywords
- Note which companies rank on page 1
- Search for "[product category] software/service/tool"
- Search for "[target brand] alternatives"
- Search for "[target brand] vs"
Method 2: Site-Based Discovery
- Look for comparison pages on the target site
- Check footer links for industry associations
- Look for "integrations" pages that mention similar tools
- Check the target site's blog for competitor mentions
Method 3: Review Platform Discovery
- Search G2, Capterra, Trustpilot for the product category
- Note top-rated competitors in the same category
- Check "Compare" features on review sites
Method 4: Social and Community Discovery
- Search Reddit for "[product category] recommendations"
- Check Twitter/X for conversations about the product category
- Look at LinkedIn for companies followed by the target's audience
1.3 Automated Data Collection
Use the Python script at scripts/competitor_scanner.py for automated data collection when available:
python scripts/competitor_scanner.py --url [competitor-url] --output jsonThe script can collect:
- Homepage content and metadata
- Pricing page data (if public)
- Blog post count and recent topics
- Social media profile links and follower counts
- Technology stack detection
- Page speed metrics
If the script is not available, use WebFetch to manually collect this data for each competitor.
Phase 2: Competitor Analysis Framework
2.1 Website and Messaging Analysis
For each competitor, analyze:
Messaging:
| Element | What to Capture | Why It Matters |
| Headline | Exact H1 text | Reveals positioning and value prop |
| Subheadline | Supporting text | Shows secondary messaging angle |
| Value proposition | Core promise | Identifies positioning territory |
| Target audience | Who they speak to | Reveals market segment focus |
| Key differentiator | What sets them apart | Shows competitive moat claims |
| Tone of voice | Casual/formal/technical | Reveals brand personality choices |
| Social proof | Type and quantity | Shows credibility strategy |
Positioning Map: Plot each competitor on two axes:
- X-axis: Perceived simplicity ←→ Perceived power
- Y-axis: Perceived affordability ←→ Perceived premium
POSITIONING MAP
===============
PREMIUM
|
|
[Competitor C] | [Aspirational]
|
SIMPLE ──────────────┼────────────── POWERFUL
|
[Target] | [Competitor A]
|
|
BUDGETAdjust axes based on what matters most in the specific industry.
2.2 Pricing Comparison
Build a detailed pricing matrix:
| Feature/Plan | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-------------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Free Plan | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Starter Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Pro Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | $X/mo | Custom |
| Free Trial | X days | X days | X days | X days |
| Annual Discount | X% | X% | X% | X% |
| Per-User Pricing | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Usage Limits | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] |Pricing Strategy Assessment:
- Is the target priced above, below, or at market average?
- Is pricing transparent or hidden (requiring sales calls)?
- What pricing model is used (per-user, per-usage, flat-rate, tiered)?
- Are there pricing anchoring tactics being used?
- Does the pricing page communicate value before showing numbers?
2.3 Feature Comparison Matrix
Build a comprehensive feature comparison:
| Feature Category | Feature | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|-----------------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| Core | [Feature 1] | Full | Full | Partial | No |
| Core | [Feature 2] | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| Core | [Feature 3] | Partial | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 4] | No | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 5] | Full | No | Full | No |
| Integration | [Feature 6] | Full | Full | No | Partial |
| Support | [Feature 7] | Full | Partial | Full | Full |Use: Full, Partial, No, or Beta to categorize.
Highlight:
- Features where the target has an advantage (competitive moats)
- Features where the target has a gap (vulnerability)
- Features unique to one competitor (potential differentiators)
2.4 SEO Competition Analysis
For each competitor, analyze:
Content Strategy:
| Metric | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
| Blog posts (estimated) | X | X | X | X |
| Publishing frequency | X/week | X/week | X/week | X/week |
| Content depth | Shallow/Medium/Deep | |||
| Content types | Blog/Video/Podcast | |||
| Key topics | [list] | [list] | [list] | [list] |
Keyword Strategy:
- What keywords is each competitor clearly targeting?
- Where do multiple competitors rank but the target does not? (content gaps)
- Are competitors creating comparison/alternatives content?
- What long-tail keywords are competitors ranking for?
Content Gap Analysis: List topics that competitors cover but the target does not:
CONTENT GAPS (Competitors Cover, Target Does Not):
1. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, B (high search intent)
2. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, C (medium search intent)
3. [Topic] — covered by Comp B (high search intent)
4. [Topic] — covered by all competitors (critical gap)2.5 Social Media Presence Comparison
| Platform | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
| LinkedIn followers | X | X | X | X |
| Twitter/X followers | X | X | X | X |
| Instagram followers | X | X | X | X |
| YouTube subscribers | X | X | X | X |
| TikTok followers | X | X | X | X |
| Posting frequency | X/week | X/week | X/week | X/week |
| Engagement rate | X% | X% | X% | X% |
| Top content type | [type] | [type] | [type] | [type] |
2.6 Review Mining
Analyze reviews on third-party platforms (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit):
For each competitor, extract:
- Overall rating (stars)
- Number of reviews
- Top 3 praised features (what customers love)
- Top 3 complaints (what customers hate)
- Common switching reasons (why customers leave)
- Use cases mentioned most frequently
Review Intelligence Matrix:
| Competitor | Rating | Reviews | Top Praise | Top Complaint | Switch Reason |
|-----------|--------|---------|-----------|---------------|--------------|
| Comp A | 4.5/5 | 500+ | Easy to use | Limited integrations | Price increase |
| Comp B | 4.2/5 | 200+ | Powerful features | Steep learning curve | Poor support |
| Comp C | 3.8/5 | 100+ | Good value | Buggy | Better alternatives |Phase 3: SWOT Analysis
3.1 SWOT for Each Competitor
For each identified competitor, produce a SWOT:
COMPETITOR: [Name]
URL: [url]
STRENGTHS:
- [Specific strength with evidence]
- [Specific strength with evidence]
- [Specific strength with evidence]
WEAKNESSES:
- [Specific weakness with evidence]
- [Specific weakness with evidence]
- [Specific weakness with evidence]
OPPORTUNITIES (for the target to exploit):
- [Opportunity based on competitor weakness]
- [Opportunity based on market gap]
- [Opportunity based on unserved segment]
THREATS (competitor advantages to watch):
- [Threat with potential impact]
- [Threat with potential impact]
- [Threat with potential impact]3.2 Aggregate SWOT for the Target
Combine all competitor intelligence into a single SWOT for the target brand:
- Strengths: Where the target outperforms all or most competitors
- Weaknesses: Where the target lags behind all or most competitors
- Opportunities: Gaps in the market no competitor is addressing well
- Threats: Areas where competitors are significantly stronger
Phase 4: Strategic Recommendations
4.1 "Steal-Worthy" Tactics
Identify specific marketing tactics from competitors worth adopting:
STEAL-WORTHY TACTICS
====================
1. [Competitor A] — [Tactic: e.g., "Interactive pricing calculator"]
Why it works: [explanation]
How to implement: [specific steps for the target]
Estimated effort: [Low/Medium/High]
Expected impact: [Low/Medium/High]
2. [Competitor B] — [Tactic: e.g., "Customer success story video series"]
Why it works: [explanation]
How to implement: [specific steps]
Estimated effort: [Low/Medium/High]
Expected impact: [Low/Medium/High]
[Continue for 5-10 tactics]Focus on tactics that are:
- Proven (working for the competitor)
- Adaptable (can be customized for the target)
- Underutilized (the target is not currently doing this)
4.2 Messaging Differentiation Strategy
Based on the competitive analysis, recommend how the target should differentiate:
Differentiation Framework:
- Category: Can the target create or own a sub-category? (e.g., "the [specific attribute] [category]")
- Audience: Can the target own a specific audience segment competitors ignore?
- Feature: Is there a unique feature or capability no competitor offers?
- Philosophy: Can the target differentiate on values, approach, or methodology?
- Experience: Can the target differentiate on customer experience, support, or community?
For each viable differentiation angle, provide:
- Positioning statement
- Headline recommendation
- Supporting evidence or proof points
- How it would manifest across the website
4.3 Alternative Page Strategy
Recommend creating "[Competitor] Alternative" pages:
For each major competitor, outline:
PAGE: [Target Brand] vs [Competitor Name]
URL: /vs/[competitor-name] or /alternatives/[competitor-name]
Headline: "Looking for a [Competitor] alternative? Here's why [X] teams chose [Target] instead."
Sections:
1. Quick comparison table (features, pricing, ratings)
2. Where [Target] wins (3-4 advantages with evidence)
3. Where [Competitor] wins (honest, builds trust)
4. Who [Target] is best for (ideal customer profile)
5. Customer switching stories (testimonials from switchers)
6. Migration guide or switching offer
7. FAQ about switching
8. CTA: "Try [Target] free" or "See how [Target] compares"SEO value: These pages target high-intent search queries like "[competitor] alternatives" and "[target] vs [competitor]" which are bottom-of-funnel searches.
4.4 Switching Narrative Development
Create a compelling narrative for customers considering switching from each competitor:
SWITCHING NARRATIVE: [Competitor] → [Target]
Why customers switch:
1. [Primary reason based on review mining]
2. [Secondary reason]
3. [Tertiary reason]
Switching story template:
"Like many [audience], [customer name] started with [Competitor] because
[initial appeal]. But after [time/event], they realized [pain point].
After switching to [Target], they [specific result with numbers]."
Switching offer:
- Free migration assistance
- Extended trial for [Competitor] users
- Matching or discounting pricing
- Dedicated onboarding for switchersPhase 5: Monitoring and Ongoing Intelligence
5.1 Competitive Monitoring Checklist
Recommend ongoing monitoring activities:
- Set Google Alerts for each competitor name
- Follow competitors on social media platforms
- Subscribe to competitor newsletters
- Check competitor pricing pages monthly
- Monitor competitor review sites quarterly
- Track competitor content publishing (topics, frequency)
- Watch for competitor product launches and feature updates
- Monitor competitor job postings (reveals strategic priorities)
- Track competitor ad spend and creative (use Meta Ad Library, Google Ads Transparency)
- Review competitor backlink profiles quarterly
5.2 Competitive Response Playbook
Provide guidance on how to respond to competitor moves:
| Competitor Move | Response Strategy | Timeline |
| Price cut | Emphasize value and quality, not price war | 1 week |
| New feature launch | Assess relevance, communicate roadmap to customers | 2 weeks |
| Aggressive ad campaign | Double down on owned channels and retention | Ongoing |
| Negative comparison content | Create factual, balanced comparison content | 1 week |
| Major funding / acquisition | Reassure customers, emphasize stability and focus | 1-2 days |
| Customer reviews / complaints | Monitor for opportunities, address shared concerns | Ongoing |
Output Format: COMPETITOR-REPORT.md
Write the full output to COMPETITOR-REPORT.md:
# Competitive Intelligence Report: [Target Brand]
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Competitors Analyzed:** [count]
**Competitive Position: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]**
---
## Executive Summary
[3-4 paragraphs covering competitive landscape, target's position,
biggest competitive advantage, biggest competitive threat, and
top 3 strategic recommendations]
---
## Competitor Overview
### Direct Competitors
[Summary table with name, URL, positioning, pricing, key differentiator]
### Indirect Competitors
[Summary table]
### Aspirational Competitors
[Summary table]
---
## Detailed Competitor Profiles
### [Competitor A Name]
[Full analysis: messaging, pricing, features, SWOT, social presence, reviews]
### [Competitor B Name]
[Full analysis]
[Repeat for each competitor]
---
## Comparison Tables
### Feature Comparison
[Full feature matrix]
### Pricing Comparison
[Full pricing matrix]
### Review Ratings
[Review intelligence matrix]
### Social Media Presence
[Platform comparison table]
---
## Positioning Map
[Visual positioning map with explanation]
---
## Content & SEO Gap Analysis
[Content gaps, keyword opportunities, comparison page strategy]
---
## SWOT Analysis — [Target Brand]
[Aggregate SWOT based on competitive intelligence]
---
## Strategic Recommendations
### Steal-Worthy Tactics
[5-10 tactics with implementation guidance]
### Differentiation Strategy
[Recommended positioning angles]
### Alternative Pages to Create
[Competitor vs pages with outlines]
### Switching Narratives
[Switching stories and offers for each major competitor]
---
## Competitive Monitoring Plan
[Ongoing monitoring checklist and response playbook]
---
## Next Steps
1. [Most critical competitive action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]Terminal Output
=== COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE REPORT ===
Target: [name]
Competitors Analyzed: [count]
Competitive Position: [Strong/Moderate/Weak]
Competitive Landscape:
Direct: [Comp A] (Rating: X/5), [Comp B] (Rating: X/5)
Indirect: [Comp C], [Comp D]
Aspirational: [Comp E]
Key Findings:
Biggest Advantage: [specific advantage]
Biggest Threat: [specific threat]
Biggest Opportunity: [specific opportunity]
Feature Gaps: [X] features competitors have that target lacks
Content Gaps: [X] topics competitors cover that target doesn't
Pricing Position: [Above/At/Below] market average
Top 3 Actions:
1. [action]
2. [action]
3. [action]
Full report saved to: COMPETITOR-REPORT.mdCross-Skill Integration
- If
MARKETING-AUDIT.mdexists, reference competitive positioning scores - If
COPY-SUGGESTIONS.mdexists, use messaging analysis for differentiation - If
FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.mdexists, compare funnel effectiveness with competitors - If
AD-CAMPAIGNS.mdexists, use competitor intelligence for ad angles - Suggest follow-up:
/market copyfor differentiated messaging,/market adsfor competitive ad campaigns,/market funnelfor conversion comparison
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

